Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Reply To Thread

What the media did not show about WrightFollow

#1 Mar 21 2008 at 8:44 AM Rating: Decent
**
269 posts
http://baldeagle08.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/cnn-msnbc-cbs-abc-fox-news-lied-about-pastor-jeremiah-wright-see-911-sermon-in-context/


#2 Mar 21 2008 at 9:03 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,162 posts
That's what the fuss is all about!?

First time I actually bother listening to the sermon in question and I have to admit; the man's got a point.
#3 Mar 21 2008 at 10:51 AM Rating: Decent
The man's a very good speaker.
#4 Mar 21 2008 at 11:57 AM Rating: Decent
Planks wrote:
The man's a very good speaker.


So was Hitler. Now, before I am smacked w/ the "racist" stick or the "conservative" club, let me just say this. I AM AN OBAMA supporter. AND, I agree that the media needs to report on the sermon in it's entirety. However, the comments about 911 sited in this video were only a few of SEVERAL disturbing statements Wright has made from the pulpit.

I watched the Senator's speech in Philly and I really want to believe that he was not influenced by Wright's venom during the 20+ years he has been attending his sermons. I am POSITIVE that Reverend Wright has had a positive influence in regard to the VAST majority of his services (faith in God, family and culture). So, how can we NOT at least entertain the idea, however disturbing that it may be, that Obama has been NEGATIVELY influenced by the obvious hurtful content of some of the reverend's sermons.

I also have to question Obama's comparison of his white grandmother with Reverend Wright's views. He said that he could no more disown Wright than he could his grandmother for making some hurtful statements about young black men and other "cringe" inducing comments. Now, I may be over-simplifying this a bit, but I haven't heard about Obama's grandma getting in front of a room full of religious followers and whipping them up into a froth with explosive and derogatory claims and language. It's very much a case of "apples and oranges".

I used the example of Hitler for a reason. We all know that he was a raving sociopath. But, he was also an accomplished orator. He interspersed his hateful rhetoric with rousing calls for nationalistic pride and self reliance for the German people. He focused his speeches toward lower and middle class Germans who were still feeling the sting and stigma resulting from Germany's humiliating defeat in WWI. In other words, Hitler had an "audience" that was hurting, disenfranchised and searching for retribution for wrongs (real or perceived) committed against them. This is, to a definite lesser degree, similar to Reverend Wright's comments being aimed at the African-American populace.

An extreme example; yes. But it does help illustrate my point. Simply put, no matter how eloquent or accomplished a speaker, politician or religious leader may be, it does not excuse him/her from using their talent to espouse hateful and disturbing rhetoric. Also, it shouldn't matter what one's personal experiences are, no matter how painful or intense. These past experiences are something that need to be drawn upon to develop one's character. But, again, they should not be used as an EXCUSE for spreading such bile and border-line insane statements.

I am still an Obama supporter, but I truly have to do some more research on my own before I can re-establish the FULL confidence I had in the Senator before this situation arose.

Take care, everyone.
#5 Mar 21 2008 at 11:59 AM Rating: Default
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I am still an Obama supporter, but I truly have to do some more research on my own before I can re-establish the FULL confidence I had in the Senator before this situation arose.



This is really good news. I was a little concerned that Obama would have some trouble winning the complete ******* moron vote, but apparently not so!
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#6 Mar 21 2008 at 12:10 PM Rating: Decent
Okaaay....?

Try to post an intelligent argument and one of "those guys" show up. Brilliant response, by the way.

I also note that you have 19,000+ posts so it would appear that your apparent "occupation" is to troll these forums and post "insightful" comments on any and all topics. Nice.

So, before we get into a "post volley" of insults and counter-insults, just let me throw in the proverbial towel now and cede to your obvious greater intellect. You win. I just wanted to get my opinion out there.

Good luck.

Edited, Mar 21st 2008 4:10pm by lovablebrute
#7 Mar 21 2008 at 12:11 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
lovablebrute wrote:
However, the comments about 911 sited in this video were only a few of SEVERAL disturbing statements Wright has made from the pulpit.
So which other sermons have you sought out to listen to in their entirety?

In tangentially related news, everyone's been jawing about the Gallup polls showing Clinton taking the lead (other polls such as Rasmussen didn't show this which is why Gallup made the news, I guess) but Gallup shows that lead down from 7% to a MOE 2% today. Maybe I'm just being pollyanna but I think people are getting weary of this and looking to move past it.

Edited, Mar 21st 2008 3:12pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#8 Mar 21 2008 at 12:13 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
lovablebrute wrote:
Okaaay....?

Try to post an intelligent argument and one of "those guys" show up. Brilliant response, by the way.

I also note that you have 19,000+ posts so it would appear that your apparent "occupation" is to troll these forums and post "insightful" comments on any and all topics. Nice.

So, before we get into a "post volley" of insults and counter-insults, just let me throw in the proverbial towel now and cede to your obvious greater intellect. You win. I just wanted to get my opinion out there.

Good luck.

Edited, Mar 21st 2008 4:10pm by lovablebrute


You compared a minister (who, by the way, had a valid point of view) with Hitler. And THEN expected not to be called on it.

You really, really lose.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#9 Mar 21 2008 at 12:17 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
You compared a minister (who, by the way, had a valid point of view) with Hitler. And THEN expected not to be called on it.
I thought he had a good post. You know who else typed good posts? Hitler.


True story.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Mar 21 2008 at 12:27 PM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
You really, really lose.


First, I DID expect to be called on it. If everyone had the same opinions then this wouldn't be a FORUM. It would be a CULT. I would just hope that the responses would be a little more thoughtful and interesting than being called a moron. That's all.

Secondly, so what if he's a minister? He's still a man with all the requisite frailty and shortcomings. And I THOUGHT I made it clear in my post, but evidently I need to further explain: I cited Hitler's documented talents as a public speaker to demonstrate that an obvious talent in oration does not equal being a positive influence. That was my argument. Take it how you want though.

#11 Mar 21 2008 at 12:31 PM Rating: Decent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
lovablebrute wrote:
I cited Hitler's documented talents as a public speaker to demonstrate that an obvious talent in oration does not equal being a positive influence. That was my argument. Take it how you want though.

As a strawman argument? Okay, that's how I'll take it.

#12 Mar 21 2008 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good
Well, he's not completely wrong.
#13 Mar 21 2008 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
You compared a minister (who, by the way, had a valid point of view) with Hitler. And THEN expected not to be called on it.
I thought he had a good post. You know who else typed good posts? Hitler.
And Hitler invented oration Smiley: nod
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#14 Mar 21 2008 at 12:50 PM Rating: Decent
**
418 posts
I saw a bit on the Daily Show about conservative ministers (Jerry Falwell and another guy) basically saying that the fault for 9-11 could be laid at the feet of the gays and lesbians and secularists. Perhaps it isn't as shocking as a scary black man shouting "God DAMN America!" but the sentiment would appear to be the same. I don't think you can say that Rev. Wright is in the same ballpark as Hitler or even Mr. Farrakhan when it comes to racist remarks.

But what do I know, I'm white and nerdy...
#15 Mar 21 2008 at 12:53 PM Rating: Default
trickybeck wrote:
As a strawman argument? Okay, that's how I'll take it.


I'm NOT trying to ARGUE with anyone. I'm POSTING my OPINION on a CURRENT AFFAIRS TOPIC of NOTED INTEREST on a PUBLIC FORUM. (I wrote all the relevant words in CAPS so they would be easier to read...you're welcome!).

And I once again ask; What's the point of having a forum if everyone is supposed to agree? Just curious.
#16 Mar 21 2008 at 1:05 PM Rating: Decent
naatdog wrote:
I don't think you can say that Rev. Wright is in the same ballpark as Hitler or even Mr. Farrakhan when it comes to racist remarks.


Sigh. For the record, I TRULY think that Falwell was a loon and the world is probably a lot better off without him. That said, I'm NOT comparing Wright to Hitler and Farrahkahn and their views of racism.

Anyway, I was comparing their mutual ability to reach an audience with their obvious incredible oratory abilities and charisma. AND I asked a very simple question: Should we NOT question if someone is using said ability to espouse potentially hurtful or hateful speech? Frankly, I don't care if it is anti simitic, anti black, anti white or anti Norwegian! "Hate Speech" is "Hate Speech". Period.

Edited, Mar 21st 2008 5:10pm by lovablebrute
#17 Mar 21 2008 at 1:11 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
AND I asked a very simple question: Should we NOT question if someone is using said ability to espouse potentially hurtful or hateful speech?


As a member of the audience/congregation, sure. As John Q. Citizen, maybe not so much without some context.

I believe the Constitution, or the rags currently left of it, would still guarantee some protection in the realm of free speech and peaceful assembly explicitly, and separation of church and state implicitly.

Should I CAPITALIZE some of that for EASIER COMPREHENSION?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#18 Mar 21 2008 at 1:19 PM Rating: Decent
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Is this inane ***** not subordinate to Godwin's by NOW!?
SHUT THE HELL UP Smiley: mad

If I was black I would spit in the face of every white man I SAW until the day I DIED.
Good thing I'm only like 1/8th Native..
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#19 Mar 21 2008 at 1:26 PM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
As a member of the audience/congregation, sure. As John Q. Citizen, maybe not so much without some context.

I believe the Constitution, or the rags currently left of it, would still guarantee some protection in the realm of free speech and peaceful assembly explicitly, and separation of church and state implicitly.


Well, gee! Call me "loopy" or "koo-koo" but when we're talking about a person who potentially has a substantial influence on the guy who has a VERY REAL chance on becoming the next leader of the free world, I think that provides a little "context".

Further, while I completely agree with your view on the 1st Amendment, I don't see where it has diddly squat to do with this discussion. But, if it makes you feel better, it did give you a nice air of righteousness! Gratz!!

Samira wrote:
Should I CAPITALIZE some of that for EASIER COMPREHENSION?


VERY nice retort!! STELLAR!! Must have almost given yourself an aneurysm to come up with THAT jewel! Well done.



Edited, Mar 21st 2008 5:32pm by lovablebrute
#20 Mar 21 2008 at 1:31 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
lovablebrute wrote:
Samira wrote:
As a member of the audience/congregation, sure. As John Q. Citizen, maybe not so much without some context.

I believe the Constitution, or the rags currently left of it, would still guarantee some protection in the realm of free speech and peaceful assembly explicitly, and separation of church and state implicitly.


Well, gee! Call me "loopy" or "koo-koo" but when we're talking about a person who potentially has an influence on someone who has a VERY REAL chance on becoming the next leader of the free world, I think that provides a little "context".

Further, while I completely agree with your view on the 1st Amendment, I don't see where it has diddly squat to do with this discussion. But, if it makes you feel better, it did give you a nice air of righteousness! Gratz!!

Samira wrote:
Should I CAPITALIZE some of that for EASIER COMPREHENSION?


VERY nice retort!! STELLAR!! Must have almost given yourself an aneurysm to come up with THAT jewel! Well done.


GOLLY, YOU TOO.

No, I don't think you have the same context in Obama's (actually not even his, but Wright's) case as you have in Hitler's or even Farrakhan's. Call me crazy, but one sermon doesn't equate with years' and decades' worth.

Do you really not think that Wright had some valid points? I understand you're just Socky McTroll, here, but humor me.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#21 Mar 21 2008 at 1:45 PM Rating: Decent
#22 Mar 21 2008 at 1:52 PM Rating: Default
Samira wrote:
GOLLY, YOU TOO. No, I don't think you have the same context in Obama's (actually not even his, but Wright's) case as you have in Hitler's or even Farrakhan's. Call me crazy, but one sermon doesn't equate with years' and decades' worth.


That's the point: It IS Senator Obama's case. He has stated that this man has had a profound influence on his life over the last two decades or so. THAT'S the context. Additionally, by trying to twist the meaning of my post to "Ooooo!!! Wright is JUST LIKE Hitler!!! Whoa is us!! (Which is BULL), you're only showing that you don't have a valid response to what I'm trying to say.

Also, it's not "one sermon". I've watched the DVDs that his church has sold and I have done my research. And NO, I'm not talking about the chuckleheads at Fox News or Youtube! He's made some pretty disturbing statements over the years that would, I assume, concern any AMERICAN CITIZEN with more than two brain cells in their head.

Samira wrote:
Do you really not think that Wright had some valid points? I understand you're just Socky McTroll, here, but humor me.


"Socky McTroll". Yet another ZINGER!! Yes, I do think that Reverend Wright makes some good points. But do those excuse the fallacy and destructive nature of his OTHER POINTS? I don't know. I'm just a troll after all. Maybe after another few THOUSAND posts, I'll be all growed up like you!
#23 Mar 21 2008 at 1:55 PM Rating: Default


Well, gosh. If I'm violating GODWIN'S LAW, then, OH MAN!! I better just shut my trap before the PC Patrol gets here and throws me in the slammer!!!!! Thanks for the heads up pal!
#24 Mar 21 2008 at 1:56 PM Rating: Decent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
So you avoided answering the question. Do you not think Rev. Wright had a valid point to make?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#25 Mar 21 2008 at 1:57 PM Rating: Decent
What makes you assume that any American Citizen would find the comments outrageous? Would any true Scotsman find them outrageous too? Also just by comparing him in any way to Hitler when this thread has nothing to do with ***** is making him seem less likable. Also picking a fight not related to the topic with the regulars is ill advised and will make you slip below the filter line. That in turn makes most people not see your posts, which makes those people happier.


Edit:
Complete idiot wrote:
Well, gosh. If I'm violating GODWIN'S LAW, then, OH MAN!! I better just shut my trap before the PC Patrol gets here and throws me in the slammer!!!!! Thanks for the heads up pal!


No it just completely discredits your argument. It's a shame to, you must have spent a while typing it. Also did you even ******* read the wiki article? It has nothing to do with PC bullshiat. It says that the farther an online discussion goes the higher the probability of someone or something being compared with an element of the Third Reich. The person that does so is completely discredited unless the actual discussion is on the Third Reich.

Edited, Mar 21st 2008 6:00pm by Planks
#26 Mar 21 2008 at 2:01 PM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
So you avoided answering the question. Do you not think Rev. Wright had a valid point to make?


Uh....

lovablebrute wrote:
Yes, I do think that Reverend Wright makes some good points.


Jut pointing that out. Don't get mad at me!!
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 373 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (373)