Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Arthur C. Clarke diesFollow

#1 Mar 18 2008 at 2:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
In other news, Arthur C. Clarke was still alive.

Ninety years of doing what the hell you want to do is a pretty decent run.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#2 Mar 18 2008 at 2:21 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Sad news.

I know the pedophilia allegations were alarming, but this guy invented sci-fi.

/Mourn in a Rick James stylee
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#3 Mar 18 2008 at 2:26 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I know the @#%^philia allegations were alarming,


I'm not sure why I'd be alarmed that an author liked to **** little boys. It's not like after hearing that I suddenly realized the monolith from 2001 was a giant black **** or something.

Wait, it wasn't, was it?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#4 Mar 18 2008 at 2:27 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Happy trails, pardner.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#5REDACTED, Posted: Mar 18 2008 at 2:38 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Bwahahahahaha.
#6 Mar 18 2008 at 2:40 PM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
"There's nothing living in that direction!"

Seeya Art.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#7 Mar 18 2008 at 2:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Deathwysh wrote:
Nobby wrote:
.

....but this guy invented sci-fi.


Bwahahahahaha.

That's probably the stupidest thing you've ever posted here.
You're very young aren't you

____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#8 Mar 18 2008 at 2:45 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

You're very young aren't you


Young like Clarke was when he was reading Jules Verne?

:)

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#9 Mar 18 2008 at 2:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
If Verne or Wells were called SCi-Fi before ACC footled with gravity and radio, you might be onto something.

Alas, you're falling into the fUcktard trap.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#10 Mar 18 2008 at 2:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

You're very young aren't you


Young like Clarke was when he was reading Jules Verne?

:)



Fair enough. I do think it's also fair to say that along with Bradbury and a couple of others Clarke was responsible for the survival of science fiction as more than a curiosity.

I thought this was interesting from the article as well:

Quote:
He was credited with the concept of communications satellites in 1945, decades before they became a reality. Geosynchronous orbits, which keep satellites in a fixed position relative to the ground, are called Clarke orbits.


At least he had a decent grounding in the science part of science fiction. I suppose Verne did, as well. For his time.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#11 Mar 18 2008 at 4:05 PM Rating: Default
***
2,453 posts
Nobby wrote:
Deathwysh wrote:
Nobby wrote:
.

....but this guy invented sci-fi.


Bwahahahahaha.

That's probably the stupidest thing you've ever posted here.
You're very young aren't you



45 actually. Besides Verne and HG Wells, there were a ton of other writers writing sci-fi before Clarke started. I don't know that I would even list him in the first wave of the golden age of sci-fi.
#12 Mar 18 2008 at 4:40 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

If Verne or Wells were called SCi-Fi before


Oh, I didn't realize that was the standard for "invention". If that's the case, though, wouldn't it be the person who referred to them first as such who would have "invented" it?

I'm the wrong person to have pointless semantic duels with.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#13 Mar 18 2008 at 5:36 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
I is sad.

Aside from Heinlin, Clark made it what it was. And without the constant need to fuck underage women or his mother(although, apparently Clark needed little boys? Didn't know that).
#14 Mar 18 2008 at 5:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Does this mean we'll never get that RAMA vs Monolith movie crossover now? Bummer.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#15 Mar 18 2008 at 6:51 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
It's a sad day in fandom Smiley: cry

Calling him an inventor of Sci-Fi (or even using the term for SF) just knock you down a peg in my eyes, Nobby. Smiley: disappointed Until Locus comes out next month, I found the obit in BBC will be the best place to go and read about his life, without looking nerdy.

Of course the AP left out a lot of the details of his life. He got hook on reading SF, after finding a copy of Amazing Stories in Woolworth's.

While the AP mention his memo on satelites, they said nothing about how he work on radar for the RAF during WWII. He wasn't the only Scientist who was to write in SF post Golden Age of SF, but was the best known. None had his stature as both a writer and scientist, who was able to break out of the ghetto, most put SF in.

As to the charges he had a thing for underage boys, he was clear after it was throughly investigated.

He was on top of my list of SF writers, I had wish a chance to meet someday, though least likely to. Now Pratchett will move to #1.

Edited, Mar 18th 2008 10:51pm by ElneClare
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#16 Mar 18 2008 at 7:02 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Not a clue.
#17 Mar 18 2008 at 7:06 PM Rating: Good
Nobby wrote:
but this guy invented sci-fi.
We're talking about Arthur C. Clarke, not Dante Alighieri.
#18 Mar 19 2008 at 4:51 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Archfiend MDenham wrote:
Nobby wrote:
but this guy invented sci-fi.
We're talking about Arthur C. Clarke, not Dante Alighieri.


Where the fUCk is the "science" in the Inferno? Or a time machine, for that matter.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#19 Mar 19 2008 at 5:21 AM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
Archfiend MDenham wrote:
Nobby wrote:
but this guy invented sci-fi.
We're talking about Arthur C. Clarke, not Dante Alighieri.


Where the fUCk is the "science" in the Inferno?
Keep in mind the general state of science in the early 1300s.

Also, theology is a science. In the same sense that sociology or economics is.
#20 Mar 19 2008 at 6:17 AM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
I'd say Dante's trilogy is closer to Fantasy than to Sci-Fi . Smiley: grin
#21 Mar 19 2008 at 8:58 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Dread Lord Aripyanfar wrote:
I'd say Dante's trilogy is closer to Fantasy than to Sci-Fi . Smiley: grin
Take your thread hijacks elsewhere Sheila!

We're talking about my ill-conceived ACC comment here!

My LAWN!!!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#22 Mar 19 2008 at 2:51 PM Rating: Decent
Dread Lord Aripyanfar wrote:
I'd say Dante's trilogy is closer to Fantasy than to Sci-Fi . Smiley: grin
Well, yeah, now it is.

Then again, so is half of what Jules Verne wrote, and his stories are only ~120 years old, rather than ~700.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 372 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (372)