Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
You agree that this is a church someone might join if they want to be active in the local community, but don't see that this would be a logical point for someone new to the area to go in order to get into local politics? How do you justify that position?
I don't agree that, in either case, it
proves intent which is what you keep saying. That it's "obvious", that "everyone knows" it.
It's a pretty likely thing Joph. Despite the whole Mr. Smith fairytale, people don't just end up in politics. They plan for it and build toward it, often for their entire lives. I think it's kinda silly to assume that he had no political motivation when he joined that church, given the nature and influence that church has in the area, and the specifics of Obama's background at the time (no connections to the area, no political ties or contacts, etc).
Your correct that it doesn't prove anything, and barring finding some historical document or putting Obama under a truth serum and asking him, we can't know for absolutely sure, but it's a pretty darn reasonable assumption, isn't it?
Quote:
You're working backwards and making up your own motives for Obama's choices to suit your agenda along the way.
The funny thing is that when I wrote that, my intention wasn't to suit "my agenda" but to come up with an explanation for his attendance in that church for 20 years that didn't include him agreeing with Wright's political ideology. I was trying to put forth the idea that Obama, as a black liberal didn't have much choice but to align himself with someone like Wright in order to advance politically.
I was putting him in the role of a black man given only one route to political meaningfulness and taking it, perhaps planning to change things later on, but realizing that he couldn't do anything about it at the time.
I was trying to give him a reasonable excuse for why he did this. But that kinda went right on over all your heads, didn't it?