Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Text of Obama's SpeechFollow

#152 Mar 26 2008 at 6:53 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Yeah, definitely. "I's a good Chrischin, massa! I's even what you might calls a radical Chrischin!"

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#153 Mar 26 2008 at 8:04 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
But then we're left wondering why he was there if he didn't actually believe what Wright said.
Because the stuff you're obsessed over made up a minority of what Wright was saying and the majority of it... you know the stuff about God and the Bible and Jesus and family and community and stuff?... was stuff that Obama enjoyed.
Rev. Wright wrote:
Look at John 7 for a moment; I want you to look, John 7:2. The Jewish festival of the booths was about to begin. The festival of the booths was celebrated every year as a reminder of the way God's people had wandered in the wilderness for 40 years because they wouldn't trust God, and wanted to do things their own way. Does that sound familiar? Is anybody going to get honest with God in the house of God on this Lord's day? Because the people of God would not trust God and wanted to do things their own way, they brought a punishment on themselves, because of their own behavior and their own choices.

Let me ask again, is any of this sounding familiar? We make choices and we engage in behaviors that bring consequences on our own selves, and we need to stop trying to blame God or blame the devil for stuff we did. How many times have you heard someone say, "The devil made me do it"? Flip Wilson made a million dollars telling that lie: The devil made me do it. We make choices and we engage in behaviors--tell your neighbor: Our choices have consequences. [Echo from audience]

Now some of you all don't like talking your neighbor. You feel uncomfortable in this world which idolizes isolation, anonymity, and so-called socially constructed privacy. You don't want to say something to your neighbor and you looked funny when I saw some of you didn't even look that way. If talking to a stranger makes you uncomfortable, throw your head back and say: My behavior has consequences. [Echo] Our choices have consequences, and our behavior has consequences.

I've told you for over three decades now: God will forgive you for sowing wild oats. But God's forgiveness don't stop the crop. Them oats you sowed will bring a crop. You will reap what you [audience chimes in] sow.

But stop calling your crops your cross. [mocking] "Well... that child is just my cross." No, that child is your crop. A cross is a sacrificial vehicle of redemption that you voluntarily pick up; a crop is the result of something you sowed. Our choices have consequences, our behaviors have consequences. The people of God chose not to obey God and they brought on themselves a punishment of 40 years of wandering in the wilderness. For 40 years, they had to live in booths, and after 40 years, when Joshua led them across the Jordan and into the land that God promised Abraham hundreds of years before they were born.
Yeah, that's some horrible, racist stuff right there telling people to take responsibility for their actions, their family and their community.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#154 Mar 26 2008 at 8:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Jophiel wrote:
Yeah, that's some horrible, racist stuff right there telling people to take responsibility for their actions, their family and their community.


I find it hard to believe.

Are you telling me that those carefully chosen snippets taken out of context do not acurately represent what Reverend Wright has been saying every Sunday during the last 20 years?? That, somehow, those snippets are not the whole story? Or that, if some mischievous soul decided to take the worst of what anyone has said over a period of 20 years, there is a 100% chance that it would shock someone out there?

I can see where you got your title from, Mister.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#155 Mar 26 2008 at 8:38 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
That bit is actually from the "Clinton's never been called a nigger" sermon (I'm not sure why saying that is racist but we're supposed to be outraged). The Biblical stuff makes up the top 2/3s or so and the more political stuff makes up the bottom third.

Unfortunately, the only full text sermons available are the ones we're supposed to be pissed off about. I'd guess the sermons not worth posting are a lot closer to the top 2/3s than the bottom 3rd of the one I quoted. Which, again, might explain why Obama spent time there.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#156REDACTED, Posted: Mar 26 2008 at 8:59 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Because as long as less than half of what they say is hateful, its ok.. -_-
#157 Mar 26 2008 at 9:00 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
AlexanderrOfAsura wrote:
Because as long as less than half of what they say is hateful, its ok.. -_-


That would appear to be the general philosophy of most religious leaders.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#158 Mar 26 2008 at 9:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
AlexanderrOfAsura wrote:
Because as long as less than half of what they say is hateful, its ok.. -_-


Here's the thing: I don't find it hateful. I may just have a different definition of the word than you do, though.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#159 Mar 26 2008 at 9:17 AM Rating: Excellent
You know what's really anti-american?

Blanketly rating down people.

Hateful man, hateful Smiley: cry
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#160 Mar 26 2008 at 9:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
AlexanderrOfAsura wrote:
Because as long as less than half of what they say is hateful, its ok.. -_-
What, exactly, was hateful?

The big airplay lines ("Chickens coming home to roost" and "God damn America") aren't "hateful" in any sense I'd use the word. Out of context, they sound "un-American" but I don't think that argument holds against the entire sermons they're from. Being critical of America isn't the same as being un-American.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#161 Mar 26 2008 at 9:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
You know what's really anti-american?

Blanketly rating down people.

Hateful man, hateful Smiley: cry


Yeah, there's either a bot or a really bored wuss out there.

FUCk 'em dry.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#162 Mar 26 2008 at 9:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
You know what's really anti-american?

Blanketly rating down people.
Blankt rate ups!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#163 Mar 26 2008 at 9:46 AM Rating: Good
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Jophiel wrote:
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
You know what's really anti-american?

Blanketly rating down people.
Blankt rate ups!


That would be my reaction as well.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#164 Mar 26 2008 at 9:50 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
Being critical of America isn't the same as being un-American.


You know, that's the thing I can't get my head around. Even if being un-american means "criticising US domestic/foreign policy", then being "American" means "agreeing with US domestic foreign policy"? Is that what it's all about? Is that how those twats define their beloved national identity?

To me - who's not american but so what - being "american" evokes something about being an individual in a free, prosperous and rapidly evolving country, who has some burning desire to realise his dreams and live his life to the fullest. When I think of a quintessential American, I think of a guy like Louis Amstrong, or Charles bukoswki, or even, god forgive me, someone like Colin powell. People who succeeded against the odds, who were independent, pushed the boundaries, didn't conform to whatever faith/dogma/doctrine was on offer. A guy like Noam Chomsky, spending his life going against the conventional wisdom, and still going, is typically american for me.

Being an ordinary middle-class **** who sings the designated song every morning and wears the right colours on a little pin is not being "american". It's just being a ****.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#165 Mar 26 2008 at 9:53 AM Rating: Good
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Being an ordinary middle-class **** who sings the designated song every morning and wears the right colours on a little pin is not being "american". It's just being a ****.


And since almost by definition he'd sing the song and wear the colors wherever he is. Yeah, not my idea of "American" as a unique entity either.

John Wayne would have worn the pin; but you could never have forced him or shamed him into it.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#166 Mar 26 2008 at 10:12 AM Rating: Good
Samira wrote:
And since almost by definition he'd sing the song and wear the colors wherever he is.


Exactly. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with singing the song, or wearing the colours, if you feel like it. But the day that this becomes the defining quality of being "american", then we're all pretty fUcked.


Edited, Mar 26th 2008 6:12pm by RedPhoenixxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#167 Mar 26 2008 at 1:23 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Not to belabor the obvious, but Trinity was simply the largest and best known church in the district where Obama was working. For someone working as a community organizer in a largely black neighborhood, establishing a relationship with the largest black church in the neighborhood is kind of an obvious plan. It doesn't mean anything else beyond that you're most effective when you're establishing ties with one of the largest pillars of the community you're trying to work with. He didn't actually join the church until three years later (and then was away at Harvard for the next three or four years after that)./quote]


Um.... That's essentially exactly what I was saying. Obama chose this church because it would get him "in" with the local political scene. I don't think it's a huge leap to argue that there was some political motivation in all of this.

[quote]Of course, it sounds much better to make up some grand plan where Obama only met Wright because Obama wanted to be president 23 years later. Well, you have to admire his foresight in that case, I guess.


I didn't say it was because of that specific goal. Stop strawmanning this. It was a means to an end. Where that end put him exactly was obviously unknown at the time, but this church was a route into politics for Obama. We can speculate that he just wanted to help out in the community, but it's really irrelevant either way. The end result *was* that 23 years later, he's running for president. Something that we can assume likely would *not* have happened if he hadn't attended this church (or one similar to it).


As I said repeatedly, it helped establish his bona-fides and gave him the contacts and background needed to advance politically. Whether he chose to do that, or it just happened isn't that relevant. Looking backwards, we can say that his choice of church clearly benefited him in gaining the political career he has today.

The irony I was getting at was that this very choice is *also* what's hurting him now.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#168 Mar 26 2008 at 1:30 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
We can speculate that he just wanted to help out in the community, but it's really irrelevant either way. The end result *was* that 23 years later, he's running for president. Something that we can assume likely would *not* have happened if he hadn't attended this church (or one similar to it).
Ahhhh.... so, by looking at the present we can create a revisionist history complete with our own guesses as to his motives and spin it as truth.

Gotcha.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#169 Mar 26 2008 at 1:47 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Samira wrote:
John Wayne would have worn the pin; but you could never have forced him or shamed him into it.


You wouldn't have had to. That's the point.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#170 Mar 26 2008 at 1:54 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
We can speculate that he just wanted to help out in the community, but it's really irrelevant either way. The end result *was* that 23 years later, he's running for president. Something that we can assume likely would *not* have happened if he hadn't attended this church (or one similar to it).
Ahhhh.... so, by looking at the present we can create a revisionist history complete with our own guesses as to his motives and spin it as truth.

Gotcha.


No. It means we can look at the path someone's life has taken and see where different decisions affected the end result. In exactly the way you could say that someone's decision to move to LA and get a job at a local community theater was a decision that lead to that person breaking into the film industry.

That does not mean that everyone who works at a local community theater is planning a career in film, but it's certainly something that many might use as a route into that industry. It's not the only route, but it's clear that it is one.


You agree that this is a church someone might join if they want to be active in the local community, but don't see that this would be a logical point for someone new to the area to go in order to get into local politics? How do you justify that position?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#171 Mar 26 2008 at 1:54 PM Rating: Good
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
gbaji wrote:
Samira wrote:
John Wayne would have worn the pin; but you could never have forced him or shamed him into it.


You wouldn't have had to. That's the point.


No. It really isn't.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#172 Mar 26 2008 at 2:06 PM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
You agree that this is a church someone might join if they want to be active in the local community, but don't see that this would be a logical point for someone new to the area to go in order to get into local politics? How do you justify that position?
I don't agree that, in either case, it proves intent which is what you keep saying. That it's "obvious", that "everyone knows" it.

You're working backwards and making up your own motives for Obama's choices to suit your agenda along the way.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#173 Mar 26 2008 at 2:14 PM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Samira wrote:
John Wayne would have worn the pin; but you could never have forced him or shamed him into it.


You wouldn't have had to. That's the point.


No. It really isn't.




Here is a box of Crayolas. This way you can draw it out in crayon for Gbaji. You have to watch him, he might eat them.
#174 Mar 26 2008 at 2:27 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
My issue with this whole thing is an article inSlate where Christopher Hutchins claims that last April Obama stated he knew he'd have to throw Wright under the bus sometime in the future, but for the present time was willing to just what developed in the media. That cold and calculating willingness to cast off a supposedly beloved pastor-- if the story is true --is the very description of a narcissist personality, not the warm and altruistic politician his handlers would have us believe.

Totem
#175 Mar 26 2008 at 2:38 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,359 posts
Quote:
That cold and calculating willingness to cast off a supposedly beloved pastor-- if the story is true --is the very description of a narcissist personality, not the warm and altruistic politician his handlers would have us believe.


So he just can't win either way huh? Ain't that a *****?

***

If nothing else that shows a failure to commit to practical and dirty politics that are required for election. I could hardly call his speech as is throwing wright under the bus, and if that represents a change in ideal, then I'd say it's for the better.

Edited, Mar 26th 2008 6:40pm by Pensive
#176 Mar 26 2008 at 2:55 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
You agree that this is a church someone might join if they want to be active in the local community, but don't see that this would be a logical point for someone new to the area to go in order to get into local politics? How do you justify that position?
I don't agree that, in either case, it proves intent which is what you keep saying. That it's "obvious", that "everyone knows" it.


It's a pretty likely thing Joph. Despite the whole Mr. Smith fairytale, people don't just end up in politics. They plan for it and build toward it, often for their entire lives. I think it's kinda silly to assume that he had no political motivation when he joined that church, given the nature and influence that church has in the area, and the specifics of Obama's background at the time (no connections to the area, no political ties or contacts, etc).

Your correct that it doesn't prove anything, and barring finding some historical document or putting Obama under a truth serum and asking him, we can't know for absolutely sure, but it's a pretty darn reasonable assumption, isn't it?

Quote:
You're working backwards and making up your own motives for Obama's choices to suit your agenda along the way.



The funny thing is that when I wrote that, my intention wasn't to suit "my agenda" but to come up with an explanation for his attendance in that church for 20 years that didn't include him agreeing with Wright's political ideology. I was trying to put forth the idea that Obama, as a black liberal didn't have much choice but to align himself with someone like Wright in order to advance politically.

I was putting him in the role of a black man given only one route to political meaningfulness and taking it, perhaps planning to change things later on, but realizing that he couldn't do anything about it at the time.

I was trying to give him a reasonable excuse for why he did this. But that kinda went right on over all your heads, didn't it?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 356 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (356)