Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

it,s F-CAT time again....Follow

#27 Feb 14 2008 at 2:46 PM Rating: Good
***
1,437 posts
Nexa wrote:
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Completly off topic, Have I mentioned that the Brak character is highly annoying and makes me wish to stab my monitor?


I adore Brak more than anyone has a right. I have an entire CD of sound bites from Brak in my car.

Nexa



O Really ?..............Smiley: dubious
#28 Feb 14 2008 at 2:48 PM Rating: Good
Singdall wrote:
Queen Alixana wrote:
Wow, you've mis-read everything I've said and somehow contorted it to some warped version of the truth. I'm done here though, time for Valentine's dinner.

yep, the moral majority working hard for you.

wont miss their stupid ***** when they get tossed out in november.



oh and just how did i mis-read that at all?

you are blaming FCATS and the stress your child is going through on the pubs and the federal gov.

jeb is only partically at fault, the feds have nothing to do with the fcats, and Childes is 100% to blame for the crap hole FL finds its education system in today.


Seriously, we'll talk again when you learn to completely READ the posts that others' make when in discussion with you. It might also help to actually read up on NCLB and its impact on tests such as the FCAT on the state level.

The fact that you stated that I am blaming the stress "my child" is going through on "the pubs and fed gov" shows you didn't read my posts thoroughly at all. I'm 23 years old and have no kids; and was in school the very year the FCAT was instated and required as part of FL's compliance for NCLB. My perspective is one as a still relatively-recent student under the NCLB act, and even how things have changed since I graduated in 2002.

Since you seem to be having the most difficulty with "whom" I am appointing blame, I'll lay it out there for you. The focus of my posts have been directed at the FCAT, not budget cuts, (although they have been mentioned somewhat it has not been my main argument); and why I have felt it is wholly ineffective and even harmful for students and teachers. We seem to agree here. However, Jeb Bush was Governor when is all-brilliant brother passed NCLB, leaving it up to the states to determine a testing instrument that would be best suited for compliance. Jeb Bush was the Governor that made the FCAT a state requirement for tenth and third graders, and a poorly implemented one at that; whether you like it or not. That's really all there is to it, and if you can't understand that point then we really are done here.

If you want though, you can continue to misconstrue everything I say and draw your own conclusions. That's fine, too.
#29 Feb 14 2008 at 2:54 PM Rating: Good
Singdall wrote:
no schools are PUNISHED if they score low. they just do not get the BONUS that the "good" schools get.


That's right, allocating available funding from schools that need it most to ones that need it the least is a great idea.

Seriously, as far as Governors go, I actually feel that Jeb was not as bad as others, but the implementation of the FCAT has been one of his worst moves. I'm not even going to get into Chiles right now, and a lot of your information is very wrong.

Now I really have to go to dinner. I'll reply later if I get back at a decent time, but don't count on it. ;-)

Edited, Feb 14th 2008 5:55pm by Alixana
#30 Feb 14 2008 at 7:02 PM Rating: Default
Queen Alixana wrote:
Singdall wrote:
no schools are PUNISHED if they score low. they just do not get the BONUS that the "good" schools get.


That's right, allocating available funding from schools that need it most to ones that need it the least is a great idea.

Seriously, as far as Governors go, I actually feel that Jeb was not as bad as others, but the implementation of the FCAT has been one of his worst moves. I'm not even going to get into Chiles right now, and a lot of your information is very wrong.

Now I really have to go to dinner. I'll reply later if I get back at a decent time, but don't count on it. ;-)

Edited, Feb 14th 2008 5:55pm by Alixana


again you have no clue what you are talking about. under performing schools DO NOT GET MONEY TAKEN away from them. their budget is set as with ALL public schools in FL.

get that through your head. i know it is a hard concept to understand, but there it is AGAIN.

schools that excel on the blasted FCAT tests GET BONUSES... got that? they make EXTRA MONEY both for the school and for the teachers.

there is NO PUNISHMENT, there is NO REDUCTION OF FUNDS. there is NO REDUCTION OF FUNDS. there is NO REDUCTION OF FUNDS. what about that do you not get? all public schools get money depending on how LARGE the population of that schools attendance is for last school year and it is adjusted after the 1st grading time with the current years enrollment for each school.

so if a school last year had 4,000 students they get funded for 4,000 students at the beginning of this year. but if the reality is they have 3,600 students for this year at the end of the first grading frame, that school will LOSE funding. that has NOTHING to do with the performance of the FCAT standards. also if a school who had 4,000 students last year, but has 4,600 students this year, guess what? yup you figured it out, they get MORE money.

that is set for every single public school in FL.

the FCAT scores determine if the school and its faculty get a BONUS at the end of the year. it has nothing to do with funds allocated for education, supplies, teachers, etc... it has everything to do with earning a bonus for performance.

what of that is a punishment? what of that is NOT allocating funds appropriately for students?

[edit to add]

oh and what info on childes is wrong? dude if you are only 23 now, you were a baby when he was in office. he cut the budget back in the late 80s meaning when you are either in diapers or just out of them and before you even got into school.

Edited, Feb 15th 2008 5:03am by Singdall
#31 Feb 14 2008 at 10:49 PM Rating: Good
Singdall, you remind me of someone who reads what people posts, but rather than actually reading the message, you draw conclusions about what is being said and base all of your points on that.
Quote:

That's right, allocating available funding from schools that need it most to ones that need it the least is a great idea.

Let me spell out what my statement meant, since evidently I am required to do this for anything I say.

Schools that are under performing on the FCAT are schools that are in the most need of funding; however, all of the "bonus" money gets distributed to the "good" schools, most of which have far better funding than the "bad' schools to begin with, which lessens the "bad" schools' chances of becoming on par with the "good" schools. So, in what is the available pool of funding, you have more money going to the programs that need it the least, bonus or not.

Actually, the fact that the pay is tied to teachers rather than the program is far worse and is indicative of how messed up the system truly is. Force teachers to neglect real curriculum, and focus solely on the FCAT and reducing your child's education, and get a PAY BONUS! That is such a slap in the face to the hard-working teachers who already face an uphill battle, and it destroyed a lot of morale in FL teachers. To further expound on this, in Florida, schools are also on a tiered system of A,B,C,D,and F, which is based off of FCAT scores. Furthermore, Jeb has always endorsed public tax dollars for private schools, as well as vouchers so that students ensure attending the "good" private schools and shunning the "bad"- and of course, school choice so that little Timmy can attend an "A" school instead of the "F" school in his neighborhood...furthering this scary notion of an educational "caste" system of sorts, rather than actually improving schools that are under performing. It's counterproductive, and the end result is punishment to the under performing schools. Get it?

To use your own earlier points as a starting point...
Quote:
so if a school last year had 4,000 students they get funded for 4,000 students at the beginning of this year. but if the reality is they have 3,600 students for this year at the end of the first grading frame, that school will LOSE funding. that has NOTHING to do with the performance of the FCAT standards. also if a school who had 4,000 students last year, but has 4,600 students this year, guess what? yup you figured it out, they get MORE money.

So, let's look at what the trends have been, shall we? School A reports poor numbers on the FCAT, receiving a score of "D" for that year. School B reports good FCAT scores, and recieves a score of "A" for that year. Thanks to the voucher system and school choice, as a result school B receives higher enrollment and hence more funding the following year. Do you now see the correlation between the FCAT, school rankings, and school funding? It can get even more detailed than this, but I do not have the time or the energy right now.

Now, when it came to Chiles, he did quite a bit for education in Florida, but this argument isn't really about him. I would, though, love to see this evidence of Chiles cutting ALL of this budget money for education previously, because I have not seen or read anything like that at all. If you have any links to articles that support this, I would love to see them. Chiles supported the lottery as supplemental funding to the school budget, such as to help pay for textbooks. Was it perfect? No, it wasn't, I agree. However, from what I can recall and of what I have read I have never seen evidence of Chiles slashing the education budget, so once again, prove me wrong with some evidence. :) However, Jeb did not really increase education spending by all that much in his first term if you take inflation into account, actually. Hardly an improvement over Chiles, even so. Here's a tidbit for ya.
http://www.sptimes.com/2002/02/17/State/Bush_oversells_his_sp.shtml

As for Jeb Bush being "blameless" and simply following federal regulations regarding our current standardized testing/school ranking format, you're dead wrong. Those were the precise views that Jeb proposed when running for Governor in 1998 versus Buddy McKay.
Quote:
Bush's school testing program has come under fire from critics as well. Under his proposal, schools would be tested yearly to measure their learning and improvement. Schools would be graded on the standard A-F scale, with the results being sent to parents and posted on the Internet as well. Those schools which score higher and show greater improvement will receive additional funding, while those schools which continually fall below state standards will not. Schools which do not meet state educational guidelines may not have the resources available to make needed improvements, leading to a cycle of mediocrity and chronic underachievement. Taking additional state money to allow students to attend private schools would further undermine any chance for these schools to improve their performance.

That was from a "on the issues" article contrasting the two candidates for the Governor race in 1998.

Furthermore, my age has nothing to do with this debate, except for the fact that I shared what it was like to have to take the damn FCAT. It has no bearing on my knowledge of the facts, because I can read, and I do, believe it or not. Scary, I know, a young person actually caring and reading up on issues, I thought we were all still too busy drinking and being generally wasteful. I take it upon myself to research the issues, and the nature of education in the state of FL was of particular interest to me at an age where I was a fairly unwilling consumer. It doesn't matter that I was six years old when Chiles entered office, and it doesn't negate my opinion. Would your opinions on the political climate of the 1960's change for that very reason? No. So, if you're going to have this pleasant discourse with me, then please leave that at the door. And also, just to be a jerk, it's Lawton Chiles.
#32 Feb 14 2008 at 11:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Queen Alixana wrote:
Singdall, you remind me of someone who reads what people posts, but rather than actually reading the message, you draw conclusions about what is being said and base all of your points on that.
Gbaji?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#33 Feb 14 2008 at 11:14 PM Rating: Good
Nah, I wasn't making a jab at anyone in particular, just totally failed to have a good opening sentence. :P I wrote it last and it shows...time for bed.
#34 Feb 15 2008 at 1:58 AM Rating: Good
I think all of you guys are totally missing the point.

Though, with Singdall participating in the discussion, it's hard not to, I grant you that, but still. While you're there arguing about what exams kids should vomit at school and what not, shadow has learnt how to use a spellcheck!!

I know, I know, crazy stuff. Where did the Lebonon go? Did it get boared? Is the spellcheck majority working hard for you?
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#35 Feb 15 2008 at 2:37 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Is the spellcheck majority working hard for you?


Of coarse.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#36 Feb 15 2008 at 2:42 AM Rating: Decent
*****
12,975 posts
As a kid who grew up taking that test, I have to say they put way too much emphasis on it.

Really, they do spend an unnecessary amount of time reviewing/practicing/etcetera for it when it isn't that difficult a test for anybody who had actually been paying attention. I'm not the sharpest pencil in the box and I never once came anywhere near failing it. Maybe because I didn't sleep in class?


I can understand the want to do away with standardized testing, but at the same time, let's not make it out to be some type of monster that it isn't. Smiley: rolleyes

Edit: By the way, Nexa, the Brak CDs are nothing compared to how many comedy skit cuts I have in my car. You have nothing to be ashamed of. Smiley: tongue

Edited, Feb 15th 2008 5:44am by Zackary
#37 Feb 15 2008 at 3:23 AM Rating: Good
I'm a big fan of standarized tests, but I'm biased. I "tested" well in highschool, and because of this got a letter from UNH telling me I could skip a introductory math class because of my SAT scores.

And, another letter, saying I had to take remedial math classes because of my low grades in math.

However, I didn't go to UNH though, so I never actually had to make a choice between the two.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#38 Feb 15 2008 at 3:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Zackary wrote:

Edit: By the way, Nexa, the Brak CDs are nothing compared to how many comedy skit cuts I have in my car. You have nothing to be ashamed of. Smiley: tongue


One of my friends had the entire "Don't Touch Me" song as her answering machine message...haha, I loved it, but hated waiting five minute or whatever to leave a message.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#39 Feb 15 2008 at 3:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
I'm told they don't have standardized testing in evil villain school, so Hannah should be all set.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#40 Feb 15 2008 at 4:22 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Nexa wrote:
I'm told they don't have standardized testing in evil villain school, so Hannah should be all set.

Nexa


Why would she need to go to that school? Shouldn't she be the teacher?
#41 Feb 15 2008 at 6:18 AM Rating: Decent
Schools that are under performing on the FCAT are schools that are in the most need of funding; however, all of the "bonus" money gets distributed to the "good" schools, most of which have far better funding than the "bad' schools to begin with, which lessens the "bad" schools' chances of becoming on par with the "good" schools. So, in what is the available pool of funding, you have more money going to the programs that need it the least, bonus or not.

here is a history lesson for you.

the school funding was in place BEFORE the FCAT requirements.

the school funding has not really changed. again you miss the point. each FL PUBLIC school gets "paid" per student attending.

Actually, the fact that the pay is tied to teachers rather than the program is far worse and is indicative of how messed up the system truly is. Force teachers to neglect real curriculum, and focus solely on the FCAT and reducing your child's education, and get a PAY BONUS! That is such a slap in the face to the hard-working teachers who already face an uphill battle, and it destroyed a lot of morale in FL teachers. To further expound on this, in Florida, schools are also on a tiered system of A,B,C,D,and F, which is based off of FCAT scores.

have i not said that this is what is wrong with the FCAT?

get a clue.

Furthermore, Jeb has always endorsed public tax dollars for private schools, as well as vouchers so that students ensure attending the "good" private schools and shunning the "bad"- and of course, school choice so that little Timmy can attend an "A" school instead of the "F" school in his neighborhood...furthering this scary notion of an educational "caste" system of sorts, rather than actually improving schools that are under performing. It's counterproductive, and the end result is punishment to the under performing schools. Get it?

ok lets try this again.

the voucher system allows special needs children, not all children the ability to participate in a school that has the "programs" to fill the needs of that child. how do i know? simple my daughter is a part of that system. she no longer goes to public schools as they do not have the abilities or the teachers or the programs to fill the needs of my daughter, but the local private school does and the state pays a portion of her tuition, not even 1/3 just FYI. the rest of my daughters tuition comes out of MY POCKET and yeah i still pay taxes for that.

this has nothing to do with moving child A out of school with an "F" rating and everything to do with helping child B with special needs get into a program that can help those needs.

so no punishment is done here and it is NOT counterproductive in any way.

So, let's look at what the trends have been, shall we? School A reports poor numbers on the FCAT, receiving a score of "D" for that year. School B reports good FCAT scores, and recieves a score of "A" for that year. Thanks to the voucher system and school choice, as a result school B receives higher enrollment and hence more funding the following year. Do you now see the correlation between the FCAT, school rankings, and school funding? It can get even more detailed than this, but I do not have the time or the energy right now.

again good try, but you can not just pick up and leave a school you are slated for just because you do not like that school. you are free and welcome to PAY to go to an other school or a public school, but the state will not just allow your child to up and leave a bad school to go to a "better" school just because you do not like it. thus the schools with the higher ratings DO NOT get more students then the schools with lower ratings and thus their budget is not affected.

good try though.

Schools which do not meet state educational guidelines may not have the resources available to make needed improvements, leading to a cycle of mediocrity and chronic underachievement. Taking additional state money to allow students to attend private schools would further undermine any chance for these schools to improve their performance.

again this is not the case, see above. also the total number of children per school that get the vouchers is so small as to NOT make a difference in the overall budget of the school.

Furthermore, my age has nothing to do with this debate, except for the fact that I shared what it was like to have to take the damn FCAT. It has no bearing on my knowledge of the facts, because I can read, and I do, believe it or not. Scary, I know, a young person actually caring and reading up on issues, I thought we were all still too busy drinking and being generally wasteful. I take it upon myself to research the issues, and the nature of education in the state of FL was of particular interest to me at an age where I was a fairly unwilling consumer. It doesn't matter that I was six years old when Chiles entered office, and it doesn't negate my opinion. Would your opinions on the political climate of the 1960's change for that very reason?

yes your AGE has a lot to do with things.

as for the direct challenge to my "view" of how things were in the 60s i am damn sure they would be different if i were old enough and active in that time of history, just as my POV of things in the 70s and 80s is i can bet different then yours who was not even alive in that time.

what you know about the late 80s and early 90s you have READ, i have LIVED. there is a huge insurmountable difference that you will not understand until you are about 10 years older then you are now.

As for Chiles cutting the education budget, look into the implementation of the lottery system in FL along with the loss of revenue it caused in the late 80s and early 90s.

again this is why we have early release on Wed. and why we have rolling starting/ending schedules for primary, middle, and highschools so you can use 1 bus for all 3 schools.
#42 Feb 15 2008 at 12:58 PM Rating: Good
I'm at work right now, which limits the amount of time I can reply to your post. However, I will update later with a more thorough response.

One thing though,I undertsand the funding was in place before FCAT and the NCLB- my point is the effect it can have on ratings. I agree with you on vouchers, but at least in my county I know that school choice is very easy to implement. As an example, we have 2 flagship high schools that are the two largest and by far have the most students from other districts. The other four high schools are so terrible that their population pales in comparison, despite being located in a fairly population-dense area.

Chiles was Governor from 1991-1998 and I could never see any evidence of budget cuts on education. Before then, he was in the US Senate so I really am not sure how he was slashing FL Education budgets in the late 1980's. I actually searched many resources last night attempting to locate this evidence, because I'd like to be proven wrong if I am. I understand that Chiles was a well-liked Governor and many sources are inherently biased, but I still came up empty handed. So, if you know the resource that you got this from, please share.

As an aside, you may have lived through things, but experience alone also does not provide all of the facts. Experiences by themselves are usually not sufficient arguments as they are generally lacking in irrefutable evidence. If you don't believe me, feel free to read up on the countless amounts of psychological research that has been done on eyewitness events, autobiographical accounts, etc. where people have been wrong, even though that are "100%" something did or did not occur. However, I agree that my viewpoints, having been a child at the time and obtaining the majority of my knowledge through research, would not necessarily be the most informed. Where research alone fails, in this particular domain I usually ask my mother, who has always paid attention to all the political issues/trends/events (especially in education, as a school social worker) so that I can get the "experience" perspective.
#43 Feb 15 2008 at 1:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Nadenu, Goblin in Disguise wrote:
Nexa wrote:
I'm told they don't have standardized testing in evil villain school, so Hannah should be all set.

Nexa


Why would she need to go to that school? Shouldn't she be the teacher?


One day, sure, but you have to have the proper certification to run your own volcano lair these days. You can't even get a decent crocodile trainer to populate your moat without the proper paperwork. Also: FORGET about getting a decent super hero to be your arch nemesis...without the background work you end up stuck with the Car Wash Ranger or Super-Boy-Scout Door Opener. I won't have my baby wasting that maniacal laughter on door slamming, no sir.

Red tape...even in the evil villain world.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 303 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (303)