Singdall, you remind me of someone who reads what people posts, but rather than actually reading the message, you draw conclusions about what is being said and base all of your points on that.
Quote:
That's right, allocating available funding from schools that need it most to ones that need it the least is a great idea.
Let me spell out what my statement meant, since evidently I am required to do this for anything I say.
Schools that are under performing on the FCAT are schools that are in the
most need of funding; however, all of the "bonus" money gets distributed to the "good" schools, most of which have far better funding than the "bad' schools to begin with, which lessens the "bad" schools' chances of becoming on par with the "good" schools. So, in what is the available pool of funding, you have more money going to the programs that need it the least, bonus or not.
Actually, the fact that the pay is tied to
teachers rather than the program is far worse and is indicative of how messed up the system truly is. Force teachers to neglect
real curriculum, and focus solely on the FCAT and reducing your child's education, and get a PAY BONUS! That is such a slap in the face to the hard-working teachers who already face an uphill battle, and it destroyed a lot of morale in FL teachers. To further expound on this, in Florida, schools are also on a tiered system of A,B,C,D,and F, which is
based off of FCAT scores. Furthermore, Jeb has always endorsed public tax dollars for private schools, as well as vouchers so that students ensure attending the "good" private schools and shunning the "bad"- and of course, school choice so that little Timmy can attend an "A" school instead of the "F" school in his neighborhood...furthering this scary notion of an educational "caste" system of sorts, rather than actually
improving schools that are under performing. It's counterproductive, and the end result is
punishment to the under performing schools. Get it?
To use your own earlier points as a starting point...
Quote:
so if a school last year had 4,000 students they get funded for 4,000 students at the beginning of this year. but if the reality is they have 3,600 students for this year at the end of the first grading frame, that school will LOSE funding. that has NOTHING to do with the performance of the FCAT standards. also if a school who had 4,000 students last year, but has 4,600 students this year, guess what? yup you figured it out, they get MORE money.
So, let's look at what the trends have been, shall we? School A reports poor numbers on the FCAT, receiving a score of "D" for that year. School B reports good FCAT scores, and recieves a score of "A" for that year. Thanks to the voucher system and school choice, as a result school B receives higher enrollment and hence more funding the following year. Do you now see the correlation between the FCAT, school rankings, and school funding? It can get even more detailed than this, but I do not have the time or the energy right now.
Now, when it came to Chiles, he did quite a bit for education in Florida, but this argument isn't really about him. I would, though,
love to see this evidence of Chiles cutting ALL of this budget money for education previously, because I have not seen or read anything like that at all. If you have any links to articles that support this, I would love to see them. Chiles supported the lottery as
supplemental funding to the school budget, such as to help pay for textbooks. Was it perfect? No, it wasn't, I agree. However, from what I can recall and of what I have read I have never seen evidence of Chiles slashing the education budget, so once again, prove me wrong with some evidence. :) However, Jeb did not really increase education spending by all that much in his first term if you take inflation into account, actually. Hardly an improvement over Chiles, even so. Here's a tidbit for ya.
http://www.sptimes.com/2002/02/17/State/Bush_oversells_his_sp.shtml As for Jeb Bush being "blameless" and simply following federal regulations regarding our current standardized testing/school ranking format, you're dead wrong. Those were the
precise views that Jeb proposed when running for Governor in 1998 versus Buddy McKay.
Quote:
Bush's school testing program has come under fire from critics as well. Under his proposal, schools would be tested yearly to measure their learning and improvement. Schools would be graded on the standard A-F scale, with the results being sent to parents and posted on the Internet as well. Those schools which score higher and show greater improvement will receive additional funding, while those schools which continually fall below state standards will not. Schools which do not meet state educational guidelines may not have the resources available to make needed improvements, leading to a cycle of mediocrity and chronic underachievement. Taking additional state money to allow students to attend private schools would further undermine any chance for these schools to improve their performance.
That was from a "on the issues" article contrasting the two candidates for the Governor race in 1998.
Furthermore, my age has
nothing to do with this debate, except for the fact that I shared what it was like to have to take the damn FCAT. It has no bearing on my knowledge of the facts, because I can
read, and I do, believe it or not. Scary, I know, a young person actually
caring and reading up on issues, I thought we were all still too busy drinking and being generally wasteful. I take it upon myself to research the issues, and the nature of education in the state of FL was of particular interest to me at an age where I was a fairly unwilling consumer. It doesn't matter that I was six years old when Chiles entered office, and it doesn't negate my opinion. Would your opinions on the political climate of the 1960's change for that very reason? No. So, if you're going to have this pleasant discourse with me, then please leave that at the door. And also, just to be a jerk, it's Lawton
Chiles.