The end of NATO?Follow

1. I quite clearly stated Clinton had nothing to do with GW 1
2. Kosovo was a UN and EU driven involvement.


Wouyld you like to know how i know this? It because when i was sailing in my British warship off kosovo during the Balken crisis my ship had a UN flag flying next to the Royal Ensign, and the NATO emblem that all UK warships carry had been removed.

You see Singdall people who actually took part in asction have just a slight bit more of a clue as to what was going on that those who have never been anywhere near the action.

And i have the UN medal to prove it.

No i didn't i meerly said before anyone brought up GM1 and associated actions that they where a UN driven action.

you know the no fly zone and numerous UN driven embargo actions thoughout the Clinton Administration. I'm not sure how to answer that because you're not really saying anything that make even the remotest sence.

Are you somehow implying that ever American military Action should be NATO? or that American forgien policy should dictate how the govenment of say France should deal with a crisis in a part of the world they have no interest?

NATO is force that protects western Europe from attack from Eastern Europe, it was not designed to have members forced into offencive actions against thier own forgien policy.

Taken from the Treaty: They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defence

In order more effectively to achieve the objectives of this Treaty, the Parties, separately and jointly, by means of continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.

The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Neither is reading. But yes, incredibly nice guy if you can see past these things.

Which one? did it make more sence than the one i linked?