Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Reply To Thread

McCain and ?Follow

#127 Feb 11 2008 at 3:19 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Quote:
Sampley also runs Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain organization, which has been instrumental in exposing the fact that McCain's status as a war hero and the claim that he was tortured in Vietnam is a complete fabrication, as well as highlighting the fact that McCain poses as a veteran's advocate yet abandons them on every turnkey issue.



Lol. Well, he actually runs/ran the Vietnam Veterans against John Kerry organization, but that's kinda close, right? Some guy named John Kiley runs the one against John McCain.

That's not to say that Sampley doesn't have his issues with McCain, but to say it's the "same people" is a bit of a stretch.


I'm also unclear what this "proves" in anyone's minds. That these groups really are independent of the Republican election machine? Shocker!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#128 Feb 11 2008 at 3:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
No, really. Look it up. Sampley's had a hard-on for McCain for 25 years or so.

Dating back to McCain supporting the idea of opening diplomatic relations with Vietnam as a way of clarifying the POW/MIA count, instead of making a blanket assumption that there were still POWs being held.

Sampley has allegedly made a lot of money flogging the POW horse.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#129 Feb 11 2008 at 4:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
I'm also unclear what this "proves" in anyone's minds.
Not everything (or even most things) I post have a point or an agenda as you suggest. As often as not, they're posted simply to say "Hey, ain't that a corker?"

Edited, Feb 11th 2008 6:20pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#130 Feb 11 2008 at 4:56 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"...exposing the fact that McCain's status as a war hero and the claim that he was tortured in Vietnam is a complete fabrication..." --blogger

Lol, fact, huh? While Kerry's service in Vietnam may not have been heroic by Audie Murphy standards, McCain's stalwart courage in the face of brutal torture and refusal to dishonor himself and his comrades and country are a testament to the valor and gallantry of US servicemen in the finest tradition of honorable service to our nation.

I'd lay money this backfires on the Swiftboaters this time around.

Totem
#131 Feb 11 2008 at 6:18 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Totem wrote:
I'd lay money this backfires on the Swiftboaters this time around.
Why, because this time it's a righteous attack? I'm not a fan of the military and I'm all for freedom of expression, but it's shameful that anyone that has put their life on the line on the whim of the CoiC-du-jour should have to put up with people questioning their service and commitment outside a tribunal.
#132 Feb 11 2008 at 6:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I'd add that a discredited source is discredited, fully, no matter what their target. It's ridiculous to cheer them on when they go after Kerry and disregard them when they go after McCain.

Or vice versa, of course.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#133 Feb 11 2008 at 7:08 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
I'm also unclear what this "proves" in anyone's minds.
Not everything (or even most things) I post have a point or an agenda as you suggest. As often as not, they're posted simply to say "Hey, ain't that a corker?"


Sure. And I'm pointing out that "aint it a corker?" that the only thing this really shows us is that the swiftboat vets *weren't* some sort of Republican controlled entity as was wildly assumed during the 2004 election season.


Well, it also shows us that a small group of true crazies can hook up with an otherwise legitimate group of people and it neither disproves the issue that larger group cares about nor provides legitimacy to another issue that only the crazies care about...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#134 Feb 11 2008 at 7:13 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Samira wrote:
I'd add that a discredited source is discredited, fully, no matter what their target. It's ridiculous to cheer them on when they go after Kerry and disregard them when they go after McCain.

Or vice versa, of course.
And you posted this prescience before gbaji posted:

gbaji wrote:
Well, it also shows us that a small group of true crazies can hook up with an otherwise legitimate group of people and it neither disproves the issue that larger group cares about nor provides legitimacy to another issue that only the crazies care about...


Sammy is a witch!

Burn her!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#135 Feb 11 2008 at 7:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Sure, it's been a bit chilly lately. Bring on the bonfire.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#136 Feb 11 2008 at 7:19 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Samira wrote:
Sure, it's been a bit chilly lately. Bring on the bonfire.
If you need a succubus, pm me Smiley: sly
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#137 Feb 11 2008 at 7:22 PM Rating: Default
*****
16,160 posts
"I'm not a fan of the military..." --Flea

That explains a lot. Anybody who is not a "fan" of the military obviously has no idea what the military is all about, nor do they have a real appreciation for those vaunted freedoms of expression. After all, you couldn't be saying this openly except for those who have done what you are so clearly unwilling to do: serve their country in uniform.

Enjoy the taste of your **** sandwich, Flea. You certainly made yourself a juicy one.

Totem
#138 Feb 11 2008 at 7:25 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Nobby wrote:
Samira wrote:
I'd add that a discredited source is discredited, fully, no matter what their target. It's ridiculous to cheer them on when they go after Kerry and disregard them when they go after McCain.

Or vice versa, of course.
And you posted this prescience before gbaji posted:

gbaji wrote:
Well, it also shows us that a small group of true crazies can hook up with an otherwise legitimate group of people and it neither disproves the issue that larger group cares about nor provides legitimacy to another issue that only the crazies care about...



Lol. Yeah. I noticed that after I posted (was posting while working, so Samny posted while I was in the posting window I guess).


Heh. I'll still stick with my take on the issue. Obviously, any group attacking Kerry's record is going to be joined by every other group with a bone to pick with him regarding his military record actions, regardless of how ludicrous their own reasons may be. It's completely illogical to argue that if one of those sub-groups also attacks McCain that this is the same as the whole doing so, nor does it lend any legitimacy to either argument in either direction.


There are a lot of people who believe that airplanes can fly. While I'm sure that *some* of them believe that they fly because of pixie dust spread on the wings, proving them wrong does not prove that airplanes can't actually fly.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#139 Feb 11 2008 at 7:27 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/02/11/obama-s-pesky-muslim-problem.aspx

This places Obama's "Muslim problem" in a clearer light-- and refutes V's assertion.

Totem
#140 Feb 11 2008 at 7:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem's article wrote:
If Obama wins the Democratic nomination, he'll have plenty of time before Election Day to tell voters that he's been "a member of the same church, the same Christian church, for almost 20 years"--enough, I'm sure, to reach all but the most willful bigots (who probably wouldn't vote for him anyway).
[...]
Take Vicki Hercsky, 47, a teacher from Boca Raton, Florida. "Obama, I don't even know how he got where he is," she told me after a Rudy Giuliani event late last month. "Why do you say that?" I asked. "He's Muslim," she replied, matter-of-factly. I stammered. "Well, um, his father was raised Muslim but was an agnostic by the time Barack was born," I said. "Obama is a Christian." Hercsky wasn't swayed. "Yeah, but he has it in his blood," she said. "You can't take away what's given to you. It's given to you for a reason, and that's who you are. That's who he is." I'm not sure what she meant by "it," or "who he is"--and I'm not sure I want to know.
Heh.. the author states that only hard bigots aren't going to be swayed by Obama's claims to Christianity and then says "But what if that's not the case?"

Then he attempts to prove that people besides bigots might not be convinced with a woman who essentially says "He has that evil Muslim gene in his blood. God put that taint there for a reason, you know!" Does she somehow not count as a willful bigot? Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#141 Feb 11 2008 at 8:20 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Totem wrote:
That explains a lot. Anybody who is not a "fan" of the military obviously has no idea what the military is all about, nor do they have a real appreciation for those vaunted freedoms of expression. After all, you couldn't be saying this openly except for those who have done what you are so clearly unwilling to do: serve their country in uniform.
I'm not a fan of the institution, you obtuse ****. I would not join, nor could I encourage anyone else to. This doesn't mean in any sense, nor should it imply to anyone other than a complete ******, self righteous morons, or, by default, you, that I don't respect and admire anyone that chooses it as a profession. It's not the first time I've stated my view on the subject. To imply that as a citizen of a country trying to overcome terrorism back when you were still trying to pick precisely the right shade of pink polo that I don't know the weight of curtailed freedom shows how little you understand respect despite disagreement, and why you would espouse this kind of rhetoric.
#142 Feb 11 2008 at 8:49 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
16,160 posts
So you do respect and admire me. Why didn't you say so before? Playing coy, you little minx? After all, I made the military my profession for two decades.

Totem
#143 Feb 12 2008 at 6:08 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Nobby wrote:
Samira wrote:
Sure, it's been a bit chilly lately. Bring on the bonfire.
If you need a succubus, pm me Smiley: sly


Wouldn't that be an incubus? Or are you Brits just that emasculated?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#144 Feb 12 2008 at 8:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Samira wrote:
Nobby wrote:
Samira wrote:
Sure, it's been a bit chilly lately. Bring on the bonfire.
If you need a succubus, pm me Smiley: sly


Wouldn't that be an incubus? Or are you Brits just that emasculated?
Bewbs, silly witch
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#145 Feb 12 2008 at 9:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Nobby wrote:
Bewbs


I has them.

Succubus = not needed.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#146 Feb 12 2008 at 8:29 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Totem wrote:
So you do respect and admire me.
Not you so much as the idea of you. Smiley: lol
#147 Feb 12 2008 at 9:15 PM Rating: Excellent
After McCain started pulling ahead in the polls Matt Blunt Gov of Missouri decided not to run for re-election. I don't know about the rest of the country but some of us think there may be something there. Usually a Gov would not do this unless he thought he had a better deal in the works.
#148 Feb 12 2008 at 9:35 PM Rating: Decent
**
534 posts
McCain/Rice would counter a lot of the waves. Do you think Rice would make a good VP though?
#149 Feb 12 2008 at 9:40 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
McCain/Rice would counter a lot of the waves. Do you think Rice would make a good VP though?


Your retarded.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#150 Feb 13 2008 at 1:16 AM Rating: Decent
**
534 posts
Chill out I was just messing around, take the rusty fork out of your pants. If things keep going this way though huckabee might open up the possibility for a bid, though the conservative side does not seem to like him much better.

-spelling edit.

Edited, Feb 13th 2008 4:24am by kelpiso

Edited, Feb 13th 2008 4:25am by kelpiso
#151 Feb 13 2008 at 3:19 AM Rating: Good
****
4,396 posts
There is no way that he choses Huckabee. Thompson offers the same, and in a general election would fare better.

____________________________
I voted for the other guy.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 183 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (183)