Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

/sigh...clearly disappointedFollow

#1 Jan 16 2008 at 12:50 PM Rating: Good
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
I think we need to find more stuff for our legislators to do. They clearly have too much time on their hands.

HR 888
Quote:
Affirming the rich spiritual and religious history of our Nation's founding and subsequent history and expressing support for designation of the first week in May as "American Religious History Week" for the appreciation of and education on America's history of religious faith.


Oh good.

I didn't even notice this one get passed in December:HR 847

Quote:
Recognizing the importance of Christmas and the Christian faith

Resolved, That the House of Representatives--

(1) recognizes the Christian faith as one of the great religions of the world;

(2) expresses continued support for Christians in the United States and worldwide;

(3) acknowledges the international religious and historical importance of Christmas and the Christian faith;

(4) acknowledges and supports the role played by Christians and Christianity in the founding of the United States and in the formation of the western civilization;

(5) rejects bigotry and persecution directed against Christians, both in the United States and worldwide; and

(6) expresses its deepest respect to American Christians and Christians throughout the world.


This makes me tired.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#2 Jan 16 2008 at 1:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
They should have slipped in something about the Turks being genocidal maniacs.

Good Lord, they have damn near the entire Republican House roster on there as co-sponsors for the Christmas one. A pointless and meaningless pandering exercise. Few people want to be on record as voting against Christmas, after all. Still, a waste of time from all sides.

How come the Ramadan resolution was buried three times during the 109th Congress? Hastert didn't think Islam counted as a "Great Religion"? Jerk.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Jan 16 2008 at 2:13 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Honestly, I feel better when they're doing things like this than I do about most of the major legislative initiatives that have passed in the last decade or so.

Any time they aren't naming a bill after a dead child or a jingo is ok with me.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#4 Jan 16 2008 at 2:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
Honestly, I feel better when they're doing things like this than I do about most of the major legislative initiatives that have passed in the last decade or so.

Any time they aren't naming a bill after a dead child or a jingo is ok with me.

But naming it for an dead jew is OK?
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#5 Jan 16 2008 at 2:25 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Good Lord, they have damn near the entire Republican House roster on there as co-sponsors for the Christmas one. A pointless and meaningless pandering exercise. Few people want to be on record as voting against Christmas, after all. Still, a waste of time from all sides.


When will Congess stop cow towing to the special interests of Stephen Colbert and Bill O'Reilly? When!?!!
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#6 Jan 16 2008 at 3:19 PM Rating: Decent
Oh boy. Now those morons who think that this is a "Christian Nation" actually have a leg to stand on. Smiley: glare
#7 Jan 16 2008 at 3:25 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

But naming it for an dead jew is OK?


When the actual function is nothing, yes. When the actual function of law named "Liberty and Justice for All!" is warantless search and detention, it's a little more troubling.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#8 Jan 16 2008 at 8:05 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
They pass those sort of throwaway resolutions all the time in the House, in between naming Post Offices.
#9 Jan 16 2008 at 8:22 PM Rating: Decent
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
Whereas the United States Supreme Court has declared throughout the course of our Nation's history that the United States is `a Christian country', `a Christian nation', `a Christian people', `a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being', and that `we cannot read into the Bill of Rights a philosophy of hostility to religion';

There you have it, folks. Bend your knees and get to praying (but only to jeebus). The Supreme Court says so.

#10 Jan 16 2008 at 8:28 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Again, completely worthless. They can pass a simple resolution any time, for all sorts of inane reasons, only to note their official stance or feeling. It's a legislative post-it-note. I bet some asshat somewhere is up in arms about this for no reason.

Quote:
A simple resolution is a legislative proposal that does not require the approval of the other chamber or the signature of the President and does not have the force of law. Simple resolutions are used only to change the internal rules of one of the chambers of Congress or to express the sentiments of one of the houses.
#12 Jan 17 2008 at 3:12 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Youshutup wrote:
Well it's not worthless, it's very symbolic. It's like if someone were to erect (haha) a statue of a massive ***** in white house lawn, it tells people about the mental state of those in charge.


It's art, dammit. Smiley: mad
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 295 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (295)