As odd as this is, I think it's even odder that Mr. Alton is using this as a reason to not pass this "Human Embryology and Tissues Bill".
Quote:
David Alton, a member of the House of Lords, revealed their situation as a way of highlighting perceived shortcomings in the Human Embryology and Tissues Bill which is now going through Britain's Parliament.
He first heard of the twins' marriage in a conversation with a High Court judge, and initially raised the case in a House of Lords debate on December 10.
Alton said: "(The brother and sister) met later in life and felt an inevitable attraction, and the judge had to deal with the consequences of the marriage that they entered into and all the issues of their separation.
"I suspect that it will be a matter of litigation in the future if we do not make information of this kind available to children who have been donor-conceived."
I'm not saying it's impossible, but the possibility of 2 Donor-Conceived people Marrying has got to be slim, let alone 2 people Donor-Conceived by the same Donor.
It's certainly got to be as rare, if not more so, than 2 twins seperated at birth gettin' hitched.
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin