New Hampshire DebateFollow

Say what you will about Friedman. I don't really give a @#%^.

I'd imagine you don't, having just discovered who he was.



It's clear that God, Bob, or the Spaghetti Monster itself could descend from the sky, dummy slap you upside your @#%^ing head, and you'd still argue with me by saying I'm a poopy head and that I'm stupid "just because."

No, I'd argue with you by pointing how painfully clear it is that you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. Sorry that this isn't a forum where you can bluff by third grade research skills as education, but it's not. You may have taken a wrong turn during your FFXI item search and ended up here by mistake, I couldn't say. What I can say is that neither your feeble attempts at seeming to have an opinion of your own, nor your ill guided attempt to characterize me as a mean bully who won't listen reason are going to wash here.

I'm sure there are thousands of other forums where you could post this fucking tripe and people would think "hey, this guy knows what he's talking about, his opinion is valid". This just isn't one of them. Perhaps consider finding one.



There's no point in arguing with you about the validity of his ideas.

No, there isn't, because you aren't capable for a couple of reasons.

1. You can't argue about something you know absolutely nothing about, and:

2. I'm smarter than you to the same degree that you're smarter than an orange.



My original points were to: A.) show that libertarianism is still around and still played a roll in public policy making during the last couple of decades.


What the fuck are you thinking? Your post is still sitting there. Why not make up a truly outlandish lie if you're going to bother? I'd have some respect for you if you at least posted "My original point is that smoking crack and blowing sailors for quarters causes Autism." Sadly, though, you chose to go the "You just didn't understand the words that I wrote because I'm so rock fucking stupid that I couldn't communicate my one sentence point without a paragraph of meaningless wrong bullshit" route. Why? You're not saving face. You're not impressing anyone. You're falling into exactly the same tired cardboard cutout caricature of a dull insecure idiot who passes off other people's opinions as his own that we all expected you would.

Way to live up to expectations, donkey fellator.


And, after your horsesh*t response and wity come backs, B.) sought to prove that carter was not a @#%^ing monetarist! Both have been accomplished successfully.


You proved that Carter wasn't a monetarist (whatever you may think that means because you clearly still have no idea) by posting a Friedman quote about Carter? What the hell is it that you do where that would qualify as a standard of proof? Wait, you're not a journalist, are you?



Thanks for the entertainment *****.

Sure thing, monkey licker. If you miss it and I'm not around, you can simulate the experience by holding your ******* firmly in your left hand and then with your right hand lifting a running lawnmower up and repeatedly dropping it on your balls.

In fairness, though, it'd probably be less painful.



Edited, Jan 6th 2008 11:46pm by Smasharoo

Edited, Jan 6th 2008 11:47pm by Smasharoo