Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Guess the Caucus (Dem Edition)Follow

#1 Jan 02 2008 at 9:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Tomorrow is the opening day of Primary Season with the Iowa caucuses. While the Republican caucus is a "show up, cast ballot, go home" affair, the Democratic caucus is lengthy and silly. To steal from Electoral-Vote.com:
Quote:
[T]he Democrats come in and go to different corners of the room, one corner per candidate (if no octagonal rooms are available, they use two rectangular rooms), Then there is a plenary session in which a representative of each candidate makes a short pitch. These are followed by public voting. Candidates deemed not viable (i.e., getting less than 15% of the vote, are sent to the showers and their supporters get to pick a second choice. After the second round of caucuses, a final vote is taken and then delegates to county caucuses are chosen. In turn, these elect delegates to the district caucuses which elect delgates to the state caucus, which elects delegates to go to the DNC in Denver.
The upshot is that the second choice of second-tier candidates is significant since they eventually wind up voting for a first-tier candidate. The caucus method is also significant because only the die-hards bother to show up for the entire dog & pony show.

Who do you think will win the Iowa Caucus?
Clinton:7 (14.3%)
Obama:26 (53.1%)
Edwards:10 (20.4%)
One of the current 'Second-Tier' candidates:6 (12.2%)
Total:49
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#2 Jan 02 2008 at 9:26 AM Rating: Decent
Most people who I've talked to in Des Moines seem to think Obama is going to steal the whole damn thing. Which doesn't mean much considering these people said the same thing about Dean.

Thursday night should be interesting. Going to be hell getting out of downtown.

edit: I voted Obama and then Hillary will take second with a close call by Edwards.

Edited, Jan 2nd 2008 11:36am by Kaelesh
#3 Jan 02 2008 at 9:41 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Clinton has the ground game.

I'd like to see Obama win, but it's unlikely.

An Edwards 2nd would make things a little more interesting.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#4 Jan 02 2008 at 9:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm going to crib from Electoral-Vote.com again and note that many polled voters for second-tier candidates are claiming Edwards as their second choice. I don't know if it's true or not (or if it'll shake out that way at the actual event) but some of the first-tier polls are neck & neck so it might be interesting.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Jan 02 2008 at 10:01 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
I think Obama will be first out of the gates by winning the Iowa Causus. (though I think Edwards is more electable)
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#6 Jan 02 2008 at 12:45 PM Rating: Good
Clinton, all the way to the presidency even though she's not my favorite. But that ****** has legs.
#7 Jan 02 2008 at 3:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Palpitus wrote:
that ****** has legs.
Note to self.

Do not accept a 3some with Palpitus
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#8 Jan 02 2008 at 3:14 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I think Obama will be first out of the gates by winning the Iowa Causus.


While I personally hope that's true, and it's certainly close enough for anything, including an outright Edwards win to happen without too much of a shock, I think the Obama camp has a real problem with support among people who will actually show up to caucus. I'll admit I don't know enough about the Obama organization to really asses their ability to get people to the polls, but I'm familiar enough with the Ckinton org to state with a lot of confidence that Clinton's precinct captains will deliver, and so will Edwards' (Just likely a lot less voters). It's hard for me to buy that Obama has that same level of support in place, so for him to win, he really needs to be well ahead in demographics deeper than the 18-30 year olds who aren't going to show up. Ask Dean how well that sort of support works out.

Edited, Jan 2nd 2008 6:15pm by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#9 Jan 03 2008 at 6:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Zogby's final Iowa poll has Obama statistically ahead of both Edwards (4 points) and Clinton (8 points). It's interesting if only because the Des Moines Register ran a poll a few days ago saying about the same thing which was panned as an outlier.

Still no solid guesses from me. Asking your supporters to go out in the Iowa winter cold and spend three hours standing in room corners seems to blow any predictions out of the water.

Edited, Jan 3rd 2008 8:50am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Jan 03 2008 at 2:42 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Asking your supporters to go out in the Iowa winter cold and spend three hours standing in room corners seems to blow any predictions out of the water.


Right. Horse race polling in Iowa is useless in anything but the broadest terms. We can be fairly confident Dodd isn't going to walk away with it, but any of the three "actual" candidates could. Here's praying it's one with a ***** who isn't a darkie. I'd really like to not have a supreme court that rules there is no implied right to privacy in the next 20 years.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#11 Jan 03 2008 at 6:36 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
Obama time!
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#12 Jan 03 2008 at 6:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
And with about 80% in, CNN calls it for Obama (35%) with Edwards currently squeaking out a second place win over Clinton. I imagine that's got the potential to shift though since it's a single percentage.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#13 Jan 03 2008 at 6:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Wow. 7%+ win for Obama.

I wonder who the Richardson/Biden crowd will break for and if it'll shore up a red ribbon for Edwards
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#14 Jan 03 2008 at 7:20 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
If Obama wins in NH, it'll really get interesting. I for one welcome the potential for new overtly racist "issue ads" originating from a mysterious group in Arkansas.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#15 Jan 03 2008 at 7:29 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
I like Hillary ok, but Christ is she an uncharismatic orator.

Who does this even work on? Who is she connecting with here? I feel like I'm at a country club banquet or something watching her speak.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#16 Jan 03 2008 at 7:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smasharoo wrote:
I like Hillary ok, but Christ is she an uncharismatic orator.
Smiley: laugh

I listened with interest to Edwards and just got up from Clinton's speech, telling Flea to call me when Obama is on.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#17 Jan 03 2008 at 7:51 PM Rating: Decent
***
1,784 posts
Axelrod=Rove.
#18 Jan 03 2008 at 8:12 PM Rating: Good
Watching Obama's speech...wow.

Strongest speech out of the three, and he sounds presidential...I bet he just tipped the NH primary in his favor with that.

EDIT: Was it just me or did he sound a little bit like MLK Jr. in his tone of voice and inflections though?

Edited, Jan 3rd 2008 11:16pm by Nightsintdreams
____________________________
Proud citizen of Miranda.

-Currently on Pochacco Server of Hello Kitty Online.
#19 Jan 03 2008 at 8:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
The averages of the latest New Hampshire polls (at least the four most recent shown on Electoral-Vote) would put it Clinton 30 vs Obama 28. His Iowa win might give him the push he needs to take NH as well which would really be something.

If nothing else, I'm happy for his and Edwards' win because it keeps the field open and people talking. Nothing more dull than a done deal.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Jan 04 2008 at 9:13 AM Rating: Decent
Caucus took 2 hours last night at the Elementary School gym round the block from my house. We had 384 people there which is quite a difference from '04 when it was a mere 132.

To no ones surprise there, Obama (in the first round) had 161 people with Hill at 96, Edwards at 92, with Richardson and Dodd making up the rest. The later 2, not being viable, reshuffled into our groups with Clinton taking 98, Edwards 110 and Obama at 171. The rest chose to abstain.

Obama at 4 Delegates out of 9
Edwards with 3
Hillary at 2

The Edwards/Clinton threw me, I had it figured the other way around. Super Tuesday should be interesting.
#21 Jan 04 2008 at 9:16 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Man, American politics...sure is wacky.

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#22 Jan 04 2008 at 9:18 AM Rating: Decent
Princess Tare wrote:
Man, American politics...sure is wacky.



Of course. It's an old, broken system but no one can think of anything better, so we run with it.
#23 Jan 04 2008 at 9:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Princess Tare wrote:
Man, American politics...sure is wacky.
It is, but the Iowa caucus system exceptionally so. The rest of the primary season is just casting secret ballots with the only differences being that some states make you pre-register for your party and others (like Illinois) just ask you at the polling place which party's ballot you want.

Edited, Jan 4th 2008 11:30am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#24 Jan 04 2008 at 9:42 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
Caucus took 2 hours last night at the Elementary School gym round the block from my house. We had 384 people there which is quite a difference from '04 when it was a mere 132.
The turn out is encouraging. I hope it foreshadows lotsa dems getting out to vote when the election rolls around.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#25 Jan 04 2008 at 11:18 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Princess Tare wrote:
Man, American politics...sure is wacky.
It is, but the Iowa caucus system exceptionally so. The rest of the primary season is just casting secret ballots with the only differences being that some states make you pre-register for your party and others (like Illinois) just ask you at the polling place which party's ballot you want.

Edited, Jan 4th 2008 11:30am by Jophiel


So, does winning the caucus actually mean anything? Or is it just a fun way to kick off the "road to the White house"?
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#26 Jan 04 2008 at 11:30 AM Rating: Decent
Princess Tare wrote:
So, does winning the caucus actually mean anything? Or is it just a fun way to kick off the "road to the White house"?


In my cynical mind, not a damn thing but it's suppose to be a precursor to the Democratic National Convention, Gathering Delegates like acorns, hoping the DNC picks the least useless nominee.

In truth, it's a complicated system that was meant for a much, much smaller population. Delegates represent voters (caucus goers) and Iowa kind of sets the tone for the rest of the Caucuses (see: Super Tuesday) and the Nomineee with the most Delegates, are chosen as the parties Presidential Nominee. It's like a mini-election so to speak.

That's the best I can explain it. Smiley: frown
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 280 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (280)