Pseudo Child ****Follow

Whatever you want to call it, it was pretty funny.



To the topic at hand, the way in which the documents were obtained does kind of bother me. I read the second link, and found this excerpt to be quite...well, odd.Now, I remember my high school days, and even a good chunk of my middle school ones. Back in the tenth grade, I had a tough time with a girl whom I had been seeing for quite some time. My principal, a lady by the name of Anne Flag, used to go as far as to pull me out of classes that I had with the girl so that I wouldn't have to sit next to her. (And in my school, we almost always got seated in alphabetical order. I'm not going to post my last name, but for the sake of argument, let's say mine is "Pike." She was "Pikee.") This woman was really helpful towards me during the entire time, all while not being anything more than that.

I later went on to marry said girl. We've been together for 8 of my 23 years on this Earth. I imagine without Mrs. Flag, we'd have probably been at one another's throats and ended it years ago.

What I'm basically trying to say is, putting someone under investigation for being what sounds to me like a good principal is a little *****. I'm not going to say there's definitely more to it, but there most certainly seems to be a good possibility of it.

So, to you guys, which is worse:

Pasting kids' heads on nude adult bodies

or

Pasting adults' heads on nude kid bodies

I'd prefer to not defend a pedophile regardless of what the law says, but hey go for it.

Sounds good to me.

But hey, you defend the guy, when he gets off on a technicality, I hope he chooses to move into your neighborhood. I'm sure you'll let him play with YOUR kids or relatives, right?

You should watch more ****. Srsly.

As comfortably as I feel being around a straight woman. Hey; I meet the criteria for being sexually desirable to a straight woman, therefore we will necessarily have sex!

Goddamn... I've never heard such a confusion of the meaning of a word in my life. Learn to seperate necessary and sufficient conditions; learn the distinctions between some and all. Why do you feel that an individual who enjoys sexual pleasure from the idea of a child's body is going to be after every fucking child? To even harbor such distrust is as idiotic as a male hating homosexuals because he believes that he will be the object of desire for each and every one of them.

No, it is easier for you to live in a world with nice, abstract categories which can tell you when something is dangerous and evil, and to be destroyed. As easy as this is (and even helpful occasionally, for use in everyday life), using such things where the subject matter is weird and compilicated is about as useful as solving a jigsaw puzzle by rolling around the peices in glue, then mashing it together and proclaiming, "tada!" It fails in every way to encompass the problem in a meaningful way.

Even aside from all of that, aside from the unqualified prejudices, and the confusion, and the lack of empathy, there remains the question of the purpose of the law. And every individual is and ought to be entitled to the best possible legal representation and logical argument for his/her defense availible. If you begin to throw that away, then you dismiss the entire tradition of enlightened, liberal thinking which is the basis of our country.



At least he can only judge 1/12th of the defendant!

***



Is this a serious question?

Edited, Dec 30th 2007 1:25am by Pensive