Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

A dilemmaFollow

#1 Nov 03 2007 at 11:29 PM Rating: Good
***
3,829 posts
All right, I'm a bit torn here and could use some input.

I have--HAD--a friend. Primarily an online friend, but I met her and her husband in real life a couple times, and even once we stopped exchanging regular emails and chatting, we kept up with each other on LiveJournal. If you don't know how LJ works, you include people on your friends list and you can follow their journals (as long as they are not made private--and if they are, you can still follow them if you are on THEIR friends list.) Anyway, long story short, she died a couple months ago, and in order to keep her friends abreast of what was going on with regards to the inquiry into her death and to surround himself with the comfort of people who knew and cared about her, her husband took over and began posting to her LiveJournal.

Normally, this would be a red flag for me. A supposed loved-one suddenly intruding upon a supposedly deceased person's internet hang-out to watch the post-"death" fallout is a big sign of a Munchaussen-by-Internet death hoax. But no, there was a real obituary, a real memorial service, and I am acquainted with real people who attended the real memorial service, so it's not a hoax, it's the real deal.

Nevertheless, there is something about the way her husband behaves when posting to her LiveJournal that hits my "oh, brother! Smiley: rolleyes" buttons. Maybe I'm not giving him enough credit for the pain he's going through--I've never lost a beloved spouse and maybe it's 100% legitimate. But every post is, "God, I wish I had died instead!" and "Oh, I wish I were dead, she was my everything" and "I've got to have friends stay with me 24/7 now to make sure I don't harm myself" and blah blah sob emo sob blah.

I've expressed my sympathy to her husband, but beyond that, I really don't feel qualified to respond to him when he makes these posts. We weren't close enough for me to offer him more interactive comfort. So instead, I find myself getting increasingly uncomfortable whenever I see his posts. Maybe his grief is legit, but I don't feel like it's a grief that I should be privy to. Even though I really liked her, and enjoyed meeting her and her husband, I'm not close enough to him to share this grief.

And yet, I feel like a ***** for considering removing the journal that formerly belonged to her from my friends list so I don't have to see these posts anymore. Like I'm a cold-hearted hag for "abandoning" her husband when he's hurting, even though there is absolutely nothing I have to offer him by way of comfort.

So, what should I do? Just un-friend her journal and leave him to grieve surrounded by people much better qualified to help him than I am? Am I being a total ***** for considering it?

#2 Nov 03 2007 at 11:33 PM Rating: Good
You should let me have your account so I can read and respond to his posts.

I bet you wouldn't have to read many more of them.
#3 Nov 03 2007 at 11:54 PM Rating: Good
It could be he's using this journal as a crutch a kind of "pour your heart and soul" out thing. I'm with you, it does sound over dramatic but he did just lose his wife. It has got to be one of the hardest things ever to deal with. There isn't anything you can say that is going to help him at this point, the only thing that is going to help is time. I would suggest just staying away from that journal for a while if it really bothers you. Go back in a few weeks and check up to see if things have changed. Or just remove it all together as you were not close to him but you were to her.
#4 Nov 04 2007 at 12:21 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
The One and Only Katie wrote:
It could be he's using this journal as a crutch a kind of "pour your heart and soul" out thing. I'm with you, it does sound over dramatic but he did just lose his wife. It has got to be one of the hardest things ever to deal with.


I know. I feel like just an awful person for feeling this way, but for God's sake he's being a drama queen about it. I know if I lost Mr. Ambrya, it would hurt so badly that there would be moments where I sincerely wouldn't be sure how I would survive the pain. But I very much doubt I would need my friends to take going-on 3 months out of their lives to keep me on what amounts to a suicide watch. It just seems a smidge self-indulgent to me to carry on that way for so long.

#5 Nov 04 2007 at 12:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
He hasn't yet plucked up the courage to get laid.

Once that's sorted, he'll probably get a life.

Alternatively, he may just be a cUnt. Either way, ditch the journal.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#6 Nov 04 2007 at 2:03 AM Rating: Decent
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

And now you have brought your pain of having to read pointless, awful internet posts onto us.

Thanks for that.


#7 Nov 04 2007 at 2:14 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
I'd axe the journal. I'm sorry for the guy, sure, but I don't spend my time on the internet to deal with other people's problems. I'm here for the dick and fart jokes.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#8 Nov 04 2007 at 3:32 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
What Tare said. She's so eloquent!
#9 Nov 04 2007 at 3:37 AM Rating: Decent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
It is self indulgent but maybe that's what he needs to get on ok in his regular life. We all have entirely self-pitying feeling from time to time, and perhaps that's his only outlet. /shrug

You could just not read them, right?

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#10 Nov 04 2007 at 8:03 AM Rating: Good
****
6,760 posts
King Nobby wrote:
He hasn't yet plucked up the courage to get laid.

Once that's sorted, he'll probably get a life.

Alternatively, he may just be a cUnt. Either way, ditch the journal.


Smiley: nod

Could be he's trying to drum up enough sympathy from her on-line buddies in hopes one of him will give him a pity-romp.

But yeah, ditch the journal.
____________________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't really good for anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs.
#11 Nov 04 2007 at 8:27 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Ditch it. Tell him to go get laid and quit his *********
#12 Nov 05 2007 at 4:18 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
I would think it would take more than three months to get over a spouse's death. Hell, people mourn breakups longer than that. I would write him a nice note about how you hope he gets help soon, and kill the journal. However he deals with his pain is how he deals with it. It may be therapeutic for him to write it all out where her friends can see it, a link to her.

Not for you to judge, and not for you to read if you don't feel like it. Not a hard decision at all.
#13 Nov 05 2007 at 6:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I think he killed her and is trying to cover his tracks.

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#14 Nov 05 2007 at 6:07 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Maybe he's just trying to get sympathy sex.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#15 Nov 05 2007 at 6:08 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
No, really. Can you explain a little more about the "inquiry surrounding her death"?

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#16 Nov 05 2007 at 8:51 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Grief takes all forms. But because he is grieving, that doesn't mean that you are the sole sounding-board and comfort source for his grief. Go ahead and remove the journal from your friend list. I'm sure that there are others that have the same thoughts as you.
#17 Nov 05 2007 at 10:19 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Samira wrote:
No, really. Can you explain a little more about the "inquiry surrounding her death"?



She died pretty unexpectedly. Really, just out of the blue, one morning up and died. The day before, she'd been fine and posting about beads. There's been no "cause of death" established yet from the autopsy, and the toxicology is taking forever. Leading theory right now is that it's some drug interaction problem or accidental O.D. (she was on several kinds of medication, including some fairly hefty pain meds for some back trouble she was having) or some sort of complication resulting from a surgery she had a few months before she died (for the back trouble, if I recall correctly.)

So not a police inquiry or anything like that, no foul play. But there is a really big question mark in the "why" column.



Edited, Nov 5th 2007 10:20am by Ambrya
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 299 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (299)