Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Repeat of 04?Follow

#27 Oct 23 2007 at 6:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Game 1: Becket vs Francis
Winna: Beckett. If I have to explain why, you probably don't know much about baseball.

Game 2: Schilling vs Jiminez
Winna: Schilling. Schillings 10-2 in the playoffs, with an ERA just over 2. Jiminiz has thrown 8 walks & 10 strikeouts since his activation in August.

Now, I'll warrent that Daiske has been a bit shakey. However, don't forget he hit 1 home run while a Sabo Lion, so I'm sure the Rockies will fear his bat as much as they fear his gyro ball. And with that high altitude, it'll just carry farther! Smiley: clap
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#28 Oct 23 2007 at 6:29 PM Rating: Good
Omegavegeta wrote:

Game 2: Schilling vs Jiminez
Winna: Schilling. Schillings 10-2 in the playoffs, with an ERA just over 2. Jiminiz has thrown 8 walks & 10 strikeouts since his activation in August.


Uh, you mean Schilling, with an ERA near 3.50 this postseason, against Jiminez, with an ERA near 1.50? Schilling, who's allowing opposing hitters nearly a .300 average against Jiminez, who is holding batters steady at the Mendoza line? Schilling, who has already been too hittable and is going to be pitching with an even deader arm? He won't last through the fourth.

After Daisuke pitches game three in Colorado and gets run by the end of the third, Boston'll be counting on Beckett, on three days rest, to stop the bleeding. If he can't, series ends in five. If he can, it ends in six.

#29 Oct 23 2007 at 6:45 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Uh, you mean Schilling, with an ERA near 3.50 this postseason, against Jiminez, with an ERA near 1.50?


Impressive. A bunch of sluggers those Diamondbacks.



____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#30 Oct 23 2007 at 6:55 PM Rating: Good
Smasharoo wrote:
A bunch of sluggers those Diamondbacks.


Oh, yeah, I forgot that the D-Backs had nine players with double digit homerun totals while the BoSox had six.

Do you watch any teams other than Boston?
#31 Oct 24 2007 at 2:32 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Grandfather Barkingturtle wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:
A bunch of sluggers those Diamondbacks.


Oh, yeah, I forgot that the D-Backs had nine players with double digit homerun totals while the BoSox had six.

Do you watch any teams other than Boston?


Why would anyone do that? Smiley: confused

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#32 Oct 24 2007 at 12:59 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Oh, yeah, I forgot that the D-Backs had nine players with double digit homerun totals while the BoSox had six.


Really? Did they hit more doubles with men in scoring position while the moon was in the fifth house and the game was being attended by the Governor of Arizona?

Wouldn't it be better to just say "Well, yeah, that's true, but the Phillies weren't a bad hitting team" or something instead of spewing meaningless stats.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#33 Oct 24 2007 at 1:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Smasharoo wrote:
[b]
Wouldn't it be better to just say "Well, yeah, that's true, but the Phillies weren't a bad hitting team" or something instead of spewing meaningless stats.


Well, I was sort of saving the fact that the Phillies were an extremely productive club this year till after you commented on the D-Backs having no 100 RBI men. Way to fUck up our back-and-forth, though.

Guess I could have brought up how the Rockies have already beaten Beckett once this year in Boston, his first loss of the season, in fact, and chased him with ten hits and six runs.
#34 Oct 24 2007 at 1:49 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Guess I could have brought up how the Rockies have already beaten Beckett once this year in Boston, his first loss of the season, in fact, and chased him with ten hits and six runs.


Whatever. You're right, they own him. Talk is cheap though. Let's make it interesting. I propose we undertake a small wager, say your $5 amazon gift certificate against my $10 one.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#35 Oct 24 2007 at 2:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Smasharoo wrote:

Guess I could have brought up how the Rockies have already beaten Beckett once this year in Boston, his first loss of the season, in fact, and chased him with ten hits and six runs.


Whatever. You're right, they own him. Talk is cheap though. Let's make it interesting. I propose we undertake a small wager, say your $5 amazon gift certificate against my $10 one.


Life just isn't exciting enough without something riding on it. Talking the whole series, yes, I will take your generous bet.

I am so gonna buy a 2007 Red Sox press guide with my gift certificate, and then I'm gonna use it to wipe my ***.

Edited, Oct 24th 2007 3:07pm by Barkingturtle
#36 Oct 24 2007 at 3:12 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I am so gonna buy a 2007 Red Sox press guide with my gift certificate, and then I'm gonna use it to wipe my ***.


I already know what I'm getting.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#37 Oct 24 2007 at 3:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Smasharoo wrote:

I am so gonna buy a 2007 Red Sox press guide with my gift certificate, and then I'm gonna use it to wipe my ***.


I already know what I'm getting.


Coincidentally, he has a better chance of making it four innings against the Rockies than Daisuke.
#38 Oct 24 2007 at 4:03 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


Coincidentally, he has a better chance of making it four innings against the Rockies than Daisuke.


You're crazily underestimating his stuff. If he had gone to an NL team instead of an AL East team, he'd have 15 wins and a lower ERA than all of the Rockies starting pitchers.

Oh wait.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#39 Oct 24 2007 at 7:51 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Quote:
Repeat of 04?


This.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 331 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (331)