My first Republican rated higher than his first Democrat!
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Hey look! A politics thread!
Hey look! A politics thread!Follow
Are you calling me a partisan robot?? 
My first Republican rated higher than his first Democrat!
My first Republican rated higher than his first Democrat!
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Are you calling me a partisan robot
Nah, robots don't have mommy issues.
:)
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
If you're a mindless partisan robot that would answer every question with the verbatim party line that even Fundamentalists roll their eyes at, I can't imagine what else could possibly happen.
So... ah... All Dems then all Pubs in your list, right?
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Dodd @43 for me, with Obama/Clinton/Kucinich tied at 40. If anything it made it harder for me to decide x_x
Huh.
Noam Chomsky 45
Howard Zinn 44
Hugo Chavez 42
Fidel Castro 40 (isn't he dead?)
Lev Trotsky 35
Margret Sanger 33
Emanuel Kant 31
Karl Marx 30
Rene Descartes 28
Franklin Roosevelt (He's totally dead, this thing's ******* 23
John Kennedy 18
James Carter 14
Micheal Dukakis 14
Ralph Nader 9
Elizabeth, Queen of England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales and France (wtf??) 8
Anne Heche 5
Micheal Richards 5
Capitan Morgan 4
Noam Chomsky 45
Howard Zinn 44
Hugo Chavez 42
Fidel Castro 40 (isn't he dead?)
Lev Trotsky 35
Margret Sanger 33
Emanuel Kant 31
Karl Marx 30
Rene Descartes 28
Franklin Roosevelt (He's totally dead, this thing's ******* 23
John Kennedy 18
James Carter 14
Micheal Dukakis 14
Ralph Nader 9
Elizabeth, Queen of England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales and France (wtf??) 8
Anne Heche 5
Micheal Richards 5
Capitan Morgan 4
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Hmm, it seems that I can either go with Rudy or Obama.
Odd.
Odd.
Only a 5 for Anne Heche?
I'd have figured that she had the clinically insane vote locked up.
I'd have figured that she had the clinically insane vote locked up.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Wow, apparetly I'm a mindless partisan robot.
Kucinich with 39. Not a surprise, every similar quiz I take matches up with him, and I would prefer him if he could win. Apparently we disagree on Immigration and the Death Penalty.
But I disagreed on Immigration with all of them except for Tom Tancredo.
But I disagreed on Immigration with all of them except for Tom Tancredo.
The Glorious GitSlayer wrote:
Wow, apparetly I'm a mindless partisan robot.
That's ok, according to the results, I am as well. I just figure that it's not my fault if so many people in one party happen to come to the right conclusion as I did. Enlightenment isn't for everyone folks.
Nexa
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.â€
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
Just randomly assigned choices at max importance level, on my second try there was interspersing of GOP and Dem, so apparently it doesn't assign a party first then points second.
Just randomly assigned choices at max importance level, on my second try there was interspersing of GOP and Dem, so apparently it doesn't assign a party first then points second.
Good work. I've been curious to see if the sun ever rises at midnight while a wolverine gnaws on your ********** Look into that for us.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Edwards at 41, Dodd at 39 and then Barack and Hilary tied at 38. At one point I would always match up to Kuchinich, but I guess I outgrew the Smurfs. I agree a lot with Edwards on paper, I just wish he wasn't so patently unqualified.
I just wish he wasn't so patently unqualified.
It's completely, utterly, impossible for anyone other than someone who's worked in the highest levels of the Executive to be "qualified" for the job. It's not like the day to day grind of presiding over Arkansas' monthly chicken output and cousin marriage rate somehow makes one more ready to lead the most powerful nation on Earth than being a trial lawyer does.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Quote:
Capitan Morgan 4
Weren't we drinking the Captain that first night in Chicago? Or was the tequila?
Is it really that shocking that I don't remember?
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.
Atomicflea wrote:
Edwards at 41, Dodd at 39 and then Barack and Hilary tied at 38. At one point I would always match up to Kuchinich, but I guess I outgrew the Smurfs. I agree a lot with Edwards on paper, I just wish he wasn't so patently unqualified.
But on the plus side, he's got great hair!
Sorry. Couldn't help myself there...
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Smasharoo wrote:
Just randomly assigned choices at max importance level, on my second try there was interspersing of GOP and Dem, so apparently it doesn't assign a party first then points second.
Good work. I've been curious to see if the sun ever rises at midnight while a wolverine gnaws on your ********** Look into that for us.
I know you're just being a jackass, but that is actually a rather feasible situation.
Jon Stewart
Score: 587
Joe Biden
Score: 30
John Edwards
Score: 27
Hillary Clinton
Score: 27
Barack Obama
Score: 27
Dennis Kucinich
Score: 24
...
Mitt Romney (first GOP)
Score: 22
I guess that's not much of a surprise.
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
But on the plus side, he's got great hair!
Ir's held up by the force of his conviction to help the poor, you know.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Smasharoo wrote:
It's completely, utterly, impossible for anyone other than someone who's worked in the highest levels of the Executive to be "qualified" for the job. It's not like the day to day grind of presiding over Arkansas' monthly chicken output and cousin marriage rate somehow makes one more ready to lead the most powerful nation on Earth than being a trial lawyer does.
IMHO,If Guliani is the Pubbie nom, I think the only person with a cult of personality strong enough to have an icicle's chance in hell would be Billary.
But I'm just a girl in the world. You can write me off.
This thing is FANTASTIC!
Of course the quality of the real match for your own beliefs relies on the quality of the research on the candidates, and the set-up of the quiz. However! For the huge mass of citizens that don't follow politics much, or know much about all the candidates, this thing is just a huge godsend.
I really believe that it can (shallowly?) summarize all the candidates' positions on big issues in relation to how you feel about them. When you can so easily find a candidate that is the best fit for your own beliefs on several issues, It would be a great incentive to vote.
I'd be so happy if something like this was done for Australian politics, especially since voting is compulsory here.
The quiz let me fill in the issues section without supplying any of the demographic information up the top.
Apparently I'd best vote for Chris Dodd (45), then Dennis Kucinich, Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama. I've never heard of the former two. The latter two are well known of in Oz.
P.S. I wanted to bring this thread to the OOT, but I haven't figured out how to link threads yet, so I just outright stole the link and posted it under my own name, to steal Nexa's glory.
Edited, Oct 18th 2007 9:07am by Aripyanfar
Of course the quality of the real match for your own beliefs relies on the quality of the research on the candidates, and the set-up of the quiz. However! For the huge mass of citizens that don't follow politics much, or know much about all the candidates, this thing is just a huge godsend.
I really believe that it can (shallowly?) summarize all the candidates' positions on big issues in relation to how you feel about them. When you can so easily find a candidate that is the best fit for your own beliefs on several issues, It would be a great incentive to vote.
I'd be so happy if something like this was done for Australian politics, especially since voting is compulsory here.
The quiz let me fill in the issues section without supplying any of the demographic information up the top.
Apparently I'd best vote for Chris Dodd (45), then Dennis Kucinich, Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama. I've never heard of the former two. The latter two are well known of in Oz.
P.S. I wanted to bring this thread to the OOT, but I haven't figured out how to link threads yet, so I just outright stole the link and posted it under my own name, to steal Nexa's glory.
Edited, Oct 18th 2007 9:07am by Aripyanfar
Aripyanfar the Eccentric wrote:
I'd be so happy if something like this was done for Australian politics, especially since voting is compulsory here.
Are you a Twatting Cnut?
| Yes : |    | 0 (0.0%) |
| No : | | 2 (25.0%) |
| Only on Tuesdays : | | 6 (75.0%) |
| Total: | 8 |
If you answered "Yes" or "Only on Tuesdays", you should vote for John Howard!
If you answered "No", you should vote for the other guy who visits strip bars!
Voila! Ask and you shall receive...
pretty neat..
I had Dodd, followed by Biden, then Clinton.
my Republican family would be ashamed....
Edited, Oct 18th 2007 8:05am by TidusBlue
I had Dodd, followed by Biden, then Clinton.
my Republican family would be ashamed....
Edited, Oct 18th 2007 8:05am by TidusBlue
Twizzle wrote:
[Tare's a ] syrup slurper.
I love the sight of morning wood in the morning.
Monsieur RedPhoenixxx wrote:
Aripyanfar the Eccentric wrote:
I'd be so happy if something like this was done for Australian politics, especially since voting is compulsory here.
Poll Removed: No more than one per thread, please!
If you answered "Yes" or "Only on Tuesdays", you should vote for John Howard!
If you answered "No", you should vote for the other guy who visits strip bars!
Voila! Ask and you shall receive...
Woot!
Thanks so much!
FYI I shall be voting for the strip club guy, on my preferences. First preference goes to Greens or Democrats, depending. John Howard is an outright criminal who has breached international law and human rights so much it's not funny....and that's even BEFORE he started in with "anti-terrorism" measures.
MoebiusLord the Irrelevant wrote:
Twizzle wrote:
[Tare's a ] syrup slurper.
I love the sight of morning wood in the morning.
What happens if you get morning wood and it's after 12?
/brain explodes
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
Recent Visitors: 344
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (344)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Hey look! A politics thread!
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC