There's also a large difference between people having a discussion about how and when to best use some computer dohicky, and someone else being a total asshole.
Don't strain yourself thinking about it though...
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- My latest computer insanity
My latest computer insanityFollow
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
There's also a large difference between people having a discussion about how and when to best use some computer dohicky, and someone else being a total @#%^.
You have proved that beyond any doubt, Skippy.
Edited, Oct 17th 2007 11:20pm by Smasharoo
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
The Nadenu of Doom wrote:
Nope, still don't understand any of this.
Check!
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
Tare wrote:
Nads wrote:
Nope, still don't understand any of this.
Check!
Girls are so cute when they plead ignorance about computer thingamajigs.
<---- truly ignorant.
YAY!
YAY!
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
raid 1/0 doesn't work with less than 4 disks (afaik if its done with 2 it's just mirroring) and capacity can only be added in pairs of disks if that's what you were asking Nadenu of Doom so 4->6->8 and so on with regards to adding disks.
raid 0 vs. raid 5 is a very different beast in my experience (by a fairly large margin) even with great accelerators in both circumstances.
just take a look at these links in particular file server, database and workstation charts
Raid0
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/07/02/raid_scaling_charts/page11.html
Raid5
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/08/07/raid_scaling_charts/page7.html
which mimic my own findings, there is a reason Raid5 is not suggested as best practices for i/o intensive applications
You do loose a lot of storage with Raid0/1 but in the days of terrabyte drives that's not too much of a concern, even SAS 15,000 rpm drives aren't as expensive as the SCSI 10,000 rpm drives of yore once were
raid 0 vs. raid 5 is a very different beast in my experience (by a fairly large margin) even with great accelerators in both circumstances.
just take a look at these links in particular file server, database and workstation charts
Raid0
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/07/02/raid_scaling_charts/page11.html
Raid5
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/08/07/raid_scaling_charts/page7.html
which mimic my own findings, there is a reason Raid5 is not suggested as best practices for i/o intensive applications
You do loose a lot of storage with Raid0/1 but in the days of terrabyte drives that's not too much of a concern, even SAS 15,000 rpm drives aren't as expensive as the SCSI 10,000 rpm drives of yore once were
Recent Visitors: 242
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (242)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- My latest computer insanity
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC