Totem wrote:
Another reason for concern is what is kept at Barksdale AFB. It's one thing to fly weapons on an old (even if upgraded) B-52, but the stealth bombers are kept at Barksdale. If a combat sortie involving strategic bombers carrying nuclear weapons were to take place, Barksdale is where it would start out. Note that in peace time (read non-strategic war like WW3, not a regional war like Iraq) nuclear weapons are placed far apart from the delivery systems, hence the Tomahawk missles are stored in North Dakota and the planes to get them to the theater of operations are kept in Lousiana.
I don't post here. Mostly because I think you guys are animals and would quite simply, tear me apart. I'm smart enough to realize that if I don't feel comfortable in a certain forum, I shouldn't post there and make myself an easy target. However, this post intrigues me. I'm inclined to wonder the same things Totem is, not because of what proof we have of the matter, but because of the apparent total lack of attention the media has given the matter.
Even so, Totem, I'm a bit confused by the part of your story I quoted. It doesn't quite jive with me for one reason. The primary home base of the US military's premiere stealth bomber, the B-2, is not Barksdale, but is in fact,
Whiteman AFB in Missouri I'm not an expert on Barskdale, or the Air Force in general, but Barskdale is quoted as being
"Home to the 2nd Bomb Wing and the Mighty 8th Air Force", composed primarily of B-52 bombers.
My point is that, if indeed we were going to set up some covert nuclear bombing run, why would the U.S government put on a show with the B-52s. Wouldn't an impending strike from a B-2, one which would be almost impossible to defend against, be more effective in driving home the point?