Pornstars and prostitutesFollow

As we weren'ty very busy at work this morning, and since we were done with laughing at gbaji's posts, we started debating whetehr there was any diffrence, on the whole, between being a prostitute and being a pornstar.

Both get paid to sell their body and get fUcked by random people. Some get filmed, others don't.

Is that it?

You decide!



I personally can't see any fundamental differences, but many people at work disagreed.

Yeah, though it seems in both world there is a "top of the pyramid" minority that "looks good" and makes lots of money, and a majority that looks like **** and does it to pay for crack.

I don't really get why pornstar are seen, by some, as "glamourous", and prostitutes are so reviled. It's the same thing.

The Camembert option tickled me like it should not have.
Lord, that stuff is awful.
I'll take a nice havarti any day.

On topic : Who cares as long as you don't have to pay for either ?

free **** is awesome.
free prostitutes are just whores/sluts with a fancy name.

Isn't that a paradox?

We're back to the free will/omniscience debate...

I'm liking you more and more!


Camembert, like blue vein cheese, makes me want to vomit.

But I really, truly, actually have a round of havarti on my desk right now, on a plate, with a small sharp knife. Havarti needs no other accompaniment. I have been slicing off a little, then slowly sucking it until it dissolves into cream on my tongue.


Edited, Oct 9th 2007 8:54am by Aripyanfar

I personally don't see **** stars as prostitutes because

A.)**** stars are not paying each other for sexual favors, a company is paying them on the books for "work" preformed.

B.)**** stars now a days anyway are held to high health standard by way of testing for diseases and STD's regularly.

C.)Since **** stars work for a company and they sell a product (I.E Movies, Magazines, Website subscriptions) there is no actual act of prostitution being committed.

D.)Most states require a permit in order to shoot a movie and or photographs of sexual acts, and most states and city's have a clause about where these activities can be preformed.

So basically the government says it's OK because they can regulate it, and they make money from the permits and taxes ect. That is the way I understand it at least.

So you're saying the difference is that one is legal and regulated, and the other isn't?

What about in the Netherlands then, where prostitution is legal, regulated, prostitutes are regularly checked for diseases, and where brothels are either registered companies, or prostitutes are classed as self-employed?

Yes that is basically what I am saying. And to me a "legal" prostitute is nothing more than a call girl. The word prostitute to me means dirty nasty crack ***** sluts that normally have more diseases then most small town hospitals. So to me there is a difference, some people may not see it that way but I do.

**** stars protected by 1st Ammendment....

....guess whores have nothing to say >.<

Maybe I should expand a little; by call girl I mean like a booty call where you give her some money for gas, not the sex type of thing. Meaning Prostitute to me means Illegal.

If she makes a career out of it, I guess not.

It's not prostitution if you're only getting paid for sex the one time?

A T-shirt versus cash obviously.


See? Genius, pure genius.