Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Mind boggling experience at McD'sFollow

#52 Oct 05 2007 at 3:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
Mr. Pikko just sent me a vid of the McDonald's strip case from two years ago, which I hadn't heard about before because I guess I live in a bubble and all, so I thought this thread was about that. Apparently today the girl won $6.1M from McDonalds.
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#53 Oct 05 2007 at 3:27 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Oh yeah, almost forgot about that.

http://www.allakhazam.com/forum.html?forum=4;mid=1129231601108494253;num=44


#54 Oct 05 2007 at 5:10 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
The Whopper is the BK answer to the Quarter Pounder. Both are a 1/4lb patty with about the same crap on them except that the Quarter Pounder has cheese as a default (unless you specifically ask otherwise, they'll assume "Quarter Pounder" means 'with cheese') and Burger King doesn't give you cheese unless you pony up an extra seventy cents or so for a slice of plasti-American singles. Point being, if the BK sandwich fills you up, it's gotta be in your head 'cause it's the same quantity of food. Or else you're being fed a crapload of discount shredded lettuce.

I can't speak for pricing over there but, around these parts, a Quarter Pounder w/ cheese is about fifty cents cheaper. A Big Mac is about twenty cents cheaper than a Quarter Pounder since it is less meat than than either the QP or Whopper.


Must be a weird regional thing then. A whopper costs less then a big mac around where I live (and is a lot bigger). A quarter pounder is about twice as much as a whopper. The McD's quarter pounder is much much smaller then the whopper as well, most notably because it has practically nothing inside it. It's a smushed flat bun, with a scraping of stuff and a shriveled patty. The whopper ends up being about twice the size (and fills me up much better). And the whopper tastes a heck of a lot better...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#55 Oct 05 2007 at 5:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Must be a weird regional thing then. A whopper costs less then a big mac around where I live (and is a lot bigger). A quarter pounder is about twice as much as a whopper. The McD's quarter pounder is much much smaller then the whopper as well, most notably because it has practically nothing inside it. It's a smushed flat bun, with a scraping of stuff and a shriveled patty. The whopper ends up being about twice the size (and fills me up much better). And the whopper tastes a heck of a lot better...
It's not a "Weird regional thing" -- you're just insane. The QP and the Whopper are the same burger with essentially the same ingredients (aside from the Whopper adding mayo for an extra 160 calories). Comparing the Whopper to the Big Mac is just silly since they aren't meant to compete. You might as well compare the Whopper to the Shamrock shake.

Hell, if you like the Whopper, go for it. Don't pretend it's anything different though. It ain't.

Again, can't speak for pricing except to say that I haven't been anywhere in the country where a QP wasn't about the same price, excepting airports and shopping malls. Maybe the Whopper sells for a buck out there in San Diego.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#56 Oct 05 2007 at 6:15 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
The QP and the Whopper are the same burger with essentially the same ingredients (aside from the Whopper adding mayo for an extra 160 calories). Comparing the Whopper to the Big Mac is just silly since they aren't meant to compete.


Er? The Whopper is 290g, the Quarter Pounder is 171g. That's weight Joph. The Whopper has much more "stuff" on it beyond just the meat. That's why it's a bigger (and better) burger. Yet oddly, the Quarter Pounder is priced noticeably higher.

What's really funny is that you insist that we don't compare the Big Mac, yet the Big Mac weighs in at 214g. It's *bigger* then the Quarter Pounder Joph.

The Quarter Pounder is pretty much the worst buy in terms of cost for food IMO. It's a disgusting thing that's just bun, meat, cheese, and a thinly spread bit of ketchup inside there somewhere. Put it side by side with a whopper sometime and you'll see what I'm talking about.


____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#57 Oct 05 2007 at 6:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Er? The Whopper is 290g, the Quarter Pounder is 171g. That's weight Joph. The Whopper has much more "stuff" on it beyond just the meat. That's why it's a bigger (and better) burger. Yet oddly, the Quarter Pounder is priced noticeably higher.
Not here, it's not. And the "stuff" is pretty much a slice or two of tomato and more bread that you're paying for. Yippee.
Quote:
What's really funny is that you insist that we don't compare the Big Mac, yet the Big Mac weighs in at 214g. It's *bigger* then the Quarter Pounder Joph.
Because it's all bread, dipshit Smiley: laugh Notice how the QP has 20% more calories from meat than the Big Mac? Try to figure out why that is.

The QP and the Whopper are the 1/4lb patty sandwiches for their chains. The Big Mac has two 1.6oz patties (1/5th lb combined). I don't know about you, but I consider the meat part of the burger to be more defining than how much bread they stuff into the wrapper.
Quote:
Put it side by side with a whopper sometime and you'll see what I'm talking about.
I've had both. I eat out daily for lunch. It's the same burger. Well, except that the Whopper has a significant upcharge for cheese. Which is pretty retarded.

Edit: It's late and I'm bored. According to this article, the average price of a Quarter Pounder w/ Cheese is $2.33. The average price for a Whopper is $2.24 (4% cheaper than a QP w/ Cheese). However, Burger King charges an extra fifty cents for cheese, bringing the price of a Whopper w/ cheese to $2.74 or 17% pricer than a QP w/ Cheese. Pretty much jives with my experience. The Whopper (with cheese) is over-priced for the same basic thing.

Edited, Oct 6th 2007 12:35am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#58 Oct 05 2007 at 10:23 PM Rating: Good
I'm going to have to agree with gbaji on this, there is no way that the whopper and the QP are the same size burger. The whopper patty has a much larger circumfrence and is actually thicker than the QP. At least, it is here in Winnipeg. Tastes much better as well imo.
#59 Oct 05 2007 at 10:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
According to Burger King's website, the Whopper is a 1/4lb patty. The Quarter Pounder is (not surprisingly) a 1/4lb patty. There's not much to argue about there.

Mind-numbingly annoying and Flash ridden cite. BK's website sucks.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#60 Oct 05 2007 at 11:40 PM Rating: Good
This has degenerated into perhaps my favorite Joph and gabji back-and-forth ever.

I say fUck em both. The burgers, that is. There was a Primetime or a Dateline or some other news magazine show a few years ago that tallied the health code violations for the top ten major fast food chains, and Burger King destroyed the competition, in a bad way. They were far ahead of the other chains in both the number and severity of violations.

I haven't eaten there since, and I used to fUcking love getting stoned and heading to Whopper Wednesdays. I loved it.

Of course, it's been even longer since I ate at Mickey-D's, because their food has been sh*t ever since I stopped wanting the toys out of Happy Meals. At least they're clean, though.

Subway was number three on the list of worst offenders, by the way, largely due to the fact that the ingredients sit out too long and become little bacteria traps. Nummers! I haven't eaten there in a few years, ever since there was one across the parking lot from my agency, and every time I did I got the worst sh*ts.

The cleanest of the ten largest restaurants? Taco Bell. That's right, Taco-MotherfUcking-Bell. I don't even know what's in a Crunchwrap Supreme, it could be people, for all I care, but it beats the hell out of the Whopper, a Big Mac, a Quarter Pounder, with or without cheese and that ****** Jared.

Edited, Oct 6th 2007 12:40am by Barkingturtle
#61 Oct 05 2007 at 11:41 PM Rating: Good
***
1,701 posts
While they may have the same size patty, the Whopper and the McRoyale are not the same burger. The difference comes in the dressing. A quarter pounder is basically just a big cheeseburger. None of the ingredients are different it's just a bigger patty and bun with the same hydrogenated onions, pickles and splash of condiments. With a Whopper you get actual vegetables: tomatoes, lettuce and onions. If you wanted to make a comparison between BK and Mickey D's you should compare the Whopper to the Big N' Tasty.
____________________________
If life gives you lemons, make lemonade. Then find someone that life has given vodka and have party.


This establishment does not serve women. You must bring your own.
#62 Oct 06 2007 at 2:30 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Jophiel wrote:
For as much as people ***** about McD's, I find it nummy enough on occassion. And Fillet o' Fish is still a Lent-time staple. I find that the worst burger price/value ratio comes from Burger King which is apparently of the opinion that a Whopper with cheese should be valued more highly than gold.


Around here, Burger King isn't that bad. Something like $5-6 for a Double Whopper combo. And their fries make it all worthwhile.

Whataburger around here is horrible though. $6.50+ for a single burger with cheese combo. Less than $5 without the cheese. Add bacon and you may have to mortgage your house. I've had a single value meal cost me $12.

Edited, Oct 6th 2007 4:37am by Poldaran
#63 Oct 06 2007 at 5:11 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
KingJohn wrote:
If you wanted to make a comparison between BK and Mickey D's you should compare the Whopper to the Big N' Tasty.
The only mentions of the Big N' Tasty's price I found (while it's off the dollar menu) places it cheaper than the QP w/ Cheese. But that might be because the BnT comes without cheese as well. Although it's cheaper to add cheese at McD's than at BK. Anyway, I went with the QP because it's the 4oz burger sales leader for McD's. And because gbaji made the bizarre statement that a Whopper was much larger and cheaper than a QP. Of course, I expect a proper burger to have cheese on it and it could be made of Kobe beef from a cow handfed by vestal virgins but if you're going to charge me half a buck for a slice of cheese, your burger skills still suck.
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Around here, Burger King isn't that bad. Something like $5-6 for a Double Whopper combo. And their fries make it all worthwhile.
Ironically, according to the PDF chart I linked to, every Whopper combo (without cheese) is more expensive than a QP meal w/ cheese. Despite the base Whopper being slightly cheaper.
Grandfather Barkingturtle wrote:
This has degenerated into perhaps my favorite Joph and gabji back-and-forth ever.
Mine too Smiley: laugh
BT wrote:
Burger King destroyed the competition, in a bad way. They were far ahead of the other chains in both the number and severity of violations.
I could believe that. I've been in some hellhole McD's but BKs are generally uniformally poor. The rare "clean" looking BK is the exception.
BT wrote:
I don't even know what's in a Crunchwrap Supreme, it could be people, for all I care, but it beats the hell out of the Whopper, a Big Mac, a Quarter Pounder, with or without cheese and that ****** Jared.
You are all poorer people for not having a Portillo's near by. Although a regular lunch date at Portillo's practically requires a second mortgage.

That's some damn good eating though.

Edited, Oct 6th 2007 8:33am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#64 Oct 06 2007 at 6:36 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Grandfather Barkingturtle wrote:
I don't even know what's in a Crunchwrap Supreme, it could be people, for all I care, but it beats the hell out of the Whopper, a Big Mac, a Quarter Pounder, with or without cheese and that ****** Jared.
What a pansy stomach you have. Quit blaming the restaurants, and work on your stomach skillz. Fuckin' first-worlders. Smiley: oyvey
#65 Oct 06 2007 at 6:38 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Yeah, eat more fish eyes, pansy!
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#66 Oct 06 2007 at 7:39 AM Rating: Decent
I work at Taco Bell (yes, we have very strict food cleanliness rules), and I'm printing out the OP for my coworkers to read. It should get a few laughs and "OMG"s.

I can tell you, if that McDonald's manager had been a manager at our Taco Bell, she would be out on her *** and Elderon would be enjoying some free tacos and burritos right now.
#67 Oct 06 2007 at 8:03 AM Rating: Good
Atomicflea wrote:
Grandfather Barkingturtle wrote:
I don't even know what's in a Crunchwrap Supreme, it could be people, for all I care, but it beats the hell out of the Whopper, a Big Mac, a Quarter Pounder, with or without cheese and that ****** Jared.
What a pansy stomach you have. Quit blaming the restaurants, and work on your stomach skillz. Fuckin' first-worlders. Smiley: oyvey


Psssh, you don't know me, holmes. I had a burrito in Tijuana once. It had green chile and finger nails.

I'm still standing.
#68 Oct 06 2007 at 8:37 AM Rating: Good
***
3,339 posts
Grandfather Barkingturtle wrote:

Psssh, you don't know me, holmes. I had a burrito in Tijuana once. It had green chile and finger nails.

I'm still standing.


Feh, if you weren't such a pasny it would have had the fingers, too!
#69 Oct 06 2007 at 8:39 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
FFATMA wrote:
I'm going to have to agree with gbaji on this, there is no way that the whopper and the QP are the same size burger. The whopper patty has a much larger circumfrence and is actually thicker than the QP. At least, it is here in Winnipeg. Tastes much better as well imo.

The main reason for the size and appearance differential is the method of cooking. McConald's meat is cooked in a clamshell, which means squashing it flat and squeezing a lot of the juice out. Burger King meat is, of course, flame-broiled, which may make it a bit more appealing but does cause for a lot more kitchen fires at the hands of 16 year olds.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#70 Oct 06 2007 at 12:55 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Zieveraar wrote:
Quote:
It's never to early to teach your kids what real food tastes like anyway. I've honestly never understood what the deal is with their food. Do they put some special kid-crack in it or something?


Yeah, sugar. Lots of it. Very few kids will turn down anything that has sufficient amount of sugar in it.

I even know people who add sugar to cooked carrots, totally disgusting imo.




Not if you're 5 and hate regular cooked carrots....


I hated french fries at that age to be honest. And knowing my mother, she'ld just serve me those carrots again the next day if I hadn't eaten them the first time round, no sugar added whatsoever.

Luckily, she was a bit more merciful with those fries, cold fries aren't really appetising.

#71 Oct 06 2007 at 1:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Zieveraar wrote:
Luckily, she was a bit more merciful with those fries, cold fries aren't really appetising.


While I haven't been to McDonalds in at least a year, Burger King, slightly less, I will admit that McD's fries, cold, are a life changing experience. Solidified oil and potato starch. Delicious in a way that can't be defined.
#72 Oct 06 2007 at 2:11 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Zieveraar wrote:
Luckily, she was a bit more merciful with those fries, cold fries aren't really appetising.


While I haven't been to McDonalds in at least a year, Burger King, slightly less, I will admit that McD's fries, cold, are a life changing experience. Solidified oil and potato starch. Delicious in a way that can't be defined.


I'ld try it out but unfortunately after messing up my order for about the third time this year, I'm not going back there myself. (ironically, they forgot to add the fries, again, as it's drive-thru and about 10 minutes later, I just couldn't be bothered to head back, again)

I'll just have to take your word for it Smiley: grin
#73 Oct 06 2007 at 2:46 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
18,463 posts
Grandfather Barkingturtle wrote:
Psssh, you don't know me, holmes. I had a burrito in Tijuana once.
A burrito? Well, laDEE-FREAKING-da, Robby Knievel! I'll have to pen tales of your derring do to sing to me grandbabies!!!

Puss. Try a green salad and tapwater in Tijuana and then get back to me.
#74 Oct 06 2007 at 4:08 PM Rating: Decent
I printed the OP and gave it to the GM at my Taco Bell. She and the others who read it were speechless. She asked me if she could keep the printout so she could make copies to hand out at the Taco Bell office. Smiley: lol
#75 Oct 06 2007 at 4:14 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
[/quote]

Luckily, she was a bit more merciful with those fries, cold fries aren't really appetising.



Think yourself lucky.Fries are always cold from my local donalds.
#76 Oct 06 2007 at 4:15 PM Rating: Good
*
216 posts
What did you really expect from someone being paid $7 an hour to work one of the crummiest jobs known to man?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 254 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (254)