The Elinda of Doom wrote:
gbaji wrote:
I'mk curious about the poll question. Are we talking about the US economy in general? Or just "the budget"? As in "this years budget"? The one in which the Dems have done everything they could to make up for spending cuts over the last decade or so?
Just the budget. I heard a news story this am and the person being interviewed (don't ask me who) referred to the budget as a 'crisis'...and emphasised the point by repeating the word at least once(dam left wing media!). So I was wondering if others thought it was in crisis mode, just a bit troubling, or 'ok'.
The story was all the way this morning, so my brief recount would be far from accurate, but he brought up the amount of our debt that's now being held by foriegn countries, the social security outlook (grim or merely spooked??), and some other stuff.
/shrug
Without knowing what exactly he thought the "budget" should be instead of what it is, I'm still not sure what he was talking about. A budget (in this context anyway) is a single set of things that the US government spends money on each year. I'm not sure how a budget is "in crisis", unless he's talking about fights over how much money should be spent and why (as in: we're having trouble passing a budget cause no one can agree on it).
Oddly, all the stuff he mentioned really refer to the economy in general, which I don't believe is "in crisis" at all. Unless he's trying to argue that the budget needs to be a certain way in order to deal with the economic conditions he's talking about. Which can still be read a couple different ways of course. A Liberal will say that we need to spend more money (and tax more to pay for it) so as to provide for benefits that we aren't currently providing and pay for it without increasing debt. A Conservative will argue that we should reduce the budget (or at least decrease the amount of increase if that makes sense) so as to reduce the amount we spend and therefore reduce the amount of debt.
Both sides can and will point to various economic indicators to support their point of course, so without knowing what exactly he was proposing we do, I'm not sure what to think of his statement or his claim.