Samira wrote:
Quote:
How the f'uck can people defend Michael Vicks?
I know! I couldn't believe Whoopi Goldberg asserting that dog fighting is part of southern culture. Honey, I grew up in the south and I never heard of anyone using dogs for sport fighting.
Part of his culture, my ***.
I used to live right next to a really rough neighborhood. It was L.A. - thus every part is within blocks of grandiose luxury and within blocks of the hood. Anyhow, I walk my great dane everywhere, and I pretty much strike up conversations with everyone.
And they fight dogs. It would come up in about half the conversations with guys. "Nice dog. Do you fight her?", "I had a really nice dog, too, but my cousin took her and fought her and now she's really messed up".
If you'd asked me before I lived there: do people in your neighborhood fight dogs? I would have said no, of course not. It seems totally antiquated to me. It's like asking if they revulcanize their tires.
But it is alive and well. And people talk far more openly about it then, say, drugs. It would take a few conversations with the same person before the subtle drug hints would crop up. Dog fighting? It was often one of the first things they asked about.
I suppose this is an effect of the enforcement emphasis on drugs, and virtually none on dog fighting. But it was shocking, to me, to see people talk so openly about something so vile.
I really, really hope that the Mike Vick story sheds some light on animal fighting and gets people thinking they could be caught next. And maybe leads to a bit more enforcement. God knows I'd rather lock up people who fight dogs over people who use drugs.