Jophiel wrote:
There's probably a dozen other books on the same topic on the shelf at Barnes & Noble with pretty much the same info.
Maybe, but then again, there might be something in there which seemed irrelvant at the time, but which will be of great importance to future historians. The chances aren't high, granted, but you never know.
I think there's two different topics in this subject, though. One is about the content of the book, and the other the books themselves. I think the content is extremely important, and should be kept. Especially today, it can all be stored electronically, and would not take any physical space. It can only be beneficial to keep it somewhere for future use.
Once that is done, the book itself, in its physical form, doesn't necessarily matter that much. Objectively, there is nothing special about mass-produced books with paper which will automatically disolve after 50 years or so anyway. I wouldn't feel bad about throwing away some crappy novel I bought at the train station, but I would never even dream of spilling a drop of water on my
Pléiade collection.