Sopio wrote:
3rd option as well
Quote:
I finished it today. Thought it was the ultra mega happy ending. Was a bit surprised they killed off both Tonks and Lupin with their child being just born.
I felt the same at first, until I remembered that Harry is now Ted's uncle, kind of a repeat between Harry and Sirius.
That's what I thought she was going for with that.
The whole book seems to deal with the idea of death and loss, and nearly everyone in the book who doesn't experience it in some way or fashion. Harry loses his owl, the Weasleys lose one of the twins, Hermoine has to make her parents forget about her (and she doesn't know if she will ever be able to talk to them again), etc.
What I really found interesting in this book was the fact that despite Dumbledore not really appearing much in it (only what, some of the last 10 pages or so?), his presence pervails the whole book. It reminds me of how Dracula only appeared in fifty-ish pages of Stroker's
Dracula novel, but you can feel his influence upon each page. The fact that Dumbledore was a flawed character did more to bring him to life than anything in the previous six books.
One thing I really wish was that it showed more how the Weasley twin felt about his brother dying, and what he was doing in the Epilogue.
In my opinion...honestly, this book had to end happily nineteen years later. Anything else and I would have felt disappointed.
The Sapranos and the
Seinfield endings were unambigious and left things incomplete (it felt like it at least).