Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

If you live in America, learn to speak english.Follow

#27 Jul 17 2007 at 8:07 AM Rating: Decent
Singdall wrote:
do they not speak english? if not, then they should not of been hired by your union in the first place.


Why not? It's their company; they'll hire who they want.
#28 Jul 17 2007 at 9:04 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
What difference does their language make?


simple if you can not communicate you can not perform 100% it is that simple. even at a labor job, you still have to communicate with someone and you still have to be able to read plans for said project you are working on.

does not matter if it is electrical, plumbing, carpentry, etc... in order to do the job 100% you have to have proper communication skills.
#29 Jul 17 2007 at 9:07 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
*Shrug*

That's why the foremen are bilingual.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#30 Jul 17 2007 at 9:13 AM Rating: Decent
so they do have to communicate with someone. still would be much better for the union to of not highered them in the first place. cuts down on the cost of the foreman as the foreman then no longer has to be bilingual thus reducing the amount of pay he costs the company.
#31 Jul 17 2007 at 9:24 AM Rating: Good
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Singdall wrote:
so they do have to communicate with someone. still would be much better for the union to of not highered them in the first place. cuts down on the cost of the foreman as the foreman then no longer has to be bilingual thus reducing the amount of pay he costs the company.
It's a work crew. Of course they communicate with a supervisor. They'd have a foreman regardless and you're assuming that being bilingual is adding a large premium. It's not -- the scale is the same regardless of what you speak and a pure English speaker would be making the same rate. The ones making over scale are the ones busting their *** and doing a good job, not because they're any more bilingual than the foremen making scale.

Also, not to state the obvious, but the union isn't hiring anyone. The company is hiring people who are (or become) union members.

Look, I know you're upset that your "You'll never make over minimum without English" canard was disproven but you can stop making wild guesses about a union and business you know jack-shit about.

Edited, Jul 17th 2007 12:25pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#32 Jul 17 2007 at 9:36 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

For example: I am in Japan on business, and have a non-fluent but advanced grasp of japanese. I would attempt to communicate with my japanese-speaking companions in Japanese at every opportunity.


They'd smile and see this as about as polite as pissing on their legs at dinner.

Mindbogglingly horrible example.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#33 Jul 17 2007 at 9:38 AM Rating: Decent
Singdall wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
What difference does their language make?


simple if you can not communicate you can not perform 100% it is that simple./quote]


You speak English and you can't communicate for sh*t either, so why are you busting a hump over someone else's company?

Edited, Jul 17th 2007 12:39pm by Kaelesh
#34 Jul 17 2007 at 9:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
endingforever wrote:
But I fail to see why this sparked multiple flames/rate-downs. Of course the anonymity [sp] of the internet contributed slightly but it would be much appreciated if any of you could explain what you meant when you disagreed with my view, particularly the ones who did so in a rude manner. I have no want of a flame war so if that is the only response you have to this post, I am afraid I will not respond to you and I bid you adeiu.


Who flamed you?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#35 Jul 17 2007 at 10:45 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
19,369 posts
Samira wrote:
endingforever wrote:
But I fail to see why this sparked multiple flames/rate-downs. Of course the anonymity [sp] of the internet contributed slightly but it would be much appreciated if any of you could explain what you meant when you disagreed with my view, particularly the ones who did so in a rude manner. I have no want of a flame war so if that is the only response you have to this post, I am afraid I will not respond to you and I bid you adeiu.


Who flamed you?


Miss Scarlet in the study with the candle stick.
#36 Jul 17 2007 at 11:05 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
Samira wrote:
endingforever wrote:
But I fail to see why this sparked multiple flames/rate-downs. Of course the anonymity [sp] of the internet contributed slightly but it would be much appreciated if any of you could explain what you meant when you disagreed with my view, particularly the ones who did so in a rude manner. I have no want of a flame war so if that is the only response you have to this post, I am afraid I will not respond to you and I bid you adeiu.


Who flamed you?


Miss Sabo in the study with the candle stick.



Would have been funnier...
#37 Jul 17 2007 at 11:43 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I really don't give a rat's *** when they speak in Spanish because I'm not worried that they're hiding things from me.

Obviously, that will change once we're married
Just tidied that up a bit for you there Jophy
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#38 Jul 17 2007 at 11:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Shit, by that time we'll both be on the hook anyway. Too late for secrets! Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#39 Jul 17 2007 at 2:11 PM Rating: Excellent
***
3,339 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

For example: I am in Japan on business, and have a non-fluent but advanced grasp of japanese. I would attempt to communicate with my japanese-speaking companions in Japanese at every opportunity.


They'd smile and see this as about as polite as pissing on their legs at dinner.



So, hold on, I've seen their **** - are you saying it would be impolite or a turn on?

#40 Jul 17 2007 at 2:27 PM Rating: Decent
*
142 posts
I have no problem with other that are unable to speak english if they come to this country. If they feel more comfortable speaking their native tongue, then that is their choice. As said it would be nice if they knew some english to help them get started.

But I do have a problem with the schools trying to make us learn a different language. I think that should be a choice, not a requirement. I think my friend said they are now making them learn Spanish, well least from my understanding they have to take it 1 year. I could of misunderstood him, if so then that is my fault, but I am pretty sure that I understood him right.

#41 Jul 17 2007 at 2:36 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
DecendentMonk wrote:
I think my friend said they are now making them learn Spanish, well least from my understanding they have to take it 1 year. I could of misunderstood him, if so then that is my fault, but I am pretty sure that I understood him right.

Yeah I'd stick with trying a basic grasp of English before tackling anything else.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#42 Jul 17 2007 at 3:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
We had to take a year of a foreign language in high school, too. It's not that onerous.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#43 Jul 17 2007 at 3:49 PM Rating: Decent
**
573 posts
I don't really have a problem with people having conversations in spanish or something around me. It only starts to bother me if they switch in and out of english mid sentence. Then I catch the english part and gibberish to me and it kind of drives me nuts.
#44 Jul 17 2007 at 7:02 PM Rating: Decent
DecendentMonk wrote:
But I do have a problem with the schools trying to make us learn a different language. I think that should be a choice, not a requirement. I think my friend said they are now making them learn Spanish, well least from my understanding they have to take it 1 year. I could of misunderstood him, if so then that is my fault, but I am pretty sure that I understood him right.



Secondary language should be mandatory because, collectively, this country is dumb as ****. If only I had paid more attention in Middle School, I wouldn't be having such a hard time learning my soon to be's native tongue at this age.
#45 Jul 17 2007 at 8:45 PM Rating: Good
*****
19,369 posts
DecendentMonk wrote:
I have no problem with other that are unable to speak english if they come to this country. If they feel more comfortable speaking their native tongue, then that is their choice. As said it would be nice if they knew some english to help them get started.

But I do have a problem with the schools trying to make us learn a different language. I think that should be a choice, not a requirement. I think my friend said they are now making them learn Spanish, well least from my understanding they have to take it 1 year. I could of misunderstood him, if so then that is my fault, but I am pretty sure that I understood him right.



You're kidding yourself if you think you'll learn a secondary language with one year in a public school.

Here I'll sum up an entire year of high school spanish for you;

rojo
azul
blanco
verde
uno
dos
tres
quatro
cinco
el gato
el perro
el taco
me gusta tacos
el taco de perro
donde esta la biblioteca
como estas
adios
bien
malo
buenos tardes
buenos noches
asta la vista, baby







#46 Jul 17 2007 at 9:35 PM Rating: Decent
*
142 posts
I never said I would learn Spanish in a entire year, actually I never took it. The mandatory 1 year rule went into effect after I was out of high school. I graduated 8 years ago.

I honestly don't know what they teach in a year for Spanish. I do know that my friend that took it, he actually learned quite a bit. But every school teaches at their own pace or they teach other languages as well. Our only taught Spanish as the alternative.

I personally would like to learn Japanese, but I don't know how hard that is to learn. I would be willing to try though, just in case I ever decide to travel there one day.

Edited, Jul 18th 2007 12:37am by DecendentMonk
#47 Jul 17 2007 at 9:55 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
endingforever wrote:
I don't quite understand what you're trying to point out to me.


That is because you are a stunned c'unt.


The colesnotes version of why you are in fact a stunned c'unt can be found at the following link.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#48 Jul 18 2007 at 6:19 AM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:
Singdall wrote:
so they do have to communicate with someone. still would be much better for the union to of not highered them in the first place. cuts down on the cost of the foreman as the foreman then no longer has to be bilingual thus reducing the amount of pay he costs the company.
It's a work crew. Of course they communicate with a supervisor. They'd have a foreman regardless and you're assuming that being bilingual is adding a large premium. It's not -- the scale is the same regardless of what you speak and a pure English speaker would be making the same rate. The ones making over scale are the ones busting their *** and doing a good job, not because they're any more bilingual than the foremen making scale.

Also, not to state the obvious, but the union isn't hiring anyone. The company is hiring people who are (or become) union members.

Look, I know you're upset that your "You'll never make over minimum without English" canard was disproven but you can stop making wild guesses about a union and business you know jack-shit about.

Edited, Jul 17th 2007 12:25pm by Jophiel


hmm lets cover some basics of business here.

1. in union restricted areas in order to get some jobs you MUST be a union member.
2. having multi-languages makes you more desirable to employees who have to work in parts of the US were a higher percentage of the labor force does not speak english clearly.
3. union members can not be fired easily.

so lets recap shall we.

1. the union allowed those who can not speak clear english to join.
2. this means a company that is required to higher union members will/can blindly higher them, but then can not fire them easily.
3. union members basically can not be fired unless they do not show up for work, or do the work so horrid that they are written up for it multiple times, or a few other extreeme reasons to fire someone. they can not be fired for not doing their job at a fast pace, in fact they can leave the job unfinished as long as they were "working" during their union hours.
4. bilingual employees in some areas will have an easier time getting a job, thus making it more difficult for someone who ONLY speaks english as their native language to get a job, thus taking MONEY out of their pocket. even though that english only speaking person is just as qualified if not MORE so it does not matter.


so with those things stated clearly. a company that highers union workers who can not, do not speak english is taking money out of the community by being forced to higher other employees who speak more then 1 language. also as a result of being a union labor force the company does not have to pay the bilingual employee any more even though he/she/it has more "training" in communication. this means unless all of the rest of the employable people in the area learn a 2nd or 3rd or more languages they will not be desirable for higher paying positions in the company that highers union workers who can not communicate properly.

this is one of the many reasons i HATE unions. they served their purpose decades ago, but in the US they are now more of a burden on the economy then they are a boon to the employee. your statements are a perfect example of my feelings.

i will state again. if you can not communicate 100% you can not do your job 100%. to have a translator is not the same as communicating your self.

and yes i know a lot about unions and i do not have to know the exact business you are in to know about them.
#49 Jul 18 2007 at 6:34 AM Rating: Decent
Can you show me the law that says you have to speak fluent english to get a job in America, *********



You're as bad as the jefferson parish council trying to take away my taco trucks. **** off and let me have my food in peace you ********
#50 Jul 18 2007 at 6:52 AM Rating: Decent
Singdall wrote:
and yes i know a lot about unions and i do not have to know the exact business you are in to know about them.


You break boards for a living, what the fuck do you think you know about anything? Face facts Sing, you live in Florida, surrounded by all those horrible brown people, so just admit your a racist prick and be done with it.

I can almost see you now, jumping up and down, ******* about them dirty brownies, dressed up in your American Flag Gi, taken your jobs, sucking up your taxes, all because they speak Spanish.
#51 Jul 18 2007 at 7:11 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,261 posts
There was a funny email recently sent out in our office that said "How all phone calls in america SHOULD be answered"

Quote:
Thank you for calling 'insert business here'.
For English, press 1.
For all others languages, press 2 to disconnect.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 318 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (318)