Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Archivists for freedom!Follow

#1 Jun 25 2007 at 5:35 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
I've only been following this story for a coupla days but it does appear to be a doozy.

Its all a bit complicated, but as far as I can make out, it goes a bit like this.....

There is a Executive Order that requires 'all agencies of the executive branch' of the administaration to make availiable data concerning the amount of classified and de-classified documents to the Information Security Oversight Office – a small part of the National Archives whose job it is to monitor the government-wide security classification system.

Cheneys' office stopped providing the info after 2002.

Cheney's office says they exempt from the executive order, since it has both executive branch and legislative functions.


On June 22, White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino said the executive order didn't intend Cheney's office to be treated as an administration agency.

"He's not exempt from following the laws of the United States," said Ms. Perino. "He's exempt just from this reporting requirement in this particular executive order."

Alberto Gonzales has been asked to rule on the matter (last January) and has yet to do so.

Apparently ,Cheney, in response to this controversy, has suggested that the Information Security Office be abolished.

So. Is the VP part of the Executive branch of the Government, or is he a sort of autonomous off-world DarkStar entity that operates outside the laws of the nation?

After all this is a guy that took half a day to inform anyone that he had shot his mate in the face. A man who thinks torture is ok. A man whose title is VICE president, but doesn't appear to have a 'boss'.

It would be odd, that in the midst of all the death and slaughter wrought by these people that the 'nail in the coffin' that finally exposes their deceit would be banged in by some bespectacled archivists.

I live in hope.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#2 Jun 25 2007 at 5:37 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
I have nothing to say about this.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#3 Jun 25 2007 at 5:51 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
paulsol the Righteous wrote:

It would be odd, that in the midst of all the death and slaughter wrought by these people that the 'nail in the coffin' that finally exposes their deceit would be banged in by some bespectacled archivists.

I live in hope.


You haven't been paying attention I see. No one politicaly neutral and with the legal power and will power to do anything has stepped up yet. What makes you think it will happen now, in the 9th inning? Clinton got a BJ, said "No I didn't" and he nearly got impeached. Bush and Co. pisses on the Constitution everyday and we get a "meh".
#4 Jun 25 2007 at 6:30 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
paulsol the Righteous wrote:
There is a Executive Order that requires 'all agencies of the executive branch' of the administaration to make availiable data concerning the amount of classified and de-classified documents to the Information Security Oversight Office – a small part of the National Archives whose job it is to monitor the government-wide security classification system.


This hinges on what was intended by "all agencies". I would assume that means various departments under the various cabinet positions which deal with classfied materials. So like the FBI, CIA, NSA, DoD, etc...

Without you perhaps having some source of information other then hearsay, it's pretty much impossible to know for sure, but at a guess I'd say that an individuals office within the whitehouse itself is not necessarily considered an "agency".

Quote:
Cheneys' office stopped providing the info after 2002.


Again. Source on this information? Was he doing it before? To whom? Was this done in a vacuum? Or perhaps had something to do with the reshaping of how intelligence and classified materials are handled as a result of the formation of the Homeland Security Department. It's not like the VPs office is actually empowered to do anything directly. They may interact with other agencies, but then those documents would appear and be reported because the other agencies were involved.

It's not like the VP has his own super secret squad of Jack Bauer clones doing his evil bidding. Ok. Not that you or I know of anyway... ;)

Quote:
Cheney's office says they exempt from the executive order, since it has both executive branch and legislative functions.


Well. He is the President of the Senate. He holds the tie breaker vote. Thus, he (and his office) would be involved in legistlative matters as part of the normal day to day job. In fact, that's really one of the major duties of the VPs office. To act as a direct link between the President and Congress. It would not surprise me if a significant majority of paper that passes through that office is legistlative in nature, not executive.


Quote:
On June 22, White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino said the executive order didn't intend Cheney's office to be treated as an administration agency.


Ok. Do you have any reason to believe that this is false? Again. It would help terrifically if you actually knew something concrete about the executive order rather then just hearsay.


Quote:
Alberto Gonzales has been asked to rule on the matter (last January) and has yet to do so.


Asked by whom? You make this sound like it's some ominous thing and there's some kind of conspiracy going on. If it's not illegal, then what is there to "rule on" (he's not a judge though, so this is a poor choice of words)? What was Gonzales supposed to do? Have a complete investigation into something that's not illegal so that he can hold a press conference declaring it to not be illegal just so he can satisfy some nutjob leftwinger's strage fantasies about how the law should work?

Quote:
Apparently ,Cheney, in response to this controversy, has suggested that the Information Security Office be abolished.


Apparently? Um... Can we be a bit more definative then this? At this point, you're just rummormongering. And doing it poorly at that. I can make up stories about horrible things that someone in government might be doing right now too...

Quote:
So. Is the VP part of the Executive branch of the Government, or is he a sort of autonomous off-world DarkStar entity that operates outside the laws of the nation?


False dilema. First off, as I pointed out, the VP *is* technically a member of the Senate, and certainly does deal with legistlative issues (has to). It's one of the few (perhaps *only*) Constituationally mandated duties the VP has (except to take over as President in case of incapacitation).

Secondly, since you haven't established what was meant by "agencies", you can't say that the VPs office is in anyway covered under that executive order. Thus, your wonderfully contrived "or else he's doing something evil!!!!" argument is both silly and irrelevant.

You might want to start with the executive order. Then see how the order is applied. Then figure out whether the VPs office is covered. And then you might just want to ask the president how he feels about it. See. It's an "executive order". Not a law. The president is not bound by it. Can't be. He can pick and choose how it's applied to. It's his order, by his authority. The only one who can demand that someone comply is the president. I'm reasonably certain that if he wanted or intended for Cheney's office to comply with that order, Cheney's office would be complying.


Or do you not really understand what an Executive Order is?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#5 Jun 25 2007 at 7:08 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Gbaji sai

Quote:
This hinges on what was intended by "all agencies". I would assume that means various departments under the various cabinet positions which deal with classfied materials. So like the FBI, CIA, NSA, DoD, etc...

Without you perhaps having some source of information other then hearsay, it's pretty much impossible to know for sure, but at a guess I'd say that an individuals office within the whitehouse itself is not necessarily considered an "agency".


In amongst the wording of the EO is this passage.
Quote:

"prescribes a uniform system for classifying, safeguarding, and declassifying national security information ... ."
My bold. Link

I would assume that 'uniform' means the 'same for everyone'. Not 'the same for everyone except the VP'.

These passages are what drew my attn to it.

Quote:
– Since 2003, Cheney’s office has failed to provide data on its classification and declassification activities as required by Executive Order 12958, which President Bush has amended and endorsed.


Quote:
– In 2004, Cheney’s office specifically intervened to block an on-site inspection by the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), which is a requirement of the executive order.


Heres where I first heard about it.

I'm sure its all above board and honest. But ya know, what with Cheneys secretive nature, his dealings with the Halliburton/war cash cow thing, and his love of torturing prisoners....well I for one would love to see his downfall bought about by a dept. full of librarians.

But yeah, you're right, I'm just rumour-mongering with the rest of it. Smiley: dubious

____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#6 Jun 25 2007 at 7:44 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Ah. Now I know what this is about.

You do know this has nothing to do with some kind of "freedom of information", right? It has everything to do with abusing power, but not in the way you think.

Chairman Waxman has been trying to dig up dirt on Republicans, specifically the White house since he gained the power to do so in the last elections. His tactic is similar to that used against Libby during the Plame deal. Throw a wall of motions, appeals, and subpeonas at the White House. Get as many people to make statements "on the record" as possible, then dig through the archives for any fact or statement that does not match. Then try to charge them with a crime.


It's a fishing expedition. Again. This is the same guy who attempted to get Rice to show up and give him statements under oath about her knowledge of Iraq's WMD programs from back when she was National Security Advisor. His entire deal is trying to dig up old stuff from two different directions to see if he can create the appearance of inconsistency. He's a monumental waste of time.


In this particular case, he's trying to keep the Plame investigation alive. Not good enough to get one person totally unrelated to the leak, so he's going to see if he can keep throwing stuff out there and hope something shakes loose. Never mind that we already know who leaked her identity. Never mind that Fitzerald has closed that investigation. Never mind that the only result of the investigation was the indictment and conviction of someone who wasn't involved in the leak in any way. Because what he's doing has nothing to do with justice. It has nothing to do with whether or not Cheney's office has correctly handled classified documents. It has everything with trying to catch someone in a lie (or something that can be made to appear like a lie). He figures if he can examine enough documents, he'll find something to use.


And, even if he fails, he can always use the mere fact that he's trying to make some people believe there must be something there. Where there's smoke there's fire, right? If there wasn't something suspicious going on at the White House, Waxman wouldn't be insisting on those documents, right? Think about it...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#7 Jun 25 2007 at 8:32 PM Rating: Decent
Waxman may have ulterior motives, but no matter the motives it does seem odd that Cheney can claim executive priviledge for some things but claim he's not part of the executive branch on others. BUT, this story when I've seen it has been rather poorly covered and explained.

Is Cheney claiming exemption for ALL of his records, or just the ones related to his legislative duties? I'd think the proper decision would be to exempt him from the legislative stuff, but not from the executive stuff. For stuff that's both, no exemption.

No matter who's right or wrong here, Cheney remains a stupid piece of ****.
#8 Jun 26 2007 at 7:02 AM Rating: Decent
paulsol the Righteous wrote:
I've only been following this story for a coupla days but it does appear to be a doozy.

Its all a bit complicated, but as far as I can make out, it goes a bit like this.....

There is a Executive Order that requires 'all agencies of the executive branch' of the administaration to make availiable data concerning the amount of classified and de-classified documents to the Information Security Oversight Office – a small part of the National Archives whose job it is to monitor the government-wide security classification system.

Cheneys' office stopped providing the info after 2002.

Cheney's office says they exempt from the executive order, since it has both executive branch and legislative functions.


On June 22, White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino said the executive order didn't intend Cheney's office to be treated as an administration agency.

"He's not exempt from following the laws of the United States," said Ms. Perino. "He's exempt just from this reporting requirement in this particular executive order."

Alberto Gonzales has been asked to rule on the matter (last January) and has yet to do so.

Apparently ,Cheney, in response to this controversy, has suggested that the Information Security Office be abolished.

So. Is the VP part of the Executive branch of the Government, or is he a sort of autonomous off-world DarkStar entity that operates outside the laws of the nation?

After all this is a guy that took half a day to inform anyone that he had shot his mate in the face. A man who thinks torture is ok. A man whose title is VICE president, but doesn't appear to have a 'boss'.

It would be odd, that in the midst of all the death and slaughter wrought by these people that the 'nail in the coffin' that finally exposes their deceit would be banged in by some bespectacled archivists.

I live in hope.


Don't you live in some worthless ****** little country no one cares about anyway? Why the **** do you care,and why the **** should I care that you care?


I live in hope too, that the Army grabs your *** and tosses you into gitmo. Shut the **** up.
#9 Jun 26 2007 at 7:13 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
gbaji wrote:
This hinges on what was intended by "all agencies". I would assume that means various departments under the various cabinet positions which deal with classfied materials. So like the FBI, CIA, NSA, DoD, etc...

Without you perhaps having some source of information other then hearsay, it's pretty much impossible to know for sure, but at a guess I'd say that an individuals office within the whitehouse itself is not necessarily considered an "agency".

OMG, gbaji, is this kind of semantical bs just to fill up the page?

Git wrote:
Clinton got a BJ, said "No I didn't" and he nearly got impeached. Bush and Co. pisses on the Constitution everyday and we get a "meh".


Clearly **** needs a ********.

I bet he had one once and then never was able to get another, so now he's all like...how he is.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#10 Jun 26 2007 at 7:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Ah. Now I know what this is about.

You do know this has nothing to do with some kind of "freedom of information", right? It has everything to do with abusing power, but not in the way you think.
Without reading, allow me to sum up the rest of this post...

Liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy, liberal conspiracy... truely, this is a new low point for the Dems and why they are so dangerous. Think about it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Jun 26 2007 at 7:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I could have sworn I'd posted on this before.

Cheney's reasoning for refusing to comply with the executive (yes, as in Presidential order) is that the VP isn't under control of the Executive branch, but is President of the Senate and therefore an Executive-Legislative hybrid.

We now have four branches of government, it seems. The Executive branch is run from the White House. The Legislative branch is run from the House and the Senate. The Judicial branch is run from the Supreme Court; and the Cheney branch is run from an Undisclosed Location.

My favorite part is where he tried to get the National Archive disbanded after they had the temerity to insist that he follow the law.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#12 Jun 26 2007 at 7:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Samira wrote:
Cheney's reasoning for refusing to comply with the executive (yes, as in Presidential order) is that the VP isn't under control of the Executive branch, but is President of the Senate and therefore an Executive-Legislative hybrid.
So he wears heavy plate and gets a gimpy skeleton pet.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#13 Jun 26 2007 at 7:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
Cheney's reasoning for refusing to comply with the executive (yes, as in Presidential order) is that the VP isn't under control of the Executive branch, but is President of the Senate and therefore an Executive-Legislative hybrid.
So he wears heavy plate and gets a gimpy skeleton pet.


Thought Tony Snow was the gimpy skeleton pet?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#14 Jun 26 2007 at 9:50 AM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Could be worse. He could get to wear plate and get some heals and stuns instead of that gimpy pet...


And Joph? You can cry "OMG! gbaji's talkin Liberal Conspiracy again!!!" all day long. Doesn't change the fact that since being appointed chairman of oversight, Waxman has basically spent all his time on some weird kind of personal vendetta against the White House. It seems as though his "job" really is to dig up any documents or statements by any administration officials that can be used as a political weapon. His tactic of preference seems to be the "get them from two sources" approach. Find a document that says one thing, and a sworn statement that says something that looks different. Present this as some kind of oddity that should be investigated...


Just more of the same IMO.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#15 Jun 26 2007 at 9:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
And Joph? You can cry "OMG! gbaji's talkin Liberal Conspiracy again!!!" all day long.
Thanks, I will. I have no idea what you wrote in that post because, in all honesty and sincerity, I didn't read past the quoted portion as I didn't see the need to slog through a half dozen paragraphs of poorly reasoned conjecture and factual errors to arrive at the same conclusion that I wrote.

You've turned into a one-trick pony and it's not even a trick you're particularly skilled at.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#16 Jun 26 2007 at 11:00 AM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Samira wrote:
Cheney's reasoning for refusing to comply with the executive (yes, as in Presidential order) is that the VP isn't under control of the Executive branch, but is President of the Senate and therefore an Executive-Legislative hybrid.
So he wears heavy plate and gets a gimpy skeleton pet.


So he's a ShadowKnight? Seems appropriate.
#17 Jun 26 2007 at 11:27 AM Rating: Decent
Daily Shows take on it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqDo9AupnlM
#18 Jun 26 2007 at 1:20 PM Rating: Default
par for the coarse for this addministraition.

not supprised, no comment. just waiting for their time in office to tick away.
#19 Jun 26 2007 at 1:45 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
shadowrelm wrote:
no comment


God, I wish, nevermind that you made two in that drivel you call a post.
#20 Jun 26 2007 at 3:58 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
gbaji said

Quote:
Ah. Now I know what this is about.



Obviously you have no idea what its about....

The real issue in this story is not the efforts of Waxman, or the withholding of information that is legally required to be passed on to the relevant departments.

No. the real issue here is that D1ck Cheney, the VP of the USA, said in no uncertain terms that the office of The vice president of the United States is not actually part of the executive branch of the federal government, and is therefore not required to give any papers to anyone, ever.

Tho he is covered by executive privilege, and he is a member of the presidential cabinet, yet somehow his office is not part of the executive branch.


The fact that his position as VP. is there at all is in case for some reason Bush is unable to continue his duties as El Presidente, then he is there to step in and take over the reins. If he feels that that isn't what he's there for, he should go home and retire.

For you to get all tied in a knot about Waxman and Plame and Bob knows what, shows that you havnt for a moment, thought about the implications of Cheneys reaction.

As Joph said, you seem to be losin' it ....


And abbadd added
Quote:
Don't you live in some worthless sh*tty little country no one cares about anyway? Why the @#%^ do you care,and why the @#%^ should I care that you care?


I live in hope too, that the Army grabs your *** and tosses you into gitmo. Shut the @#%^ up.


You need to get out more. So much anger!! So little understanding of the world outside of Bumfuck USA.......

____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 258 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (258)