Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Theodore Roosevelt's on immigrants and AmericansFollow

#27 Jun 25 2007 at 10:25 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
I think we should abolish countries altogether. The entire planet should be seperated into districts and numbered. We'll have a district government and a world government whose sole purpose is to settle dissagreements between district governments (and absolutely nothing else). You elect your district government people who intern elect the world government people. Your city sets it's own laws (so they make sense for your region), terrorists won't exist anymore, there will be no more large armies to bomb people into oblivion.

I also think spinache should be eradicated from the world.
#28 Jun 25 2007 at 10:29 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
It is kind of quaint, in a frustratingly idiotic way. That belief in a myth that never existed with a bunch of opinions based off it and grounded firmly in ones own ignorance of the situation.

Asking you for an opinion is like going to a phrenologist for a reading.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#29 Jun 25 2007 at 11:54 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Metastophicleas said

Quote:
I'm DAMN PROUD to be an American.


You keep drawing little boxes for yourself, dude, and hopefully somebody will come along soon and nail the fucking lid down.

Dropkicks like you are the reason dropkicks like these are able to get away with sh*t like this.

Your (misguided and unjustified) inner feelings of self superiority are the excuse you use to justify to yourself, the invasions, bombings, mass murders and other mistreatments of people you know nothing whatsoever about.

In short, you are an cnut.


Edited, Jun 25th 2007 4:09pm by paulsol
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#30 Jun 25 2007 at 12:26 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Metastophicleas wrote:
What I can tell you is this: Taking pride in ones nation is NOT the same as being a racist. Calling yourself Asian-American, African-American, Italian-American, or whatever stupid XXXX-American you can name yourself is. You place your race above your country.
"Italian" is a race?

Really, what is ultimately meant by "Act like an American" is "Act like a WASP". However, since the WASPs got to plant their flag here first, they got to define what it meant to be "American" and demand that everyone else act as they do, 'lest they be unpatriotic.


You missed the point, obviously. The point, as I have stated, is to unite this country, rather than divide it. Red vs. blue states serve as the first division. Us vs. them, and if you think it's any different, listen to the politicians, pundits, press, read the local commentary pages in the paper. Next division is by racial/ethnic/whatever background, farther separating the populace.

In the end, it doesn't matter if you're white, black, brown, yellow, gay, or straight, we all are part of the same country, and it's time we start thinking like that. This nation was formed on a few ideals that are just as important today as they were 230 years ago. The idea that every man, woman, and child, should have the right to work hard and succeed. That all of us have rights that are undeniable. And that we are all equal. No one can strip those rights, and that's what allows us to be great. We're great because of our people, yet the people of this country would rather separate themselves from one another, and fight over petty differences, rather than unite and be proud of what we have, and what we can do.

It is quite possible to take pride in who you are, without infringing on someone else, or forcing someone to forget where they came from. It's quite possible to take pride in being an American, and not rag on another country. There are many great nations on this planet, the United States is only one of them. The FACT that this nation was built by pull your bootstaps up kinda people, both born here, and immigrated here, is what makes this country great. What's wrong with taking pride in that? I'm not suggesting that we all forget our heritage, just simply that we drop the stupidity, and simply call ourselves Americans. On paper, we're all equal at the start. We're all given the same chance to succeed. Things that stress our differences merely separate us. We need to stress what makes us the same, rather than what makes us different.

Jophiel wrote:
Less so because of "pride" and more so because conditions in their country sucked ***.


So almost every nation on the planet sucked/s ***? Good to know that you at least take a smidgen of pride in the U.S. (I'm sure you're proud to be an American, even if you're pissed that our elected officials at the federal level suck, I'm pissed most of them suck too, hell, I'm pissed that those at the state and local level around here blow more than a cheap hooker with no teeth, I'm just giving you a ribbing).

Bodhi, please use the "vast" amounts of knowledge you have, and enlighten us. Show me where my views are outdated. Please, tell me how dividing a nation into smaller, easier to manipulate groups, is a good thing, except for political reasons.
#31 Jun 25 2007 at 12:35 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
Americans may be decent people individually; in the aggregate, they are entirely ignorant of history, both their own and everyone else's. The elites who rule us are no better. The governing class insists that, from its inception, the United States was granted a special dispensation from God, or Nature, or some mysterious, never to be understood combination of galactic forces: we have been endowed with the "Truth" and the One True Way.

It is our mission to share this Truth with the rest of the world. When some of the "lesser peoples" unaccountably resist recognizing the Truth which belongs to us and to us alone...well, that's why God gave us the greatest military the world has ever seen.

If resistance by these "others" proves especially nettlesome...well, that's why nukes were invented. Why would God, or Nature, or the galactic forces provide such bounty to the United States if we were not meant to use it -- or at least threaten to use it?

After all, serious leaders know that all options must be kept on the table. Our table is the whole damned planet, baby! The fact that we are willing to obliterate it in its entirety and turn all of life into dust only proves the strength of our dedication to What Is Right.

If we knew anything about history, we would know that all such claims have been made many times before. Every notable civilization of the past was convinced it was the recipient of special favor; each fervently believed it was unique in this respect.

We are not even unique in our claim to being unique. So it goes. And so they went, all those past civilizations. So we will, too -- and soon, if we continue on our present path. In our determination to prevent anyone from questioning our status as Ultimate Guardians of the Truth, we may take the whole game down with us.
Arthur Silber

'Nuff said.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#32 Jun 25 2007 at 12:38 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
paulsol the Righteous wrote:
Metastophicleas said

Quote:
I'm DAMN PROUD to be an American.


You keep drawing little boxes for yourself, dude, and hopefully somebody will come along soon and nail the fucking lid down.

Dropkicks like you are the reason dropkicks like these are able to get away with sh*t like this.

Your (misguided and unjustified) inner feelings of self superiority are the excuse you use to justify to yourself, the invasions, bombings, mass murders and other mistreatments of people you know nothing whatsoever about.

In short, you are an cnut.


Way to add something relevant to the conversation. Did you come up with that by yourself, or did CNN help you? Wait, I know, it was Michael Moore.

See, I can toss insults without any factual basis too.

Being proud of my country has nothing to do with the waste of space in the federal government. I didn't vote for the guy, so by default, I'm supposed to drop all semblance of love for my country? Yeah, I'll get right on that.

Policy of hating ourselves is what morons have been doing for a long time. It shows an in-ability to stand up for what one believes in, and usually leads to people like this taking over an wrecking shop for the rest of us, forcing us to stand up for you.



Edit: Here's a question for you: Do you take pride in your country?

Edited, Jun 25th 2007 4:40pm by Metastophicleas
#33 Jun 25 2007 at 12:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Metastophicleas wrote:
You missed the point, obviously. The point, as I have stated, is to unite this country, rather than divide it.
Not at all. The point is that the great bulk of those calling for people to act "American" are looking to have them act like the WASP colonists from Britian. That's certainly what Roosevelt was after when he called upon immigrants to become "in every facet an American". That's what people are going for today -- to get those Mexicans to speak nice, accentless English and get respectable jobs that require suits and stop playing that damn Reggaetón so loud at the traffic signals and, for the love of God, keep Spanish OFF of the ATMs.

Although I'll grant you that if we all acted the same as they want, we'd be united in action. I'm just wondering why it has to be the gold standard.
Quote:
So almost every nation on the planet sucked/s ***?
For the folks leaving? Sure. There's always exceptions (such as the colonial mercantile era) but, by in large, you don't sell your stuff and take a steamer across the Atlantic with only a suitcase if you had it sweet back in the Old Country.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#34 Jun 25 2007 at 1:04 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Metastophicleas wrote:
You missed the point, obviously. The point, as I have stated, is to unite this country, rather than divide it.
Not at all. The point is that the great bulk of those calling for people to act "American" are looking to have them act like the WASP colonists from Britian. That's certainly what Roosevelt was after when he called upon immigrants to become "in every facet an American". That's what people are going for today -- to get those Mexicans to speak nice, accentless English and get respectable jobs that require suits and stop playing that damn Reggaetón so loud at the traffic signals and, for the love of God, keep Spanish OFF of the ATMs.


Well, I think that English should be the national language, mostly because it's been what we've spoken for a few hundred years now, so you know. I'm not as concerned with the accent though, I like most Hispanic accents, and thing they add flavor to the language, and are usually easy to understand.

I'm more concerned with the divisions amongst us as Americans though, than I'm worried about illegal immigrants. I, like many people, don't like the idea of the government dividing us because of the color of our skin. I think that it does more harm than good. Kids grow up thinking they're something that they're not, or that they're less than someone else, because of what they have to check on a piece of paper before a test. I think that once you are an American, that's it. You don't need anything in front of it, nor do you need to worry about being anything else. You're not black, white, yellow, you're American.

Quote:
Although I'll grant you that if we all acted the same as they want, we'd be united in action. I'm just wondering why it has to be the gold standard.
Quote:
So almost every nation on the planet sucked/s ***?
For the folks leaving? Sure. There's always exceptions (such as the colonial mercantile era) but, by in large, you don't sell your stuff and take a steamer across the Atlantic with only a suitcase if you had it sweet back in the Old Country.


Valid point, but there were many wealthy people that came here to increase their riches too.

As far as the gold standard, why not? I think that it's important to understand where you've come from, but even more important to understand where you're going. Once people take possession of being Americans first, I think that you'll see more people that want to understand why they've been screwed by their government, and want to change it. I think that you'll also finally see what people have been "trying" to do for years, and eliminate a lot of racial stress, which I think is getting worse in some communities, because of Affirmative Action, which has been outdated for 20 years now. It only took one generation to convince most people that blacks are just as good as whites, and that people of every color can be great, or suck. Greatness knows no color, neither does suckitude.
#35 Jun 25 2007 at 1:08 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
As far as the gold standard, why not?
If you want me to change my identity/language/culture/etc to conform with what you feel is proper, you're going to need a better argument as to why yours is superior than "why not?"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Jun 25 2007 at 1:23 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Ah, I missed part of the statement. What I was getting at was the populace taking pride on coming here as an immigrant (or being born here), and taking pride in what they accomplished. Becoming a citizen of this country is somewhat easy, if not a long process. People should take pride in the fact that they made it through, not separate themselves from the country they just joined buy throwing somewhat meaningless titles in front of it.

Same goes for those born here, you aren't from wherever you are claiming, so you're only lying about your origin. Drop the X-American crap.

There is very little influence from where people came from left in this country. We have a culture that is whole by itself. There is little linking the United States of today with the original settlers left. I think it's important that people entering this country, that wish to be here for longer than a few months, should be required to learn English, and acclimate themselves to the country. I wouldn't move to France, expecting everyone to learn American English just for me, so why should it be any different here? Why should we be expected to conform to those that come here, when no sane country or populace on the planet would?

Last time I was overseas, I learned some basics of the languages that I was going to encounter, just so that I could at least ask where to eat and ****. I wasn't so arrogant as to expect them to bend over backwards for me. It irks me to no end to see our country doing just that, and saddens me at that same time, knowing that it's like that because we have people that desire power so much, that they would sell out their own country to gain that power.


Edit: Completely off topic, just played LOTRO finally, and I am completely hooked.

Edited, Jun 25th 2007 5:24pm by Metastophicleas
#37 Jun 25 2007 at 1:29 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Metastophicleas wrote:
I wouldn't move to France, expecting everyone to learn American English just for me, so why should it be any different here?
I've always hated that comparison. Given the heavy Latino populations in many urban areas, it'd be a closer comparison to say "I would learn Cantonese if I went to Hong Kong despite the fact that there's about a quarter million English speakers there who I could converse and work with."
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#38 Jun 25 2007 at 1:38 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Ok, here's a more accurate example, when I was in the Middle East I learned some Arabic, because I didn't expect enough people to speak English. I only knew enough to carry on the most basic conversations, but I knew what I needed to know to get around.
#39 Jun 25 2007 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
Metastophicleas wrote:
Ok, here's a more accurate example, when I was in the Middle East I learned some Arabic, because I didn't expect enough people to speak English. I only knew enough to carry on the most basic conversations, but I knew what I needed to know to get around.


No, Joph's example was more accurate, you fUckwit.

Non-conformity is a pretty basic part of being American, in my book. Demanding that others change to fit your view of how they should live their lives is pretty thoroughly un-American. Of course, I'm a little more secure in my identity than you are, clearly. I'd wager I'm also a lot more confident of sexuality, too.
#40 Jun 25 2007 at 1:44 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
. It shows an in-ability to stand up for what one believes in,


If the most worthwhile thing one can find to 'believe in' is some sort of 'pride' in a geographical location, and the sense of belonging to a 'tribe' of 250 million people whom you are nevr going to meet( and most likely would ignore, if you did) then yeah, I think thats pretty sad.

What is it you DO believe in?

Harley davidson motorcycles? Apple Pie? Your military capability? Paris Hilton?

Quote:

Policy of hating ourselves is what morons have been doing for a long time. It shows an in-ability to stand up for what one believes in, and usually leads to people like this taking over an wrecking shop for the rest of us, forcing us to stand up for you.



I dont think its anything to do with 'hating yourself', or not. I do believe its all about having some humility and accepting that other people have the right to live as they see fit.

By all means wallow around in your percieved self-worth, but like I said, that self-worth, when it becomes a feeling of superiority over others, enables people like the example you gave and the examples I gave to exploit that 'patriotism' to the point where aggression against people not in your 'tribe' becomes not only tolerated and acceptable, but desirable.

Quote:
We need to stress what makes us the same, rather than what makes us different.


only if you feel that a nation full of clones is a good thing....


Personally I prefer the 'celebrate our diversity' line of thinking.


Quote:
Here's a question for you: Do you take pride in your country?


I'm proud of our non-nuclear policy. And of the beauty of our land. I'm also pretty happy with the way our prime Minister stuck to her guns about not getting involved in Bush's scheme for world domination.

But 'proud' of my country? not as such no.

I would defend what is my family and home to the death, but would I blindly follow the orders of my countries leaders in the name of 'patriotism'? No.

I think that throughout the history of mankind, people who want to be in charge have exploited the herding instinct of other people by drawing lines, labelling, classifying and using terms like 'patriotism' and 'national pride' to manipulate the unthinking masses into believing that they are somehow more deserving than people who arn't in their particular club/religeon/vaterlandhomeland.

Seems like you are falling for it......

____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#41 Jun 25 2007 at 2:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Metastophicleas wrote:
Ok, here's a more accurate example
How is that more accurate? Granted, I'm primarily discussing Latino immigrants, but there's a great many areas in the country where you can work, live and socialize with only Spanish speaking people without running out of folks to talk to. Pretty much the same as me going to live in one of the English-heavy regions of Hong Kong and choosing to work, live and socialize with the quarter-million English speakers there rather than learn Cantonese.

The greatest push to learn a new language is necessity and saying "I'd be sure to learn Oshivambo if I moved to Nambia, wouldn't you??" isn't nearly the same thing as saying "They should learn English as soon as they come here".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#42 Jun 25 2007 at 2:16 PM Rating: Decent
Yodabunny wrote:
I think we should abolish countries altogether.


You know, I agree.

Well, not "abolish" countries as such, but if everyone could just stop pretending that because you are born within some administrative border drawn by some bureaucrats on a map, you are fundamentally different from the rest of the planet, it would be a huge step forward in humanity's journey.

It's also painfully obvious we should have a world government in one form or another. Global warming, wars, pollution, drugs, all the major problems in the world today don't really respect our beloved borders.

We'll come to it sooner or later anyway, so I'm not worried, but if for once we could do it before some major catastrophy opens our eyes and forces our hand, that would also be swell.

Quote:
I also think spinache should be eradicated from the world.


Now that, I totally disagree.

Spinach are full of yums.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#43 Jun 25 2007 at 2:17 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I think some of you are missing at least part of the point here.

We can debate exactly what it means to be an "American". We can even debate whether it's a good thing to be proud to be an American.

However, whatever those things are, clearly there are a whole lot of people who want to share in it. Say what you will about how we do things, it clearly works, else why would so many millions of people risk life and limb to come here?


It's that "thing" (whatever it is) that is both why people want to be here, and what we should be proud of. It's not important to define it. Clearly, it exists. I think the more relevant point is that if you left your country and came here to live, doesn't it make more sense to become a part of that which you choose to leave your country for? Why insist that America change to suit you? Shouldn't it be the other way around?

And I'm not talking about minor cultural influences here. Historically, immigrants have brought their stories, their food, and their customs to our shores, all to everyone's benefit. But they largely left their languages, their politics, and their nationalities back wherever they came from (or at least aspired to do so over time). They came here to *be* Americans, not just to live here. Huge difference IMO...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#44 Jun 25 2007 at 2:22 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
and stop playing that damn Reggaetón so loud at the traffic signals


Well, in fairness, it is fUcking Shite.



Edited, Jun 25th 2007 10:22pm by RedPhoenixxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#45 Jun 25 2007 at 2:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
But they largely left their languages, their politics, and their nationalities back wherever they came from (or at least aspired to do so over time). They came here to *be* Americans, not just to live here. Huge difference IMO...
Of course. That explains the Polish neighborhoods in Chicago, the Russian neighborhoods, the Lithuanian neighborhoods, Greektown, Chinatown, Serbian enclaves in the suburbs, Swedish enclaves up near Wisconsin, etc. That's just within spitting distance of me and doesn't represent enthic enclaves in other parts of the country.

All people who gave up their language, politics and nationalities to just be Americans, huh?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#46 Jun 25 2007 at 2:33 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Of course. That explains the Polish neighborhoods in Chicago


White.

Quote:
the Russian neighborhoods


White.

Quote:
the Lithuanian neighborhoods


White.

Quote:
Greektown


White.

Quote:
Chinatown


Hard working.

Quote:
Serbian enclaves in the suburbs


White.


Quote:
Swedish enclaves up near Wisconsin


Hawt.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#47 Jun 25 2007 at 4:47 PM Rating: Default
paulsol the Righteous wrote:


I think that throughout the history of mankind, people who want to be in charge have exploited the herding instinct of other people by drawing lines, labelling, classifying and using terms like 'patriotism' and 'national pride' to manipulate the unthinking masses into believing that they are somehow more deserving than people who arn't in their particular club/religeon/vaterlandhomeland.

Seems like you are falling for it......



Actually, patriotism didn't become common until the later 1800's when the nations of Greece, France, etc. began to identify themselves as their own countries and wanting to not be ruled by someone who was not in touch with the issues that they were dealing with.

Edit: just edit for grammar

Edited, Jun 25th 2007 8:47pm by Lordofdogs
#48 Jun 25 2007 at 4:57 PM Rating: Default
gbaji wrote:

It's that "thing" (whatever it is) that is both why people want to be here, and what we should be proud of. It's not important to define it. Clearly, it exists. I think the more relevant point is that if you left your country and came here to live, doesn't it make more sense to become a part of that which you choose to leave your country for? Why insist that America change to suit you? Shouldn't it be the other way around?

But they largely left their languages, their politics, and their nationalities back wherever they came from (or at least aspired to do so over time). They came here to *be* Americans, not just to live here. Huge difference IMO...


actually you are wrong; when america was in its growing stages many large cities had ghettos for many nationalities. These ghettos were places where people of similar nationalities lived together and prospered (not the poor districts of towns), much like many heavy Latino speaking towns/districts today. I'm sure when the people moved to America many were able to live without having to learn the english language.

These ghettos usually grew into mini-towns within larger towns and are still there today. If you want to dispute me then don't tell me there isn't a little Italy or Chinatown in the major cities.
#49 Jun 25 2007 at 5:24 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
But they largely left their languages, their politics, and their nationalities back wherever they came from (or at least aspired to do so over time). They came here to *be* Americans, not just to live here. Huge difference IMO...
Of course. That explains the Polish neighborhoods in Chicago, the Russian neighborhoods, the Lithuanian neighborhoods, Greektown, Chinatown, Serbian enclaves in the suburbs, Swedish enclaves up near Wisconsin, etc. That's just within spitting distance of me and doesn't represent enthic enclaves in other parts of the country.

All people who gave up their language, politics and nationalities to just be Americans, huh?



I didn't say "all". I said they "largely left their languages...". Not all. Most. Enough of a majority that the communities they formed could not manage to exist as separate enclaves with only those other languages spoken. Enough understood that in order to succeed they would need to adopt the language and customs of their new country. It's not like they suddenly forgot everything about their countries of origin, but they made an active choice to learn and embrace everything they could about the new one.

The issue is one of scale. Clearly, this was enough of an issue back in Roosevelt's day for him to mention it. But it was nothing compared to what we're seeing now. Lots of people try to pretend that this is no different then any other wave of immigration, but that's simply not the case. I'm not aware of any point in time in US history where we could realistically estimate somewhere around 3-5% of the entire US population consists of people who natively speak a language other then English.

Add in the concentration of those people into a small number of states and specific communities within those states, and you've got something on a scale that simply dwarfs the "little<nationoforigin>" neighborhoods of the past. I'm not advocating a specific course of action, but I do think it's silly to just bury your head in the sand and pretend that this issn't an issue.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#50 Jun 25 2007 at 5:28 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Lordofdogs wrote:
These ghettos usually grew into mini-towns within larger towns and are still there today. If you want to dispute me then don't tell me there isn't a little Italy or Chinatown in the major cities.


You don't live in Southern California, Arizona, New Mexico, or Texas do you?

Do not even remotely compare a little Italy type neighborhood to what's going on here. Not unless you've lived in the area for some time. You simply don't understand. They aren't even in the same league.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#51 Jun 25 2007 at 5:37 PM Rating: Default
gbaji wrote:
Lordofdogs wrote:
These ghettos usually grew into mini-towns within larger towns and are still there today. If you want to dispute me then don't tell me there isn't a little Italy or Chinatown in the major cities.


You don't live in Southern California, Arizona, New Mexico, or Texas do you?

Do not even remotely compare a little Italy type neighborhood to what's going on here. Not unless you've lived in the area for some time. You simply don't understand. They aren't even in the same league.


I lived near chicago and on the border of a 90% Hispanic speaking city. I'm refering to how they must have been back then... it was just speculation as to how it might have been, given time the children and children of their children will learn english (hopefully) and assimilate into the American norm.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 158 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (158)