Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Godless Evolution in KansasFollow

#1 Jun 24 2007 at 12:13 AM Rating: Default
*
113 posts
Wooho for first post in the asylum. This is a bit old, so sorry if it is a repost. Fiancee from Kansas showed me this one since I didn't believe it when she said it.

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/55807

Quote:
TOPEKA, KS—In response to a Nov. 7 referendum, Kansas lawmakers passed emergency legislation outlawing evolution, the highly controversial process responsible for the development and diversity of species and the continued survival of all life.

Lawmakers decried spontaneous genetic mutations.
"From now on, the streets, forests, plains, and rivers of Kansas will be safe from the godless practice of evolution, and species will be able to procreate without deviating from God's intended design," said Bob Bethell, a member of the state House of Representatives. "This is about protecting the integrity of all creation."

The sweeping new law prohibits all living beings within state borders from being born with random genetic mutations that could make them better suited to evade predators, secure a mate, or, adapt to a changing environment. In addition, it bars any sexual reproduction, battles for survival, or instances of pure happenstance that might lead, after several generations, to a more well-adapted species or subspecies.

Violators of the new law may face punishments that include jail time, stiff fines, and rehabilitative education and training to rid organisms suspected of evolutionary tendencies. Repeat offenders could face chemical sterilization.

To enforce the law, Kansas state police will be trained to investigate and apprehend organisms who exhibit suspected signs of evolutionary behavior, such as natural selection or speciation. Plans are underway to track and monitor DNA strands in every Kansan life form for even the slightest change in allele frequencies.

"Barn swallows that develop lighter, more streamlined builds to enable faster migration, for example, could live out the rest of their brief lives in prison," said Indiana University chemist and pro-intelligent-design author Robert Hellenbaum, who helped compose the language of the law. "And butterflies who mimic the wing patterns and colors of other butterflies for an adaptive advantage, well, their days of flouting God's will are over."

Human beings may be the species most deeply affected by the new legislation. Those whose cytochrome-c molecules vary less than 2 percent from those of chimpanzees will be in direct violation of the law.

Under particular scrutiny are single-cell microorganisms, with thousands of field labs being installed across the state to ensure that these self-replicating molecules, notorious for mutation, do not do so in a fashion benefitting their long-term survival.

Anti-evolutionists such as Hellenbaum have long accused microorganisms of popularizing "an otherwise obscure, agonizingly slow, and hard-to-understand" biological process. "These repeat offenders are at the root of the problem," Hellenbaum said. "We have the fossil records to prove it."

"No species is exempt," said Marcus Holloway, a state police spokesman. "Whether you're a human being or a fruit fly—if we detect one homologous chromosome trying to cross over during the process of meiosis, you will be punished to the full extent of the law."

Although the full impact of the new law will likely not be felt for approximately 10 million years, most Kansans say they are relieved that the ban went into effect this week, claiming that evolution may have gone too far already.

"If Earth's species were meant to change over successive generations through physical modifications resulting from the adaptation to environmental challenges, then God would have given them the genetic predisposition to select mates and reproduce based on their favorable heritable traits and their ability to thrive under changing conditions so that these advantageous qualities would be passed down and eventually encoded into the DNA of each generation of offspring," Olathe public school teacher and creationist Joyce Eckhardt said. "It's just not natural."

Some warn that the strict wording of the law could have a deleterious effect on Kansas' mostly agricultural economy, since it also prohibits all forms of man-made artificial selection, such as plant hybridization, genetic engineering, and animal husbandry. A police raid on an alleged artificial-insemination facility outside McPherson, KS on Friday resulted in the arrest of a farmer, a veterinarian, four assistants, one bull, and several dozen cows.

Agribusiness leaders, who rely on evolution science to genetically modify crops, have voiced concerns about doing business with Kansas farmers.

"If Kansans want to ban evolution, that is their right, but they must understand that we rely on a certain flexibility in the natural order of things to be able to deliver healthy food products to millions of Americans," said Carl Casale, a vice president with the agricultural giant Monsanto. "We're not talking about playing God here. We are talking about succeeding in the competitive veggie-burger market."
#2 Jun 24 2007 at 12:53 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Smiley: deadhorse
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#3 Jun 24 2007 at 2:50 AM Rating: Decent
****
8,619 posts
Quote:
highly controversial process
Smiley: dubious not since the 1950's it's not.

Cow; If you're going to post a news story it requires you to at least make a comment explaining your view beyond "I don't believe it!!1!!oneone!!eleven!"

nice to have new poster but i must mark you as "Must try harder" Smiley: schooled
#4 Jun 24 2007 at 3:32 AM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Cowgomoo wrote:
www.theonion.com

Ignorant much?
#5 Jun 24 2007 at 3:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Allegory wrote:
Cowgomoo wrote:
www.theonion.com

Ignorant much?


Most of me initially hoped that he was kidding, but without any previous knowledge of the poster, and an above rudimentary understanding of the overall intelligence level of most people who cross-post complete ********* I'm guessing that he's just *that* stupid. I hope that his betrothed is an idiot too, because otherwise, it's just mean to scare him like that...though she'll have an amusing life.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#6 Jun 24 2007 at 3:55 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Cowgomoo wrote:
This is a bit old,



November 28, 2006


Old, it is down right prehistoric.

Did u cee wut I deed dar?
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#7 Jun 24 2007 at 4:49 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Nexa wrote:
Allegory wrote:
Cowgomoo wrote:
www.theonion.com

Ignorant much?


Most of me initially hoped that he was kidding, but without any previous knowledge of the poster, and an above rudimentary understanding of the overall intelligence level of most people who cross-post complete bullsh*t, I'm guessing that he's just *that* stupid. I hope that his betrothed is an idiot too, because otherwise, it's just mean to scare him like that...though she'll have an amusing life.

Nexa

Every woman looks for a guy who can make her laugh. This woman is set for life if she holds the brain of the couple.
#8 Jun 24 2007 at 5:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
DSD wrote:

Every woman looks for a guy who can make her laugh. This woman is set for life if she holds the brain of the couple.


Possibly, but being with someone you know not to be your intellectual equal gets boring after a while and a sort of resentment develops unless the other person has other qualities that bring the relationship to some sort of equal footing. Maybe he's great in the sack, but I tend to doubt it.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#9 Jun 24 2007 at 5:44 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
Nexa wrote:
Maybe he's great in the sack, but I tend to doubt it.

You mean like it's really big? Or shaved? What do women go for in that category?

#10 Jun 24 2007 at 6:53 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
DSD wrote:
Every woman looks for a guy who can make her laugh. This woman is set for life if she holds the brain of the couple.

I don't think this is a brains kind of operation.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#11 Jun 24 2007 at 7:17 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
trickybeck wrote:
Nexa wrote:
Maybe he's great in the sack, but I tend to doubt it.

You mean like it's really big? Or shaved? What do women go for in that category?



The ability to know what to do. And to mix it up from time to time Smiley: sly
#12 Jun 24 2007 at 7:20 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
DSD wrote:
trickybeck wrote:
Nexa wrote:
Maybe he's great in the sack, but I tend to doubt it.

You mean like it's really big? Or shaved? What do women go for in that category?



The ability to know what to do. And to mix it up from time to time Smiley: sly


Seconded.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#13 Jun 24 2007 at 10:21 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

My pun was lost apparently...


#14 Jun 24 2007 at 10:39 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

My pun was lost apparently...


No, everyone got it, it was just reaching and yet unfunny. *******, sack. Haha. Feel better?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#15 Jun 24 2007 at 10:40 AM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

Not the people who responded.

#16 Jun 24 2007 at 10:45 AM Rating: Decent
Meh this thread was not what i excepted...
#17 Jun 24 2007 at 12:01 PM Rating: Decent
*
113 posts
Meh, I guess I'll explain further. She is from Olathe, which happens to be a major part of the fricked up portion of Kansas. Her school outlawed evoultion while she was attending it due to ignorant parents.

I personally found this a funny spinoff on the whole story though. I normally post within the FFXI forums, so I guess you guys wouldn't know I'm full of ******** knowledge, stories, and sarcasm. However, apologies for not introducing myself.

On that note, 18/M/OH and I enjoy...starting debates and pissing people off.
#18 Jun 24 2007 at 12:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
When I was taking my American government class, we had to submit a weekly newspaper article and analysis on a political event. The first week one was due, some foreign dude submitted his on the Onion article U.S. Protests Mexi-Canadian Overpass. It was funny except kind of sad as well because the guy was obviously sincere in submitting it. The teacher gave him a pass for the week and explained that the Onion wasn't a real paper.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#19 Jun 24 2007 at 12:18 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
trickybeck wrote:

Not the people who responded.



No, we got it. We just played our own way. I notice doing so seems make you soo grumpy. And I dont know why, but that makes me giggle Smiley: smile
#20 Jun 24 2007 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
DSD wrote:
trickybeck wrote:

Not the people who responded.



No, we got it. We just played our own way. I notice doing so seems make you soo grumpy. And I dont know why, but that makes me giggle Smiley: smile
That's because the thought that he's smarter than just about anyone else is what keeps tricky warm at night. Why are you fornicating with his binky? [:emo:]
#21 Jun 24 2007 at 12:39 PM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
because I find it amusing?
#22 Jun 24 2007 at 1:09 PM Rating: Default
xD nice, theonion-spoof news
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 227 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (227)