Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Now I've seen a lot of movies...Follow

#77 Jun 24 2007 at 7:42 AM Rating: Decent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Yanari wrote:
That's why I didn't suggest you try to watch it!


hehe, while I understand that some of the scenes that most troubled me in the book have been at least toned-down, I still don't feel like I would gain anything by seeing it. I'm not as big a Kubrick fan as most folks are, though I love 2001 despite it's differences from the novel (which I also adore...I just treat them as two entirely seperate works).

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#78 Jun 24 2007 at 10:51 AM Rating: Decent
**
557 posts
Hmm. No movies with Clint Eastwood or John Wayne. Not that they were/are superb actors, but I kinda think that some of the films had an impact on the industry. I would personally like to see 'Unforgiven' on the list, but whatever.

Also, no Willy Wonka, again not an extremely good movie, but it surely turned quite a few heads.

Quote:
49. "Intolerance," 1916.


Ill make sure to catch that next time I'm out at the moving picture show.

Edited, Jun 24th 2007 2:52pm by TWA
#79 Jun 24 2007 at 12:02 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
When Jonwin is home, he tends to watch Turner Classic Movies, all day long, so I seen far more of these then I would on my own. Though I did watch many of them growing up too.

I have the hots for all of Gregory Peck's films. He very dashing in North by Northwest.

To Kill a Mockingbird, is my favorite though. Only now that I read the book, I have to say it's only a well done shadow of the original. Too bad Harper Lee never finish any of her other novels, since.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#80 Jun 24 2007 at 2:15 PM Rating: Decent
Quote:
Hmm. No movies with Clint Eastwood or John Wayne. Not that they were/are superb actors, but I kinda think that some of the films had an impact on the industry. I would personally like to see 'Unforgiven' on the list, but whatever.


Actually, "Unforgiven" is on the list (no. 68). It should have been much higher though, make that top 20 or 10 even imo. Magnificent movie, great performances!


Edited, Jun 25th 2007 12:15am by Zieveraar
#81 Jun 24 2007 at 2:53 PM Rating: Default
**
269 posts
Where the **** is Fight Club and V for Vendetta?
#82 Jun 24 2007 at 3:11 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
RaistlinDying wrote:
Where the @#%^ is Fight Club and V for Vendetta?

Right where they belong, in the "mediocre hits of the past decade" category.

Elne wrote:
I have the hots for all of Gregory Peck's films. He very dashing in North by Northwest.

While I did enjoy that movie (especially the Hudson River scenery during the train ride; that's up in my home country) I spent most of the last fifteen minutes or so yelling at the TV "DROP THE BITCH!! JUST DROP HER! DROP HER!"

Ok, so I'm not much of a romantic.

____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#83 Jun 25 2007 at 3:20 AM Rating: Good
I've seen about 50 of those films, and i'm not impressed with this list either.

Starting with the number 1. I've actually watched Citizen Kane, and it was, well, pretty boring. I know Wells invented the flashback, and I'm sure this film was revolutionanry in its day, but by today's standard, it's nothing special.

On the whole, I agree with Nobby that these lists are incredibly stupid. Had they called it "Films you should see before you die" or something, then maybe.

And yeah, the lack of foreign films is a joke. Though at least they inculded Chaplin's finest, which is cool. He is totally underrated in the UK, and the man was clearly a genius.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#84 Jun 25 2007 at 12:55 PM Rating: Good
****
5,311 posts
Quote:
I have the hots for all of Gregory Peck's films. He very dashing in North by Northwest.
That's actually Cary Grant (yum) in North by Northwest. Gregory is awfully pretty in another Hitchcock film, Spellbound.
#85 Jun 25 2007 at 1:00 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
TWA wrote:
Hmm. No movies with Clint Eastwood or John Wayne. Not that they were/are superb actors, but I kinda think that some of the films had an impact on the industry. I would personally like to see 'Unforgiven' on the list, but whatever.[/i]


The Searchers is on the list.
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#86 Jun 25 2007 at 1:04 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Nexa wrote:
I still don't feel like I would gain anything by seeing it.
You wouldn't. It stays very faithful to the novel but the upshot to that is that it doesn't try to do anything new with the material.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#87 Jun 25 2007 at 1:53 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
If All quiet on the Western Front isn't on a 'best films of all time list', then the list is obviously kack.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#88 Jun 26 2007 at 11:29 AM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
paulsol the Righteous wrote:
If All quiet on the Western Front isn't on a 'best films of all time list', then the list is obviously kack.
So true, definitely top 100, I just realized Field of Dreams is not on the list either.
#89 Jun 26 2007 at 7:09 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
***
1,166 posts
The list seems different from the last one they put out a couple years ago, I am going to have to do some research I guess.
____________________________
Over the last 15 months, we've traveled to every corner of the United States. I've now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.

Barack Obama

Laen - 105 Dru
Haam - 105 Sk
Laosha - 105 Shammy
Lutan - 105 Bard
#90 Jun 26 2007 at 8:37 PM Rating: Good
LOL 68 of these, and my favorites didn't make the list. Hmm....
#91 Jun 26 2007 at 8:44 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts
alwayslost wrote:
The list seems different from the last one they put out a couple years ago, I am going to have to do some research I guess.

It is. This is their updated list, I suppose.

#92 Jun 27 2007 at 4:50 AM Rating: Decent
*****
15,952 posts
While there *is* a reason to say these types of lists are pointless, there are also some very good reasons to make these types of lists (even if they are inevitably going to be flawed).

The main good reason, is that such a list can introduce new people to some really good things. Such lists can be a real public service, spreading the joy of good stuff around.

Of course, with such a HUGE amount of movies/books/songs/whatever around, there are always going to be enourmous injustices, as there are so many things that ought to have made the top 100.

And yes, so much of this is subjective. And people, professionals, specialists and academics also have different criteria by which they judge what is good, and what is not.

I like it that people make an effort at such things, though.

Oh, I've seen a minimum of 44 of them, and suspect a couple more.

I don't really agree with Titanic and Forrest Gump (although I do like Titanic, just not THAT much). I could write a heap about why Toy Story, Pulp Fiction and The Sixth Sense deserve to be considered great, but I don't want to turn this into a wall of text.

Short story: they are all *very* strong on structure, script, acting, moral integrety, direction, and style.

A short example: Whilst Pulp Fiction is very violent, every person who makes a decision to leave behind the criminal world gets out successfully and has a happy ending, whilst everyone who remains in the criminal world either dies or has something *extremely* unpleasant happen to them. That's a very positive moral lesson, and yet I don't think anyone would feel like they had been preached to whilst watching this movie.

Edited, Jun 27th 2007 8:54am by Aripyanfar
#93 Jun 27 2007 at 5:21 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Aripyanfar wrote:
A short example: Whilst Pulp Fiction is very violent, every person who makes a decision to leave behind the criminal world gets out successfully and has a happy ending, whilst everyone who remains in the criminal world either dies or has something *extremely* unpleasant happen to them. That's a very positive moral lesson, and yet I don't think anyone would feel like they had been preached to whilst watching this movie.
Personally, I thought Reservoir Dogs was a stronger film and unfolded better as far as plot or drama or whatever cinematic term goes.

Although it has less of a moral lesson unless you want to count "Everyone dies" as a lesson Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#94 Jun 27 2007 at 11:23 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Personally, I thought Reservoir Dogs was a stronger film and unfolded better as far as plot or drama or whatever cinematic term goes.

Although it has less of a moral lesson unless you want to count "Everyone dies" as a lesson Smiley: laugh

Pink doesn't die, if you listen very closely in the end he surrenders!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#95 Jun 27 2007 at 11:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
True dat. I even know exactly what you're talking about. Mea cupla and I posted in haste.

I stand by it being a better "film" though.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#96 Jun 29 2007 at 10:38 AM Rating: Decent
*****
15,952 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Aripyanfar wrote:
A short example: Whilst Pulp Fiction is very violent, every person who makes a decision to leave behind the criminal world gets out successfully and has a happy ending, whilst everyone who remains in the criminal world either dies or has something *extremely* unpleasant happen to them. That's a very positive moral lesson, and yet I don't think anyone would feel like they had been preached to whilst watching this movie.
Personally, I thought Reservoir Dogs was a stronger film and unfolded better as far as plot or drama or whatever cinematic term goes.

Although it has less of a moral lesson unless you want to count "Everyone dies" as a lesson Smiley: laugh


lol, yes, Resevoir Dogs did remind me extremely strongly of Ancient Greek, and Shakesperean tradgedies. The completeness of the field of death, with a very few (minor, unknown) people staggering around the battlefield/family castle at the end.



Edited, Jun 29th 2007 2:40pm by Aripyanfar
#97 Jun 29 2007 at 10:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
My kid scandalized me the other day by saying that he saw Alien Vs Predator at his uncle's house. Not because of the movie rating, but because that's such a ****** movie to be exposed to.


So I made him sit and watch Aliens last night instead Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#98 Jun 29 2007 at 11:32 AM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
My kid scandalized me the other day by saying that he saw Alien Vs Predator at his uncle's house. Not because of the movie rating, but because that's such a sh*tty movie to be exposed to.


Could have been worse though, could have been Aliens 4. At least AVP was entertaining.
#99 Jun 29 2007 at 11:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I refuse to acknowledge anything after Aliens.

It was an excellent first film and sequel. And then it ended. What? I can't HEAR YOU LALALALALALALALALALA!!!!!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#100 Jun 29 2007 at 5:22 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
/agreed on Aliens. Afterall, that was the last one with Weirzbowski in it, right?


I think most of the seemingly unexplainable inclusions have to do with the idea of them being a "new idea". Some great classics fall off the list because while they are great classics, they weren't really anything new (just very very well done). That's about the only explaination for something like Toy Story being on the list.

I am completely baffled by Titanic though. That film was "big", but it certainly wasn't new, or original, or even particularly well done. Honestly, if we're going to put big overbudget films on the list, Waterworld is better then Titanic (in the aquatic theme). Heck. You could even argue that it was a much more original idea then Titanic as well.

Oh well. It's just a list...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#101 Jun 29 2007 at 9:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
WIERZBOWSKI!!!!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 165 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (165)