Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

In the **** Industry?Follow

#1 Jun 13 2007 at 6:49 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
You might want to rethink your career path if you live in Iran

Iran moves to execute **** stars
Quote:

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) -- Iran's parliament on Wednesday voted in favor of a bill that could lead to death penalty for persons convicted of working in the production of pornographic movies.

With a 148-5 vote in favor and four abstentions, lawmakers present at the Wednesday session of the 290-seat parliament approved that "producers of pornographic works and main elements in their production are considered corruptors of the world and could be sentenced to punishment as corruptors of the world."

The term, "corruptor of the world" is taken from the Quran, the Muslims' holy book, and ranks among the highest on the scale of an individual's criminal offenses. Under Iran's Islamic Penal Code, it carries a death penalty.

The "main elements" refered to in the draft include producers, directors, cameramen and actors involved in making a pornographic video.

The bill also envisages convictions ranging from one year imprisonment to a death sentence for the main distributors of the movies and also producers of Web sites in which the pornographic works would appear.

Besides videos, the bill covers all electronic visual material, such as DVD and CDs. Other material, such as **** magazines and books are already banned under Iranian law.

To become law, the bill requires an approval by the Guardian Council, a constitutional watchdog in Iran.

It is widely believed that the drafting of the bill came about as a reaction to a scandal last year, when a private videotape, apparently belonging to Iranian actress Zahra Amir Ebrahimi and allegedly showing her having intercourse with a man, became available across Iran.

The videotape was leaked to the Internet and released on a black market DVD, becoming a full-blown Iranian sex tape scandal. Ebrahimi later came under an official investigation, which is still ongoing. She faces fines, whip lashing or worse for her violation of Iran's morality laws.

The unnamed man on the tape, who is suspected of releasing it, reportedly fled to Armenia but was subsequently returned to Iran and charged with breach of public morality laws. He remains in jail.

In an exclusive interview with the British newspaper The Guardian early this year, Ebrahimi denied she was the woman in the film and dismissed it as a fake, made by a vengeful former fiance bent on destroying her career.

In recent years, private videotapes have increasingly been leaked to the public in Iran, riling the government and many in this conservative Islamic country, where open talk of sex is banned and considered taboo.

However, **** material is easily accessible through foreign satellite television channels in Iran. Bootleg video tapes and CDs are also available on the black market on many street corners.


#2 Jun 13 2007 at 6:52 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,160 posts
Biggest injustice ever. We need to pull out of Iraq immediately and invade Iran to stop this.

Edit to add: I'm actually surprised they're going after the male too in the "sex tape scandal". It's pretty much a given that the woman will be lucky to come out of it alive. I guess they deserve a touch of credit for gender equality in some things.

Edited, Jun 13th 2007 10:56am by Zakthan
#3 Jun 13 2007 at 6:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
That genie is not going back in the bottle, fellas. Sorry.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#4 Jun 13 2007 at 9:52 AM Rating: Default
*****
19,369 posts
Samira wrote:
That genie is not going back in the bottle, fellas. Sorry.


But, but I didn't even rub it that hard!
#5 Jun 13 2007 at 9:56 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
MentalFrog wrote:
But, but I didn't even rub it that hard!
If these bastages had been in power a few thousand years ago, Sheherezade would've missed out on 1,001 Arabian Nights and given us a skin-flick and a Daniel Pearl extra-close shave. Smiley: dubious
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#6 Jun 13 2007 at 1:11 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Quote:
To become law, the bill requires an approval by the Guardian Council, a constitutional watchdog in Iran.



Well. It's good to know that they have a constitutional watchdog to make sure that violations of civil liberties and such don't occur...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#7 Jun 13 2007 at 1:51 PM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Well that does it then. I'm out.
#8 Jun 13 2007 at 3:31 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Well. It's good to know that they have a constitutional watchdog to make sure that violations of civil liberties and such don't occur...


The illusion of such things is required to keep most of your moronic idiot citizens from realizing their civil liberties are being destroyed based on preposterous pretexts.

You know how that is, though, right?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#9 Jun 13 2007 at 3:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
What effect is this going to have on PersianPink.com?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Jun 13 2007 at 4:04 PM Rating: Default
*****
19,369 posts
Jophiel wrote:
What effect is this going to have on PersianPink.com?


They'll be forced to quit?

ZOMG! http://www.persianpink.com/
#11 Jun 13 2007 at 6:18 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Well. It's good to know that they have a constitutional watchdog to make sure that violations of civil liberties and such don't occur...


The illusion of such things is required to keep most of your moronic idiot citizens from realizing their civil liberties are being destroyed based on preposterous pretexts.

You know how that is, though, right?


Yes. I do. Which is why I chuckle at the ignorance of people who post stuff like this:

Monsieur RedPhoenixxx wrote:

In proper democracies, you have checks and balances to make sure people don't use money raised through taxes to enhance their *****, real or metaphorical.


and

Monsieur RedPhoenixxx wrote:

They have freedom of Information, published budgets, inquiries, investigations. If those documents are not made public, then it's not a democracy. If Ministry operate without any indepednent oversight, it's not a democracy. If budgets are not passed through the legislature, its not a democracy.



Yeah. I'm well aware that there are many idiots who think that having watchdog groups and "oversight" will magically prevent their government from ever abusing the power they've given it...


I love it when you guys step all over eachother. Makes my whole day really. :)
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#12 Jun 13 2007 at 6:23 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I love it when you guys step all over eachother. Makes my whole day really. :)


Exactly. So long as the morons have the illusion, they could care less about the reality.

QED

Thanks for making it so easy.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#13 Jun 13 2007 at 6:24 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Um... Sure Smash. Whatever you say...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#14 Jun 13 2007 at 6:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You might want to look up the word "independent" and then revisit your post.

Just sayin'.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Jun 13 2007 at 6:25 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Um... Sure Smash. Whatever you say...


I realize you don't understand my point. That is, forgive me, the point.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#16 Jun 13 2007 at 6:42 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
You might want to look up the word "independent" and then revisit your post.

Just sayin'.


I'm talking about the general trust in watchdog organizations Joph. The nature or structure of those groups is not important. The idea that it's ok to overly empower your government because you're protected by groups that will prevent that government from abusing the power you gave it *is*.


Look at the forest, not the trees.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#17 Jun 14 2007 at 1:38 AM Rating: Decent
gbaji wrote:
I'm talking about the general trust in watchdog organizations Joph. The nature or structure of those groups is not important.


And that's exactly why everyone agrees you're a retarded bad-faithed **** monkey.

The "nature and structure" of those groups is *the* most important thing (see what I did there?). That's how you decide whether a body really is part of a genuine democratic institution, or whether it is just a facade to enforce religious ideals.

I don't assume for one second you have any idea what the Guardian Council does, nor that you can being to comprehend the nature of the Iranian regime, but it *not* a democracy. It is a *theocracy* you prick, you know, using religious ideals to shape public morals through legislation?

How very Republican indeed...

So if anything, the Guardian Council is like Iran's Constitutional Court. The equivalent of your Supreme Court.


Quote:
The idea that it's ok to overly empower your government because you're protected by groups that will prevent that government from abusing the power you gave it *is*.


Do you really think this has *anything* to do with the situation in Iran?! Or with the situation in the US? France? Togo?

Think, gbaji, think.

I know it's hard, but make a little effort...


Edited, Jun 14th 2007 1:40pm by RedPhoenixxx
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#18 Jun 14 2007 at 4:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
I'm talking about the general trust in watchdog organizations Joph. The nature or structure of those groups is not important.
Ah, so you just thought you'd pull important qualifiers out of Red's statement and ignore them because they got in the way of you making a point which otherwise would not apply.

Carry on then.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#19 Jun 14 2007 at 6:07 AM Rating: Decent
***
1,784 posts
I feel the need to tell a hilarious Iranian joke, that I once overheard.

Here it goes.


ye torke har shab to khabesh midid ke ba khara footbal bazi mikone, ye rooz pamishe va mire pishe doktor va moshkelesho be doktor mige. Doktor behesh mige ke negaran nabash barat ye daroo midan ke emshab ghabl az khab bokhori va khoob beshi. torke ...

Or rather

Overheard at the Narada Gana Sabha canteen:
Mama: Did you hear the waiter sing Swami Haridasgiri's bhajanai along with the tape as he served us keerai vadai? The waiter at the next table was humming a good Kalyani.
Mami: (sniffing) So, now you want me to sing in the kitchen?
Mama: Ennamma, you have been doing it every morning for thirty years now! Namavali for the milkman, alapanai for the maid, tanam for daughters-in-law, swaraprastara for sons, tukkadas for grandchildren... I get the best, tani avartanam crackling into Tadhinginatom! Tadhinginatom!! TADHINGINATOM!

Haha what a fuckin knee slapper!
















#20 Jun 14 2007 at 2:11 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Monsieur RedPhoenixxx wrote:
I don't assume for one second you have any idea what the Guardian Council does, nor that you can being to comprehend the nature of the Iranian regime, but it *not* a democracy. It is a *theocracy* you prick, you know, using religious ideals to shape public morals through legislation?


/whooosh!

I know exactly what it is. The point (which hasn't managed to sink into your skull yet) is that just because you have organizations with the appearance of being a watchdog group does *not* automatically mean that the result is positive for "the people".

It was exactly the incongruity of having a "constitutional watchdog organization" in a theocracy that I was making a joke about.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#21 Jun 14 2007 at 2:13 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

/whooosh!


Quite.

He's making fun of you. Read it again, oblivious one.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#22 Jun 14 2007 at 2:26 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
gbaji wrote:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum
Double-whooshed there, gobShite.

Oh, and here's a hint. If you keep electing people who erode the electorate's ability to change the people in power, you're heading for a fertile ground for Godwin's.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#23 Jun 14 2007 at 2:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
I know exactly what it is.
Yeah, he totally read my linked Wikipedia article on it!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#24 Jun 14 2007 at 7:39 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
I know exactly what it is.
Yeah, he totally read my linked Wikipedia article on it!
Why do you do this to yourself?
#25 Jun 14 2007 at 7:47 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Shits & giggles, mostly.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#26 Jun 14 2007 at 7:49 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Shits & giggles, mostly.
I'm thinking more the former than the latter.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 169 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (169)