Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Go-go Maine!Follow

#1 Jun 06 2007 at 11:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Quote:
Maine Enacts Real ID Statute

AUGUSTA (AP) -- In January, Maine lawmakers led a national revolt against the Real ID law by passing a resolution objecting to the 2005 act of Congress.

Now, the Maine Legislature's gone a step further by passing a bill prohibiting the state from implementing Real ID . The House and Senate both gave the bill final approval yesterday and it awaits the signature of Governor Baldacci.

The governor opposes Real ID and a spokesman says Baldacci will sign the bill barring the state from joining it.

The program sets a national standard for driver's licenses and requires states to link their record-keeping systems to national databases.

Opponents say it would create a national identity card system. Those cards would be valuable to identity thieves. Opponents also see the cards as an invasion of privacy.

The law's supporters say Real ID is needed to prevent terrorists and illegal immigrants from getting fake identification cards.

More than a dozen states have followed Maine's lead with resolutions or statutory prohibitions on Real ID.


I'm occasionally pleasantly surprised by my crazy state.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#2 Jun 06 2007 at 11:33 AM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Why do you hate Big Brother?
#3 Jun 06 2007 at 11:33 AM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts

Quote:
The program sets a national standard for driver's licenses and requires states to link their record-keeping systems to national databases.


I'm on the bandwagon when it comes to the goverment staying the fUck out of my business but could someone explain to me why this is bad?

Quote:
Opponents say it would create a national identity card system. Those cards would be valuable to identity thieves. Opponents also see the cards as an invasion of privacy.


...and don't use this as a reason. Regular State Driver's Licence/ ID cards can do the same thing and I fail to see how they can be any more of an invasion of privacy.
#4 Jun 06 2007 at 11:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Bad j00 j00
Avatar
***
2,159 posts
Not being of the US of A and not knowing anything about this other than what was in Nexa's post, I'm going to ask this question. Why would a national database be a bad thing?

A national standard at the very least wouldn't be a bad thing. Granted, I don't see how it would prevent terrorists and illegals from getting cards, either. *shrug*
#5 Jun 06 2007 at 11:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
I'm at work, but here's some good info.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#6 Jun 06 2007 at 11:58 AM Rating: Excellent
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Nizdaar wrote:
Why would a national database be a bad thing?
Fox News got their hands on the proposed dataset and found a field called "Last_seen_touching_self".

I think that explains everything.
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 256 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (256)