Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Gas prices reach all-time highFollow

#52 May 22 2007 at 1:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
I'll say it again. Higher gas prices have empiracally been shown not to have lessened driver's use of their vehicles.
Smiley: rolleyesSmiley: laugh

Technically, it was the Illinois' Regional Economics Applications Laboratory along with the Federal Reserve Bank who was speculating since it was their study. But it's not as though they'd know more then a helicopter pilot about the economy.

The point, my negro-envy suffering friend, is that higher fuel prices are reflected in consumer spending before they are reflected in a change in driving habits. Not even because of any "scare" but because of the simple fact that an extra $20 at the pump is one less lunch out or two less Shrek 187 tickets or, if you want to be overly maudlin, no more diapers and formula for poor starving children. And that $20 doesn't stay and stimulate the local economy like lunch and a movie does.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#53 May 22 2007 at 1:42 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
my negro-envy suffering friend
Awesome


As a budgeter, I'll be first to say that if your income isn't increasing and you've already projected your expenditures for the month, the extra money comes out of your "fun" money (assuming you want to keep your lights and gas on and a roof over your head), so it does affect your liesure activities. Maybe you don't see an impact in the economy right away, but you will come Christmas. Some folks (like myself) have bought the economy cars and left room in the budget, but I only have so much room to spare and so many changes I can make.
#54 May 22 2007 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
As a mere helicopter pilot then, I hate to be the one to break it to the Feds and that vaunted Illinois Regional Braintrust of Pencilnecked Geeks Towelsnapping Each Other in their Laboratory, but higher prices of gas have empiracally been shown not to have lessened driver's use of their vehicles.

Whether or not it leaves less money for Baby Jane to eat is debatable. As for the other expenditures that amount to pocket change, well, I guess Chicago's financial underpinnings are pretty fragile if disaster is imminent due to a few less movies being attended or Lotto tickets/smokes/chewing gum are not being purchased, because that's what the cost amounts to-- impulse buys at the cash register.

Totem

Edited, May 22nd 2007 5:47pm by Totem
#55 May 22 2007 at 1:44 PM Rating: Decent
****
6,318 posts
Wait.. I am confused.

I thought we were in a war for oil. That is what the sign on the side of the highway told me. Smiley: confused
#56 May 22 2007 at 1:44 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Don't make me go Mandingo on your a$$ and cause your relationship with Jo to suffer, Flea. I'll do it if you push me!

Totem
#57 May 22 2007 at 1:50 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Totem wrote:
As for the other expenditures that amount to pocket change
What, like karate lessons, grabbing lunch on the go, taking your kid to the fair and buying him a membership on a kid's site? Right there's about $80, which can hardly be called pocket change, and it's certainly making a dent in it if your weekly gas bill goes from $60 to $100. Multiply that by five and that's one karate teacher with no one signing up for class, local eateries seeing a slump in business, and one bored kid and irritated parents. Maybe manageable, but most people just "get by" as it is.

I'm sure this is where you intimate they should make use of their bootstraps.

Edited, May 22nd 2007 4:50pm by Atomicflea
#58 May 22 2007 at 1:51 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Totem wrote:
Don't make me go Mandingo on your a$$ and cause your relationship with Jo to suffer, Flea. I'll do it if you push me!
I fear early-middle-age wrinkling more than I fear you, Totes.
#59 May 22 2007 at 2:06 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
If your budget is so tight that your checkbook balance runs red because you paid an extra $20 at the pump, you have no business sending your kids to karate lessons. In fact, public transportation is something you should seriously consider.

In theory all this talk about how higher gas prices are hurting families ignores the reality of every day life. Most of the rest of the civilized world pays considerably more at the gas station than we do. Yet they manage to actually survive and live successful lives. How astounding. I dare say that a goodly number of these people who are crying out about paying more for gas could save a ton of money just by cutting off their cable bill and watching public TV-- and that's just a start.

I have lived in nearly every corner of this country and one thing remains constant: people want what they want. And right now what they want (and have wanted) are big SUVs and pickup trucks, which by some strange coincidence, seem to go hand-in-glove with poor gas mileage. And, I might add, cost well over $25,000. There is no economic crunch going on.

Totem
#60 May 22 2007 at 2:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
As a mere helicopter pilot then, I hate to be the one to break it to the Feds and that vaunted Illinois Regional Braintrust of Pencilnecked Geeks Towelsnapping Each Other in their Laboratory, but higher prices of gas have empiracally been shown not to have lessened driver's use of their vehicles.
That's not the point. That was never the point. I find it funny as hell that you can't grasp something so simple.
Quote:
If your budget is so tight that your checkbook balance runs red because you paid an extra $20 at the pump...
That's not neccessarily the point either. No matter how your budget is, if you're spending an extra $20 here, you are not spending it there. In this particular case, "there" is consumer spending which is, God willing, the first place people cut their budgets before deciding not to pay their mortgage, utility bills, etc.

Edited, May 22nd 2007 5:13pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#61 May 22 2007 at 2:13 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
big SUVs and pickup trucks, which by some strange coincidence, seem to go hand-in-glove with poor gas mileage.



I dunno what sort of helicopter you're flyin' Totem, but unless its a hybrid, your usin upwards of 150 litres of fuel per hour.

Would sorta negate any savings you're making on driving a Prius shopping car.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#62 May 22 2007 at 2:15 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Let me amend that last statement: there is no economic crunch going on that wasn't in place long before higher gas prices. Americans have been overextended on their credit for generations nad expect that they should not have to scrimp or squeeze on a budget so they can drive a large vehicle. No, they just demand gas prices be lower, regardless of the economic forces at play.

So to listen to how 30 cents more a gallon is killing our economy makes me laugh. Nevermind the unlimited cell phone plan with a phone for every member of the family, the cable bill complete with premium channels, fast food three time or more a day, the large car(s)/truck(s)/SUV(s) in the driveway, the scratch-off and Lotto tickets, Budweiser instead of Hamms, blah blah blahblah. So on and so forth.

Face it, we're rich. So rich that it's inconceivable to much of the world, and to hear how a small gas price increase is devastating local economies and hurting the American family is just so much crap.

Totem
#63 May 22 2007 at 2:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
killing our economy
No one made that argument. I understand though that if you can't diminish a facet or greatly exaggerate it then you aren't really capable of arguing it so it's okay.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#64 May 22 2007 at 2:21 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Quote:
Face it, we're rich. So rich that it's inconceivable to much of the world, and to hear how a small gas price increase is devastating local economies and hurting the American family is just so much crap.


/nod

Its true.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#65 May 22 2007 at 2:26 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
So yu're telling me then, Jo, that Mr. Karate Teacher should have that extra $20 instead of Shell or BP? How does that work? Are oil companies and their employees somehow less deserving of your money than him?

Yeah, I get your point-- you have no point. Which doesn't make for much of a discussion, which is why it was a good thing I deemed to grace this thread and give it some life, hence the large increase in posts once I showed up and gave this thread a focal point.

Look, you want to make the claim that a little more money being paid at the pump is going to make the economy crash, go ahead. Better yet, don't make that claim and go ahead and let the Feds and some lab in Illinois make the claim for you. It doesn't matter, because the American people haven't let a little price increase make that happen. However-- however, if or when it does occur and the market nosedives, people stop driving, and Chevron goes out of business, then you can personally call me and say "I told you so" with all your sky-is-falling predictions.

Wake me up when it does, ok?

Totem

Edited, May 22nd 2007 6:28pm by Totem
#66 May 22 2007 at 2:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
So yu're telling me then, Jo, that Mr. Karate Teacher should have that extra $20 instead of Shell or BP?
Nope, not as such.
Quote:
Yeah, I get your point-- you have no point.
None you can pick up on, anyway Smiley: laugh
Quote:
hence the large increase in posts once I showed up
People respond to dumb shit by Varrus as well. Don't break your spine sucking yourself off just yet.
Quote:
Look, you want to make the claim that a little more money being paid at the pump is going to make the economy crash, go ahead.
I didn't say that. I undersand though that ignoring this point makes your argument much less forceful and so it's easier to knock down strawmen.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#67 May 22 2007 at 2:36 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
"Don't break your spine sucking yourself off just yet." --Jo

You apparently have forgot that this negro envied poster has an Alabama Black Snake. Bending over isn't necesary, since it taps me on the nose in its' non-flaccid state. Yep, just another benefit to being dusky hued and well endowed.

Totem
#68 May 22 2007 at 2:41 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Bloomberg just announced that they're pushing to replace the entire NYC cab fleet with hybrids within the next 4 years. From the news bit I heard this would save $10,000 in gas each year. This doesn't sound too impressive to me, considering the, what, 13,000 cabs. How much do one of those Prius cost, anyways?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#69 May 22 2007 at 2:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Totem wrote:
Yep, just another benefit to being dusky hued and well endowed.
I guess when all else fails, you'll always have that joke to fall back on, huh?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#70 May 22 2007 at 2:54 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Smash, that is what is expected, but to date, outside of some grumbling consumers, spending has not been directly or indirectly tied or attributed to higher gas pricing.


Grumbling consumers drive the market. It's not my idea, but consumer confidence directly correlates to federal monetary policy.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#71 May 22 2007 at 2:56 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Hey, you go with what you know...
But please, continue on with that wondrous drip drip dripping sound that passes for a sense of humor there, Joph. I'm all slapping my knee and everything over here.

A new Prius in the People's Republik of Kalifornia is $21,000-28,0000 depending on the options packages.

Totem
#72 May 22 2007 at 3:01 PM Rating: Decent
**
304 posts
Totem wrote:
All this talk about gas prices is just so much whining. Curtail your Lotto ticket expenditures and the money you save will more than make up for the price of gasoline.


Totem said this at about mid-first page of this thread.

This quote acknowledges that the money that typically would be kept within the state (this is specific to the lotto example above) and local economies is now being exported elsewhere.

Also, mentioned are the $4 cafe latte mocha-chinos starbucks, the $10 movie tickets, the local restaurants, etc. All of these establishments will be affected locally. You said yourself that in order to deal with this crunch people need to curtail their expenditures on luxury items. This means that the $10 that would have other wise gone to Shrek tickets of to the cafe are no longer being spent their.

All of this means that, while not causing a financial collapse and an end to the free market system, gas prices are going to affect a local areas economies. It's unavoidable. With people not having the extra $10 a week to spend on product x, its going to affect local businesses. I think this was the point Jophiel was making.

Again, gas prices going up 30 cents a gallon will not cause financial chaos. Totem is right about that. But, to believe that a local economy will not be affected by the continuous exportation of capital, even a seemingly trivial amount to the fat, filthy American, is kinda stupid.
#73 May 22 2007 at 3:17 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Ok, for argument's sake let's say that that $20 does make a substantial difference. Based on that, is it any more valid to spend that cash on Shrek, thus enriching movie studios in California, or $3.75 on coffee, thus lining Starbucks pockets in Seattle, then some faceless oil company employee?

Even by that argument, Gary, Indiana is close enough that spending money on gas benefits those refineries you smell on I-80, many employees who likely live in or around the Chicago area.

Since when is a theater owner more deserving of a robust financial picture than the gas station owner on the corner? Money is money, and money spent at the Multiplex or the locaql gas station is still money that gets spent regardless.

If the cost of gas is awful, then get your state and Federal government to cut the tax on it. That'd reduce the price by half. You'd like that, wouldn't you?

Totem
#74 May 22 2007 at 3:27 PM Rating: Decent
Kaelesh wrote:
$3.29 as of this morning at the station down the block from me in Des Moines. I suppose over 10 billion in profit just isn't enough money.

Got me looking at a hybrid pretty intensely.

Edited, May 22nd 2007 8:39am by Kaelesh


i was looking at a hybrid, but ended up with a dodge cavalier. not 40MPG, but still i get 20MPG city and 30MPG highway with much larger storage capacity then any of the smaller cars that get between 5 - 10 MPG more.

getting rid of my Truck

at best it gets around 15MPG on the interstate. really powerful engine and the bed is 6.5ft. i have had it loaded up with well over 1k LBS and it does not even miss a bit when it drives with a heavy load in the bed. same goes for when towing. pulled a large trailer full of furniture for a friends not to long ago and even with the trailer overloaded the truck never was sluggish or hard to control. did have to increase time for breaking but that was only because the trailer did not have working breaks. with a good trailer i doubt i would of had to of made much of an adjustment at all other then not driving around corners as fast as i like to.
#75 May 22 2007 at 3:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Spankatorium Administratix
*****
1oooo posts
I was actually going to reply, but it's getting ridiculous now, so I thought I would at least add that. Smiley: grin
____________________________

#76 May 22 2007 at 4:54 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Dodge doesn't make Cavaliers, that's a Chevy model.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 286 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (286)