Omegavegeta wrote:
Quote:
The Iraq war will be see for being "great foresight", allowing a forward base of operations to take on Iran, rather than a war that could have waited another year or so, while new information was obtained, where it could have been discovered that a nuclear program was at best, a wet dream for Saddam, and that all he could "muster" was chemical.
Selling the Iraqi war as "great forsight allowing a forward base of operations to take on Iran" wouldn't have worked either.
He sold the war using WMDs, which didn't exist, got us stuck in Iraq, and will leave office with us still stuck there.
Hell of a legacy.
I quoted it all, and will add this for you:
Quote:
Link "We have found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, chemical weapons," Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., said in a quickly called press conference late Wednesday afternoon.
Taken from this report: http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/Iraq_WMD_Declassified.pdf
Now, we've found chemical weapons of mass distruction, so...your argument again was? Oh wait, there were no WMDs, that was it. Stop blabbering the same useless bull
Shit as the rest of the ignorant masses. We didn't find nukes. THAT was the major part of what we were sold. THAT's what we haven't found. At least be honest.
Now, to clarify something that you didn't get: My comments on Iraq being "great foresight" were sarcasm. The lack of planning astounds me. I'm flummoxed that ANYONE in a position of power in the Pentagon allowed something like this to happen. The only person that I can recall attempting to stop it was Powell, and he was dismissed for being a darkie, rather than one of the men that brought Iraq to it's knees once before. Had there been a real plan we wouldn't have half the problems that we have now. We should have taken the majority of combat forces out of Iraq after disposing of Saddam. Rebuilding the country wasn't our problem to begin with, and shouldn't have been factored into the victory.
I do believe that Iraq isn't going to be the greatest legacy of W. Iraq will be "won" before we leave. It will be as stable as most countries in the ME within a few years. Well, that's my opinion anyway. I'm basing that on two years of world history classes, and studying countries postwar. A similar trend of "crisis" persists for a couple of years afterword. Usually resolved when the majority gains the political power they request.
Then again, what will it matter with the world "ending" on December 21, 2012 anyway?