Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

A bastion of liberalisms solution for gun violenceFollow

#1 May 17 2007 at 8:29 AM Rating: Sub-Default
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070517/ap_on_re_us/lockdown_zones_1

Quote:
Under Curran's plan, the mayor could declare "public safety act zones," which would allow police to close liquor stores and bars, limit the number of people on city sidewalks, and halt traffic during two-week intervals.

Police would be encouraged to aggressively stop and frisk individuals in those zones to search for weapons and drugs.


Varus
#2 May 17 2007 at 8:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
You're really reaching now, aren't you?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#3 May 17 2007 at 8:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
If everyone in Baltimore had a gun, there wouldn't be any more violence!

I'm all for this plan, but it doesn't go far enough. I think these zones should be cordoned off with razor wire and the police replaced with members of the armed forces. Also, we should look into buying some of these.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4REDACTED, Posted: May 17 2007 at 8:49 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#5 May 17 2007 at 9:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Know what else would help? If we could pass a law requiring everyone to wear some sort of marking signifying their socio-economic status so we'd know who the dangerous ones were.

Well, I suppose if we marked all the bad ones, we would really need for the upper class people to wear anything.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#6 May 17 2007 at 9:09 AM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
I'm against any law that allows upper crust socialite public nakedness.
____________________________
Do what now?
#7 May 17 2007 at 9:10 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Why not just confine all the dangerous/poor/ugly ones to a certain area, like Montana? That way, the decent, God fearing rich folk can go on with life unmolested.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#8 May 17 2007 at 9:11 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Actually, this wasn't a bad idea at all!
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#9 May 17 2007 at 10:41 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Know what else would help? If we could pass a law requiring everyone to wear some sort of marking signifying their socio-economic status so we'd know who the dangerous ones were.

Oh come off it, they already are marked, by the color of their skin. If it ain't white it ain't right.

Besides, from all appearances I was under the impression that everyone in Baltimore already was heavily armed...
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#10 May 17 2007 at 10:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
Debalic wrote:
Besides, from all appearances I was under the impression that everyone in Baltimore already was heavily armed...

Sssshhh, I'm not, but don't tell anybody
____________________________
Do what now?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 355 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (355)