a crime was committed. it just cant be proven.
what they did was find a way to circumvent the confirmation process in the senate by adding wording into the war bill, giving the executive brance the authority to appoint temporary, as in there untill the addministraition leaves office, attorneys while the congress was out for recess.
then they waited untill right before that recess and fired them, so congress would not be in session when they appointed the replacements.
if these events were just coincedental, there is no crime, just bad timing.
if they were, however, intentionally orgistraited for the sole purpose of appointing addministraition friendly attorneys without a mandated senate confermation......
not only would that be illegal, it would fall under the rico act, be an outright act of subversion against this country, and borderline treason.
every one knows it was intentional. every one knows a serious crime has been committed.
every one knows it can not be proven unless someone spills the beans, thus, the uinvestigation.
yes, a crime was committed. just like the torture issue. just cant prove it. but then, bush went to war without any proof, so mabe we should follow suit and hang him now and look for evidance later..........