Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Weighing in on the Mommy WarsFollow

#1 May 03 2007 at 6:20 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
While I normally don't watch tv, every once in awhile there is one talk show I will DVR if the topic is something I am interested in. The other day they did a stint on the Mommy Wars. I'm pretty neutral on all matters of this "war", but while watching it, I was appalled at how angry and hateful some of the wimmins acted towards those with different opinions. One mother in particular was straight up yelling that any mother who decided to be a full time mom was lazy. Ironically, Sickabilly sent me this article
that day.

So mothers, fathers, people who have an opinion, here's a couple of topics to weigh in on. What's your stance? What's your thoughts on the other stance? Do you look down on those who have differing ideals when it comes to child raising? Would you openly criticize someone in public? Im not talking abuse here. Just different ways of parenting:

1. Career Mom vs Stay at Home Mom

2. Breast or Bottle (keep in mind kids need to eat in public too, when answering)

3. To Spank, or Not To Spank

4. Organic only Foods? Fast Food OK?




Also, for you moms and dads out there, have you ever been stopped and criticized for something you were doing with your children on any of these matters? How did you react?



My own thoughts:

1. I've done both. Each had it's pros and cons. I know that as soon as my kids are in school I will be reentering the work force. But for myself, I look at it this way. I've been given an amazing opportunity that many families can not afford, being able to stay home with my two kids during their younger years and I will take full advantage of it. Being able to raise my kids without the need of daycare is precious. I get to be a constant part of their life. And these years go by swiftly, never to return. Do I look down on moms who can't, or don't wish to? Hell no. I doff my hat at them and wish them the best.

2. Either one feeds the child. I was bottle fed and I'd like to think I came out ok. I personally nursed my kids and while it is absolutely natural, it is by no means instinctive and easy in the beginning. Many times I thought of switching, and did so for my first when I went back to work after 3 months. I'm fortunate again for myself in that this time around I dont have to worry about returning to work and trying to finagle in time to pump there. Also, my second is allergic to milk and soy and the only formula he can have is insanely expensive. Also, he refuses to drink the formula that costs 3 bars of gold.

3. Only in extreme emergencies, i.e. your 4 year old is reaching for a piping hot potato out of the microwave and is refusing to listen to your panicked screams to stop. A light swat > a trip to the ER with burns.

4. Like I have time to make my own baby food from organically grown fruits and veggies Smiley: rolleyes I don't mind stopping once in awhile for chicken nuggets, and Im fortunate my older son prefers the yogurt/apples/oranges to french fry sides. I'm also fortunate that my older son loves fruits and veggies. The only vegetable he has an issue with right now is asperagus. Sad, cause that's one of my faves. So, in moderation, I see nothing wrong with fast food.

AFK for awhile as I take my son to his swim class, but hopefully I'll have a couple minutes here and there today to check for responses. This whole Mommy War has intrigued and disgusted me, not so much the differing opinions, but the vehemence that so many people use when trying to convey that their way is the only way and everyone else is a horrible person.
#2 May 03 2007 at 6:34 AM Rating: Decent
Well, since I have opinions I'll venture into Allafemme territory, albeit slightly hesitantly.

1) My mum was a career mum, and my dad was a career dad, and they were divorced. I remember staying home after school with a "nanny", until my mum came home at 8 or 9 in the evening. It was not great, but then she was a single mum, and didn't have much choice. It never bothered me, really, and I turned out just fine!

No, really!

Well ok, maybe not "just fine", but I turned out "ok". So both are fine with me, you gotta do what you gotta do.

2) Breast is obviously better, I think, but bottle is ok when breasting is not practical.

3) I'm against spanking though I agree with DSD about exceptions.

4) Now this is different. Unless you're dirt poor and can't afford anything else, giving crap food to your kid is criminal. It'll hurt them for th rest of their lives. Fat food, fast food, Coke, junk food, processed crap, all of this is awful It'll hurt them physically, and mentally. Not only that, but badly developped taste buds means that they'll eat crap when they grow up.

Food is incredibly important when you're growing. And the younger the kid, the more important it is. I erally think every effort should be made to feed your kid healthy, organice, products, with a specail emphasis on Vegs.

Yes, it's an uphill struggle, but it's so worth it.

Having said all this, I would never castigate a mum that had to work, or couldn't afford good food, cos it's a fUcking hard job. But if you can feed them well, you should make every effort to do so, at every possible opportunity. If anyone saw what went in those chicken nuggets or fast food, they would never feed it to themselves, let alone their kid.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#3 May 03 2007 at 6:40 AM Rating: Excellent
*
244 posts
Danalog and I have started to talk about this because we are thinking of trying for kids after we make the Seattle move. So here's my bit:

1. I want to stay at home in the beginning, for the first year or so, because I have this great fear of day cares. I worked at one, and I know how bad the teachers can mess up your child morally and mentally. Plus when you leave a baby in day care (at least the one I worked for - even though I was working with elementary and middle schoolers) the only time they are touched or held is when they need fed or changed. I don't want my baby to go untouched. My parents apparently always held/hugged/cuddled me when I was a baby, and I was apparently very content all through my childhood. After the first year or so though, Danalog can do his work (from home still) and take care of the critter.

2. This one really depends on if you are able to breast feed or not. When my sister had her son, she just didn't produce milk much at all, so even though she wanted to breast feed, she couldn't. Assuming my mammories are working normally, I want to breast feed. And I won't just whip it out in public, that's what blankets are for. When breast feeding, the child bonds with its mother, learns her scent when it is a newborn, and if I have the milk there, why not put it to good use?

3. I was spanked very rarely as a child, but when I have children, I think spanking is out. There are other and far more creative ways of punishment than just resorting to spanking.

4. I'm going organic-only when I am preggers, just because I don't want all that funky stuff going to my baby (hormones in beef and antibiotics in chicken, etc.).
When they are little I will probably stick mostly to organic food just because we love organic food. And there are plenty of kid-friendly organic brands (Annie's to name one). Doesn't mean that my kids are never going to go to Checker's or Chipotle. Just not McD's.
#4 May 03 2007 at 6:43 AM Rating: Good
Not that I have children yet, but:

1. I think this is really all situational, I mean if the mum is out 'careering' is the dad there or not?

2. Same as Redphoenixxx on this one, Breast is better but bottle if Breast isn't an option.

3. I dunno, it depends how bad the kids are being, I got a clip round the ear or a palm to the backs of the legs if I back chatted my parents or anything like that, but other than that I was pretty much too scared of them to do anything really bad. I would probably try to instill fear into the children to remind them that are consequences for being bad, but also show them that there are rewards to being good.

4. Organic stuff is pretty bloody expensive, but fast food is pretty terrible for the kids health so neither really, heh.

I wouldn't ever criticise another parent for something they were doing, but then I would probably go bat **** crazy at someone who criticised me.
#5 May 03 2007 at 6:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Code Monkey
Avatar
****
7,476 posts
I do agree with the "Imminent Danger" spanking clause though.
____________________________
Do what now?
#6 May 03 2007 at 6:50 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
DSD wrote:

1. Career Mom vs Stay at Home Mom

2. Breast or Bottle (keep in mind kids need to eat in public too, when answering)

3. To Spank, or Not To Spank

4. Organic only Foods? Fast Food OK?




1. Either, whatever works best for your family. As long as the child has plenty of personal attention, educational activities, love, etc, I think they're both fine. I am also continually irritated at the assumption that it would be the mom who stays home with the kids, instead of it being a "kid at home with parent vs. caretaker" situation.

2. I am assuming by bottle you mean formula...if I'm wrong, well then correct me. Breast milk has many benefits that formula still can't seem to duplicate, therefore I chose to breastfeed. I also liked to pump into a bottle so that her dad could take a turn at feeding her. When I went back to work when she was 10 weeks old, I pumped at work and her dad stayed home with her. She was exclusively breastmilk fed until 6 months, then solid foods were introduced and we continued to feed her with breastmilk until she was a year old.

3. I'm not getting into another long debate about spanking...can we just link the other thread here, it can't have been more than a month ago?

4. Everything in moderation. I don't mind the (very) occasional fast food...sometimes it's required for sanity, however, the obvious choice for nutrition would be...well, nutritious foods. Those are in short supply at fast food chains (and are also prohibitively expensive). With the rate of increase in childhood obesity in the US especially, I am very concious of my daughter's caloric intake. She has a cute little baby belly now, but I don't want that turning into a not-so-cute adolescent belly, and I'm sure she wouldn't thank me for it.

As far as being critisized, no, though I've gotten a few irritated looks at my breastfeeding in public, but that's just too damn bad. What I find more annoying are the overly-concerned glances and questions from strangers regarding Hannah's newest bump, bruise, or scratch. "Oh no, what happened to her head?" I just want to tell them that I hit her with an iron but now she knows better than to touch my crack pipe.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#7 May 03 2007 at 7:00 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
1. Career Mom vs Stay at Home Mom

I am a SAHM and I am thankful for it. I'll be back to work in 5 years or so.

2. Breast or Bottle

Breast, in my case. I hardly ever nurse in public. I plan to be home for feedings. I don't give a crap if other mommies want to bottle feed. People should mind their own business.

3. To Spank, or Not To Spank

I personally don't spank but I've been close, I can tell you that. The terrible twos earned a reputation for good reason. Smiley: wink

4. Organic only Foods? Fast Food OK?

I don't generally buy organic food, though I did buy jarred organic baby food. Mia gets McDs about once a week, after we go to Gymboree. It's a treat for both of us. She doesn't eat a lot of food anyway.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#8 May 03 2007 at 7:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Bad j00 j00
Avatar
***
2,159 posts
While I'm not a parent and won't be for a while the whole Mommy War thing is a bit over the top. Let's face it, the talk shows look for this sort of person to be on them. Everything in moderation is good. My Mom was a stay at home Mommy. She was anything but lazy. She was always cooking, cleaning or doing something else. She always involved myself or my lil sis whenever possible. Sometimes it sucked, but it's how I began to learn how to cook and stuff like that.

The odd swat the the behind when the kid is really bad or to the wrist when going for a hot potato is good. I'd rather give the kid a small sting than a burn.

I'm really not a fan of fast food to begin with, so I'm biased. It's neither cheap nor good for you. It's rare that if I'm getting something on the go it's not from Subway or Quizno's or something like that. To fill me up with burgers just ends up costing more than a footlong.
#9 May 03 2007 at 7:15 AM Rating: Good
1. Career Mom vs Stay at Home Mom

2. Breast or Bottle (keep in mind kids need to eat in public too, when answering)

3. To Spank, or Not To Spank

4. Organic only Foods? Fast Food OK?



1. Stay at home. I'd be a stay at home dad if money were no object. My wife and I both agree that it's better to raise your kids yourself with your own values rather than sending them off to daycare to let society raise them. We spend as much time as humanly possible with our kids.

2. Breast for at least the first 6-9 months. So many health and developmental implications. I couldn't care less about what society thinks or does not think (re:public).

3. I've learned a lot from raising 4 kids. All I can say is threatening spankings for hurting another person seems to work well. I've rarely ever had to follow through. Beyond this time-outs and taking away things the child likes (grounding) works well. Things change at the teen years though.

4. Everything in moderation.
#10 May 03 2007 at 7:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
1. Career Mom vs Stay at Home Mom
Neither. They should have a nanny watch the child while they hit the gym and salon, making themselves pretty for me.

2. Breast or Bottle (keep in mind kids need to eat in public too, when answering)
You can't buy a breast of gin to keep the kid quiet after 5:30pm.

3. To Spank, or Not To Spank
A sound thrashing with a length of chain will encourge your tyke to finish his gin.

4. Organic only Foods? Fast Food OK?
What he can glean from the yard, he can keep.

By in large, I don't care how you're raising your child within the standard ranges on both ends.

Edited, May 3rd 2007 10:17am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 May 03 2007 at 7:23 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
I sent that article you linked to Mr. Ambrya, because just a few weeks ago, we were having a discussion in which he was trying to attach a dollar figure to the value of a "homemaker" type situation, which rolls the duties of daycare, chauffeur service, housekeeping, and personal chef all in one. I don't remember the figure he came up with, but I think it was well over $100,000, so I think he'll enjoy the article.

I think a lot of the "mommy wars" is media hype, with talk shows and magazine articles deliberately trying to create an "either-or" conflict, but yeah, sometimes there are some who get pretty self-righteous about their choices. It's sometimes hard not to fall into that trap, because sometimes you find yourself in a position where you are (happily) sacrificing something or going the extra mile to do something you know will be better for your child, and then you encounter someone who never even tried, sometimes because they just felt it was more trouble than they were willing to go to.

I WANT women to have choices. The more choices, the better. But what's more, I want them to be EDUCATED about their choices before they make them, and what tends to bother me isn't when women make different choices, it's when it becomes apparent they never bothered to get all the facts before making those choices. This means, for example, KNOWING the potential health drawbacks of formula-feeding before choosing not to breastfeed. I also feel parenting does call for a lot of sacrifice, and find myself troubled when I encounter people who behave as though it doesn't, and make their choices accordingly, based not upon what is best for their child, but what is most expedient/convenient for themselves.

I wouldn't criticize someone's choices aloud, but I might secretely roll my eyes a bit from time.

1) If I had my 'druthers, I'd be a stay at home mom. I've just known too many people who did everything right as far as checking out the credentials and operation of their chosen daycare venue and ended up with their kids in neglectful and/or abusive situations anyway. This really isn't an option, however--we're barely treading water financially. I have to complete my education and get back into the workforce. If I'd gotten into my school of choice this year, it actually would have been pretty nice, as the school has a policy of allowing new moms to bring their babies up to 4 months of age, and will allow daycare providers to bring the baby to campus during breaks for breastfeeding moms. As it is, it's probably worked out better that I didn't get in this year--now I'll have until next spring to be with the baby, school will only keep me out of the house a few days a week, and my mother-in-law will be doing daycare, for free.

I understand some people just can't afford to not work (though I think sometimes, if people did the math, they would realize they are actually paying more for daycare and gas than they end up making), and that some people are so invested in their careers they don't want to give it up, and I respect that. But in one memorable incidence, I encountered a woman who said she HAD to work full time because she couldn't stand being around her kids that much of the time, and that bothered me. If you dislike your children so much that you have to spend a full third or more of the day away from them, there's something seriously wrong with your family dynamic. Work should not be something you use to run away from your kids.


2) I'll admit it, I'm a bit of a boob ****. I think we should encourage everyone to at least try breastfeeding, and not with the half-hearted lip-service we presently pay toward it, but truly equip women with the tools they need to succeed. Most women who try breastfeeding and say it didn't work (it was too painful, she didn't have enough milk, etc) if you investigate their stories, you will find that they were 1) given bad advice by care providers and the people around them, and 2) had insufficient support/resources for handling difficulties.

True, formula is not rat poison, most of us here were probably raised on it and survived okay. But then--just because someone survived something doesn't mean it's necessarily the optimal option. There are child-rearing books from the 60s and 70s that suggest putting babies in a laundry basket with a pillow in it for trips in the car. Most of us as babies were probably carried in our parents' laps in the car, unbuckled. Just because we survived our childhoods without car seats and seat belts, should we forego those for our own children?

I recognize that breastfeeding isn't for everyone--some people can't swing it physically (rare, but it happens) and others get bad advice/poor support that leads to insufficient milk production and necessitates formula supplementation. I only find myself doing the ::headdesk:: at people who don't even try or even consider trying, the ones who excuse their choice by calling it "icky" or screeching, "I'm not a cow!" which, while it may justify their personal choice, is frankly offensive to anyone who chooses differently.

I do believe that if more people were educated about the health benefits to both mother and baby, and saw breastfeeding as the cultural norm rather than something to be hidden away behind locked doors in dark rooms that it has become in our puritanical society, more people would choose to breastfeed. I think most of the ones who don't simply aren't all that well educated about it.


3) As I've said before, I don't think the occasional swat as a deterent in extreme situations is going to do any damage. If you're having to threaten your kid with physical violence for any infraction, however, you're doing something wrong, and it's become an ineffective tool.


4) I'm making the switch to organic dairy because I really don't want my kids going through puberty at age 8, thankyouverymuch. I try to stick with free-range, hormone-free meats and products when possible, but finances are a consideration. If we drank more than 2-3 gallons of milk a month, we probably couldn't afford organic milk at $6 a gallon.

The occasional french fry won't kill the kids, but I'd rather they see it as a rare treat and not a daily dietary staple.

#12 May 03 2007 at 7:45 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Those "How much are moms worth?" articles are crap fluff. You can't reasonably extrapolate that since a luxury service such as "personal chef" or "chauffer" charges a set amount, that anyone who cooks a hotdog or drives a minivan is worth the same amount.

When Jophiel Jr. was still in all-day private daycare, the woman who watched him was, for all intents and purposes, his mother for eight hours a day. Cooked, cleaned the house, changed his clothes if he came inside from the yard covered in mud, etc. She charged me $150 a week for it which was about average for in-home daycare.

$150 divided by five days a week is $30 per eight hour period.
$30 x 3 periods = $90 a day
$90 x 7 days = $630 a week
$630 x 52 weeks = $32,760 annually

I could accept an argument that it's over thirty-two grand, but not by a hundred grand. What's a live-in nanny make annually? I'm guessing not $135k+ or else I'm in the wrong business.

Edited, May 3rd 2007 10:46am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#13 May 03 2007 at 7:47 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Jophiel wrote:
A sound thrashing with a length of chain will encourge your tyke to finish his gin.


Smiley: laugh
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#14 May 03 2007 at 8:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
I encountered a woman who said she HAD to work full time because she couldn't stand being around her kids that much of the time, and that bothered me.


Yeah, that one gets me too. Why have the little buggers if you can't stand to be around them? And if you can't stand the first one, then ffs why have more?

A friend of mine's mother runs a day care. One mom in particular drops her kids off at off hours, weekends, etc. just because "she needs a break from them". Good heavens, she already has all day every day away from them, what more does she need? (This is a suburban non-working mom, by the way. I guess it's good her kids are in a stable environment away from her as much as they are.)
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#15 May 03 2007 at 10:23 AM Rating: Good
*****
14,454 posts
Quote:
A friend of mine's mother runs a day care. One mom in particular drops her kids off at off hours, weekends, etc. just because "she needs a break from them".


Now, I do this, but not to a day care. A couple times a week when my husband gets home, I'll pop out for a breather, and either go out to run some errands without the kids with me, or just drive around and recharge my batteries. Not for long, usually 30 minutes or so. But for myself, it has been an amazing way to clear my head and not get bogged down with the tantrums of the day, remembering that this too shall pass (if its been a bad day). It also helps me reconnect with myself. I'm Mommy 24/7 and Wife, but sometimes I need to be just "me". Plus its the only time I can turn the volume up to my favorite music without having to worry about lil ear drums popping Smiley: wink

By the time I get home, I'm a much more relaxed person and ready to face anything. My kids also benefit by having some solo time with dad, which they dont get often enough since hes been working long hours lately
#16 May 03 2007 at 10:29 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
DSD wrote:
Quote:
A friend of mine's mother runs a day care. One mom in particular drops her kids off at off hours, weekends, etc. just because "she needs a break from them".


Now, I do this, but not to a day care. A couple times a week when my husband gets home, I'll pop out for a breather, and either go out to run some errands without the kids with me, or just drive around and recharge my batteries. Not for long, usually 30 minutes or so. But for myself, it has been an amazing way to clear my head and not get bogged down with the tantrums of the day, remembering that this too shall pass (if its been a bad day). It also helps me reconnect with myself. I'm Mommy 24/7 and Wife, but sometimes I need to be just "me". Plus its the only time I can turn the volume up to my favorite music without having to worry about lil ear drums popping Smiley: wink

By the time I get home, I'm a much more relaxed person and ready to face anything. My kids also benefit by having some solo time with dad, which they dont get often enough since hes been working long hours lately


Ditto, except I plan to fit in some Mommy-time and never actually do it, making me even more bitter. Yay!

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#17 May 03 2007 at 10:43 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Those "How much are moms worth?" articles are crap fluff. You can't reasonably extrapolate that since a luxury service such as "personal chef" or "chauffer" charges a set amount, that anyone who cooks a hotdog or drives a minivan is worth the same amount.

When Jophiel Jr. was still in all-day private daycare, the woman who watched him was, for all intents and purposes, his mother for eight hours a day. Cooked, cleaned the house, changed his clothes if he came inside from the yard covered in mud, etc. She charged me $150 a week for it which was about average for in-home daycare.

$150 divided by five days a week is $30 per eight hour period.
$30 x 3 periods = $90 a day
$90 x 7 days = $630 a week
$630 x 52 weeks = $32,760 annually

I could accept an argument that it's over thirty-two grand, but not by a hundred grand. What's a live-in nanny make annually? I'm guessing not $135k+ or else I'm in the wrong business.

Edited, May 3rd 2007 10:46am by Jophiel
This merely points out the fact that day-care workers, teachers and nurturers in general are seriously underpaid.

Though I agree that putting a dollar amount to the worth of a mother (stay at home or otherwise) is ludicruous. Distinguishing in dollar amounts between 'stay-at-home' moms and 'working' moms is even more ridiculous. Do the people writing these articles suggest that because a mom has to go work during the day that they then do not do the laundry, cook the dinner, help with the homework, coach the little league team, etc, etc..

Wonder if a stay at home Dad is worth more than a stay-at home mom???
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#18 May 03 2007 at 10:51 AM Rating: Decent
*****
10,755 posts
Stay at home. No substitute unless a caring grandparent can be found.

Whichever the baby will take. Probably a bit of both.

Hell yes to spank. Put the fear of seeing God into them. How the f*uck are you going to reason with a 4 yr old?

Organic only? Pshaw. Fast food is the debil, but even worse is teaching him/er to be a hippie liberal pussy

Edited, May 3rd 2007 2:51pm by NephthysWanderer
#19 May 03 2007 at 11:00 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
1. Career Mom vs Stay at Home Mom
Apparently, Joph's financing a nanny so I can stay out and make myself pretty all day. Smiley: grin Ideally, I'd go back to work as soon as I was able. Warm fuzzies aside, kids cost money.

2. Breast or Bottle (keep in mind kids need to eat in public too, when answering)If I'm sleeping and you need to keep the bugger quiet, sure, use my boob, but don't wake me. Smiley: mad In public, I'd prefer pumped breast milk. I don't think I'll ever be comfortable with pulling out my mammaries at Nordstrom.

3. To Spank, or Not To Spank
That's the kid's decision more than mine. If you're gonna be a little bastage, you take whatcha got comin' to ya.

4. Organic only Foods? Fast Food OK?
Depends on whether or not I feel like cooking.
#20 May 03 2007 at 11:03 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Samira wrote:
Quote:
I encountered a woman who said she HAD to work full time because she couldn't stand being around her kids that much of the time, and that bothered me.


Yeah, that one gets me too. Why have the little buggers if you can't stand to be around them? And if you can't stand the first one, then ffs why have more?
Smiley: lol Listen, you love your parents, your boyfriend, your kids, but you can't take any of them 24/7. Everyone needs me-time. That need doesn't magically disappear when you pop out a couple. If anything, being the go-to gal for an entire household level ups the stress in a way work never can, because it's constant, and it will be for the rest of your life. You know this before, but you don't really know it till you're in it.
#21 May 03 2007 at 11:05 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elinda wrote:
This merely points out the fact that day-care workers, teachers and nurturers in general are seriously underpaid.
I disagree, at least on the part of in-home daycare workers. Educators are a separate field entirely for a bunch of reasons. But simply tending, even lovingly, to children isn't exactly a skilled labor market; people have been doing it successfully for over ten thousand years.

Edited, May 3rd 2007 2:11pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#22 May 03 2007 at 11:21 AM Rating: Decent
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Elinda wrote:
This merely points out the fact that day-care workers, teachers and nurturers in general are seriously underpaid.
I disagree, at least on the part of in-home daycare workers. Educators are a separate field entirely for a bunch of reasons. But simply tending, even lovingly, to children isn't exactly a skilled labor market; people have been doing it successfully for over ten thousand years.

Edited, May 3rd 2007 2:11pm by Jophiel
People have been teaching successfully for thousands or years too.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#23 May 03 2007 at 11:22 AM Rating: Good
DSD wrote:

1. Career Mom vs Stay at Home Mom


Honestly, I'd leave it up to the mother. I personally have no problem with going either direction AS LONG AS there is proper supervision and care for the child if the mother is at work.

For me, if money isn't a problem, I'd be a stay-at-home father. I only get to see my kids grow up once.

DSD wrote:
2. Breast or Bottle (keep in mind kids need to eat in public too, when answering)


Breastfeeding.

I feel like that breastfeeding establishes a connection between the baby and the mother early on, not to mention that according to this study, breastmilk is the best source of nurishment for babies.

In public...I'd still say breastfeeding. Just don't have to do it openly or anything.

DSD wrote:
3. To Spank, or Not To Spank


Imminent danger preferably only.

I don't like hurting people in general, but I do believe that a spanking should get the message across when the situation is important enough to warrant it.

DSD wrote:
4. Organic only Foods? Fast Food OK?


Nearly all of the meals should be cooked and be healthy. But honestly, I don't see anything wrong with going to McDonalds once in awhile. The thing is to not depend on fast food for the child's main nourishment.
____________________________
Proud citizen of Miranda.

-Currently on Pochacco Server of Hello Kitty Online.
#24 May 03 2007 at 11:31 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
DSD wrote:
Quote:
A friend of mine's mother runs a day care. One mom in particular drops her kids off at off hours, weekends, etc. just because "she needs a break from them".


Now, I do this, but not to a day care. A couple times a week when my husband gets home, I'll pop out for a breather, and either go out to run some errands without the kids with me, or just drive around and recharge my batteries. Not for long, usually 30 minutes or so. But for myself, it has been an amazing way to clear my head and not get bogged down with the tantrums of the day, remembering that this too shall pass (if its been a bad day). It also helps me reconnect with myself. I'm Mommy 24/7 and Wife, but sometimes I need to be just "me". Plus its the only time I can turn the volume up to my favorite music without having to worry about lil ear drums popping Smiley: wink

By the time I get home, I'm a much more relaxed person and ready to face anything. My kids also benefit by having some solo time with dad, which they dont get often enough since hes been working long hours lately


Right; but bear in mind, her kids are in the day care seven hours a day, five days a week already. Unlike you, she hasn't spent all day every day talking to toddlers and/or infants.

Edit: I just realized that last comment could be taken as a snipe, and wanted to clarify that I didn't mean it that way at all. Unlike you, she has not dedicated herself to her kids selflessly all day. She just doesn't seem to want to be around them at all, ever.

Edited, May 3rd 2007 3:34pm by Samira
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#25 May 03 2007 at 11:40 AM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
1. Kids need time with Mommy, but Mommy needs her own time. No issues with working parents (I was the stay-at-home Dad while Noblet was ickle). Some folks just have to work. No biggy to me.

2. Breast. The obvious benefits to breastfeeding don't need repeating, but I think the 2 main hurdles are poor support for new Moms and some stupid stigma about public breastfeeding. When new Moms do get advice it's often biased, and those that need advice and moral support if they try get it all to rarely.
Some may take an informed decision to bottle feed. 's OK. Some simply can't.


3. Some parents abuse their kids with cigarette ends and knives. They are evil bastages and provide no argument against a decisive and measured smack to the bum or hand. Meanwhile, back in the real world (Terrible 2's etc), most parents live with the guilt of having delivered a smack delivered in temper. Shit happens.

4. All been said. Fast Food as an occasional 'treat', sure, but what pisses me off is that good wholesome food can take less time and money than a trip to McKentucky King
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#26 May 03 2007 at 11:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Elinda wrote:
People have been teaching successfully for thousands or years too.
And?

If that's your best argument to connect two separate fields and say that daycare workers are woefully underpaid then I'm afraid you lost me.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 361 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (361)