Debalic wrote:
Actually, that's pretty much exactly what a "stream of consciousness" assignment is. How many creative writing courses have you taken?
I've taken several in fact. The point is that "good" stream of consciousness writing allows the writer to pass from one stream to another without losing the audience and in a way that "flows". There should also be some underlying point or message in the writing. Random words and thoughts for the sake of random words and thoughts is *not* stream of consciousness. It's random words and thoughts.
It's still a technique for communicating (even the most obtuse poetry is "bad" if no one gets anything out of it). You should never get so caught up in the technique itself that you forget that there's still supposed to be a "point" to the words. The reader is supposed to get something out of reading it other then "gee, this guy was all over the place and is a nutball".
His writing was a poor example of the technique at best.
Quote:
Now, I'm not saying that standards *haven't* dropped in today's visual-medium-based society, so that movies and videogames are in the forefront of every young person's mind.
Yeah. I chaulk that up to modern culture I suppose. When I was a kid we mostly read stuff and formed our views of the world based on what we read. Music and TV existed but was entertainment. Today's kids seem to be forming their basic ideas of the world around them on what they see an hear on the TV, radio, and internet.
I'm not so much surprised at the quality of the essay, but that this was from someone described as a "straight A student". I wasn't expecting classical themes and deep thoughts, but maybe something somewhere approaching those things?...