I love how you guys keep trying to turn the discussion around like I am somehow trying to justify my position for my own sake. There is no vendetta here, deal with it.
Celcio, you seem to still be missing the point. If choice is indeed the differentiating factor, then what that says about our culture is that we are still very unaccepting of diversity... that we only accept or tolerate differences when the person has no choice, not based on the actual effect of those differences.
I've yet to see a compelling argument as to why that's a part of our culture that we should readily embrace.
Quote:
It has nothing to do with being capable of fulfilling the role, but rather being accepted in that role.
You're talking about what is. I'm talking about what should be. You might think I'm just being a naive idealist, and that's fine. I acknowledge the reality, while at the same time evaluate the theoretical ideality, and look at ways to bridge the gap between reality and ideality. That is how progress is made.
Unless you can explain to me how it is somehow a cultural inevitability, but in which case you might make the same case for other forms of discrimination, and I might not disagree with you.
Believe it or not, I'm really not firmly set on my position. I came here more to be convinced than to convince others, I just have yet to see an ethical justification for discriminating based on dress other than things along the lines of, "that's the way it is and has been for a long time." Antagonizing me isn't really necessary either, as much fun as I'm sure it is.