Ok, so it's not news to anyone that a lot of people judge others based on how they dress, wear their hair, tattoos and piercings, etc., but it seems like something we really don't address.
In many industries, wearing a suit is simply part of being a "professional." Does wearing a suit actually improve your ability to do your job? Probably only for the reason that others will judge you based on your appearance. You might be uncomfortable in a suit and work much better in a T-shirt and shorts, but that just doesn't send the image your employers are trying to create.
You sure as hell wouldn't walk into the average job interview with pants sagging, a wifebeater and a doorag, and you probably wouldn't hire someone that did, but what if that's everyday attire for that person? Does it then become cultural or racial discrimination... is the attire acceptable as long as it doesn't hinder the person from doing their job? Or are uniformity/professionalism legitimate excuses for discriminating based on fashion?
Earlier I was discussing the issue of school uniforms with some colleagues. Some people think that school uniforms reduce disciplinary problems in schools, partially because of the way it desegregates students and makes them less apt to make judgments of eachother based on dress. Makes sense enough, but is that really the message we need to be sending? Kind of goes back to that argument of cultural melting pot vs. cultural salad bowl. I myself wonder if school uniforms don't encourage students to think that the way a person dresses indicates the kind of person they are or their capability to do a job.
Then some people dress a certain way specifically to be percieved a certain way.
Well, where do you weigh in? To what extent do clothes make the man?