Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

At least they're consistent!Follow

#1 Apr 23 2007 at 5:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Surprise suprise, women make less than men

Quote:
On payday, it's still a man's world
Study: Females earn 80 percent of what men earn one year after graduating from college; falls to 69 percent 10 years later.

April 23 2007: 7:58 AM EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) -- A dramatic pay gap emerges between women and men in America the year after they graduate from college and widens over the ensuing decade, according to research released on Monday.

One year out of college, women working full time earn 80 percent of what men earn, according to the study by the American Association of University Women Educational Foundation, based in Washington D.C.
Video More video
CNN's Ali Velshi reports on what lottery winner Brad Duke is doing with his time and money (April 19)
Play video
CNN's Seth Doane reports on IT jobs in India expanding from large cities to small villages. (April 22)
Play video

Ten years later, women earn 69 percent as much as men earn, it said.

Even as the study accounted for such factors as the number of hours worked, occupations or parenthood, the gap persisted, researchers said.

"If a woman and a man make the same choices, will they receive the same pay?" the study asked. "The answer is no.

"These unexplained gaps are evidence of discrimination, which remains a serious problem for women in the work force."


At least I can still make babies!

Nexa

Edited, Apr 23rd 2007 9:07am by Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#2 Apr 23 2007 at 5:09 AM Rating: Good
Nexa wrote:

At least I can still make babies!

Nexa


and dinner Smiley: tongue
#3 Apr 23 2007 at 5:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Soracloud the Charming wrote:
Nexa wrote:

At least I can still make babies!

Nexa


and dinner Smiley: tongue


Nah, the boyfriend makes dinner. Left on my own, I eat cereal.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#4 Apr 23 2007 at 5:12 AM Rating: Decent
Nexa wrote:
At least I can still make babies!

Nexa

Edited, Apr 23rd 2007 9:07am by Nexa


Fair trade if ya ask me.
#5 Apr 23 2007 at 5:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
Nexa wrote:
At least I can still make babies!

Nexa

Edited, Apr 23rd 2007 9:07am by Nexa


Fair trade if ya ask me.


And did anyone ask you?
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#6 Apr 23 2007 at 6:44 AM Rating: Decent
Samira wrote:
And did anyone ask you?


And as soon as I give a ****, I'll let you know.
#7 Apr 23 2007 at 8:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Kaelesh wrote:
Samira wrote:
And did anyone ask you?


And as soon as I give a sh*t, I'll let you know.

Isn't this an Asylum law, that if you give a sh*t enough to post, you can't use the "I don't give a sh*t" defense?

If not, I totally claim it right now.

Demea's Law

The following will no longer be considered acceptable for use in arguments over the internet(s):

  • "I don't care" - If you didn't care, you wouldn't post.
  • "You don't know me IRL" - While this may be true, this means that our only means of judging you is the personality that you portray in your posts. Therefore posting like a total fückwit, then claiming that you aren't like that at all in person, is just silly. Besides, you're a total fückwit, so why the hell should we believe you?
  • "I just know" - If you can't provide some form of reference to support a claim, even if it's just a wikipedia link, then you've no right to use that claim in an argument.
  • "Shut up" - No, you shut up.
  • "You guys are just elitist bastards" - Absolutely, 100% true. This fact, however, doesn't justify wild claims and absurd arguing points. Just because We is elitist, xenophobic pricks doesn't make you any less wrong.


Editted for spelling.

Edited, Apr 23rd 2007 11:53am by Demea
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#8 Apr 23 2007 at 9:19 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Demea wrote:
Best post ever.


If I had more sig room, it'd be there.
#9 Apr 23 2007 at 9:26 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Nexa wrote:
At least I can still make babies!
I'd say the value of a black-market baby should even the fiscal score.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Apr 23 2007 at 10:15 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Nexa wrote:
At least I can still make babies!
I'd say the value of a black-market baby should even the fiscal score.
Nah. No one wants the black ones except celebrities. Smiley: frown
#11 Apr 23 2007 at 10:20 AM Rating: Decent
Demea wrote:


Demea's Law

The following will no longer be considered acceptable for use in arguments over the internet(s):

  • "I don't care" - If you didn't care, you wouldn't post.
  • "You don't know me IRL" - While this may be true, this means that our only means of judging you is the personality that you portray in your posts. Therefore posting like a total fückwit, then claiming that you aren't like that at all in person, is just silly. Besides, you're a total fückwit, so why the hell should we believe you?
  • "I just know" - If you can't provide some form of reference to support a claim, even if it's just a wikipedia link, then you've no right to use that claim in an argument.
  • "Shut up" - No, you shut up.
  • "You guys are just elitist bastards" - Absolutely, 100% true. This fact, however, doesn't justify wild claims and absurd arguing points. Just because We is elitist, xenophobic pricks doesn't make you any less wrong.




Is "your a bunch of cyber-bullies, posting from your mom's basement" still valid?
#12 Apr 23 2007 at 10:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Think that one's a corollary to Joph's law.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#13 Apr 23 2007 at 12:43 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Samira wrote:
Think that one's a corollary to Joph's law.


I thought that was the one about the orphan children? With the hamsters? Maybe I'm thinking of something else...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#14 Apr 24 2007 at 12:05 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Quote:
"I don't care" - If you didn't care, you wouldn't post.


I explained a while back why that assertion is ********** Pretty sure you were there, though you didn't seem to get it then, either.
#15 Apr 24 2007 at 12:15 AM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts

Quote:
"I don't care" - If you didn't care, you wouldn't post.


That's a piece of poetry right there. You can't explain your way out of it.
#16 Apr 24 2007 at 5:10 AM Rating: Default
****
9,997 posts
Fortunately, in this world, just because you believe it doesn't make it true.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 295 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (295)