achileez wrote:
I wasn't talking about exceptions, thanks for providing one though. And I firmly believe anyone who owns a firearm should be required to take a safety training course. Simply saying 18yr olds aren't responsible enough to protect themselves doesn't cut it. The moment you're old enough to enlist and die for your country you are also old enough to participate in the rights guranteed by the constitution.
Do you have any logical reasoning why adults should not be able to exercise their constitutional rights?
Varus
I never said 18 year olds aren't responsible enough, I was disqualifying your anecdote about soldiers and civilians when they are clearly in completely different situations. Even military members do not walk around the streets of America with M-16s on their shoulders and grenades strapped to their chest.
The speech "The moment you're old enough to enlist and die for your country you are also old enough to (insert issue here)" is a tad worn as well. 18 is old enough to go to war but not to buy or consume alcohol, by cigarettes in some counties/states, purchase a firearm, purchase or sell pornography, and a whole mess of other things. I think it's safe to say the majority of Americans believe this is how things should be. Now on to your question.
Though I do call myself a Dem, I do not share the views of far-lefties either. Call it Centrism if it makes you feel better. I do think people should have the right of gun ownership, however I think many Americans do not see the need for Automatic, Semi-automatic, Assault Weapon, or handguns to be so readily available. A shotgun? Okay fine, a high-powered hunting rifle? Okay, I can agree with that. A Semi-Automatic AK-47 with a banana clip and bayonet? What in the world are you going to do with that?
I think it is the "dangerous guns" if you will, such as the semi-automatics and easily concealed handguns that are making a lot of Americans questioning gun control and it's apparent ineffectiveness. Fact is, the last 10 years or so these school shootings are becoming more frequent and much more deadly. No one is doing mass-killings at schools with a knife, sword, a bow and arrow, a crossbow, or a nun-chuck, they are using the very weapons that most people sit idly by in front of the TV and ask "Why are these guns legal?".
It takes quite a bit for the Constitution to be amended, but rest assured, when parents start worrying significantly about their children being killed at school by a crazed gunman with a semi-automatic assault rifle, amendment will be fully in the air.