Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Ok, white guys, settle a bet for me.Follow

#77 Apr 13 2007 at 12:25 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Tare wrote:
Nexa wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

You're pretty like my mom though.


Say what?


what.

Nexa


Lawl, that cracked me up, Nexa. Smiley: lol


For the last two days, I swear it's the only thing that's kept me going. I look at it about a hundred times a day and still laugh.

Have I mentioned I'm unstable, hahaha?

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#78 Apr 13 2007 at 12:26 PM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Nexa wrote:
Tare wrote:
Nexa wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

You're pretty like my mom though.


Say what?


what.

Nexa


Lawl, that cracked me up, Nexa. Smiley: lol


For the last two days, I swear it's the only thing that's kept me going. I look at it about a hundred times a day and still laugh.

Have I mentioned I'm unstable, hahaha?

Nexa


Well, now there's two of us!

Yay!
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#79 Apr 13 2007 at 12:26 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I don't think that's really any different than men.


Maybe. You don't hear the term 'Trophy Husband" all that often, but times are a changing I guess. I'm looking at YOU Demi Moore.



____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#80 Apr 13 2007 at 12:29 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
We all know she's only with Joph as an elaborate ploy to steal his silver flatware from his sister.
...And now my cover's blown. Thanks a lot, ***. Smiley: mad

Smasharoo wrote:
I think they'd generally choose someone they see as offering more financial security. Not to be cold, but most women don't marry the funny sweet poet.
Duh, the financial security guy is hubby #2.
#81 Apr 13 2007 at 12:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

I don't think that's really any different than men.


Maybe. You don't hear the term 'Trophy Husband" all that often, but times are a changing I guess. I'm looking at YOU Demi Moore.


True, but the term dowry comes to mind. Marrying for money isn't just a female tendency, nor would men doing so be a recent trend.

Ohhhh Willoughby...*sigh*

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#82 Apr 13 2007 at 12:32 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

True, but the term dowry comes to mind. Marrying for money isn't just a female tendency, nor would men doing so be a recent trend.


Don't be silly. The dowry was just compensation for the man taking on the financial support of a useless item (the woman) from another man. Just a business transaction.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#83 Apr 13 2007 at 12:35 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Nexa wrote:
Marrying for money isn't just a female tendency,
I'm going to disagree here. Historically speaking, marriage wasn't much of a plus for women EXCEPT that it gained them their own household and the accompanying social and financial status. It generally behooved Eliza to marry a Duke than Reverend John.
#84REDACTED, Posted: Apr 13 2007 at 1:02 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Nexa,
#85 Apr 13 2007 at 1:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
To be fair, Reverend John was kind of a stiff.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#86 Apr 13 2007 at 1:18 PM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Samira wrote:
To be fair, Reverend John was kind of a stiff.
You only say that now cuz they let you uppity womenz get jerbs.
#87 Apr 13 2007 at 1:19 PM Rating: Default
Once you got black you neva go back..
#88 Apr 13 2007 at 1:33 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,961 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
I think the Miss Nigeria picture is skewed. It's pikcing a woman with European-styled features and hair. If you want to stack it up right, make it Alek Wek, commonly considered a supermodel, against Carnie Wilson. (Carnie's on the right)

Is it ok to choose neither?
#89 Apr 13 2007 at 2:04 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,196 posts
Miss Nigeria over Ricki Lake. Then again, I'd go with what someone said earlier, attractive comes in many colors. The same can be said with ugly. Sorry, Ricki Lake is unattractive to me no matter who you compare her against.

If you were comparing Miss Nigeria with Carnie Wilson, I'd say I'd want both, as they are both attractive. I think Carnie Wilson looks great and while we were making the woo she could also sing for me (sue me, I think she has a great voice).

Varus wrote:
An entire thread so smashed can feel good about being a n*gger lover.


Hey now, be politically correct. That's "nappy-headed ho" lover to you, fella. Smiley: tongue



Don't fire me! Smiley: eek

____________________________
'Lo, there do I see, the line of my people, back to the beginning, 'lo do they call to me, they bid me take my place among them, in the halls of Valhalla, where the brave...may live...forever.

X-Box 360 Gamer Tag - Smogster
#90 Apr 13 2007 at 2:35 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
You think, though, that the majority of them would go for the funny, smart guy over the rich, handsome one?

Insane. Now, the majority might SAY that, but in practice, laughable. The same might be the case here.


But you're arguing a false dilema. It only makes sense if we assume that you must choose between funny/smart and rich. Presumably, the ratio of funny/smart guys among the pool of rich men is about the same as it is among working class joes, right? So there's no reason a woman wouldn't try to get a guy with money and the characteristics she's looking for, so no reason *not* to start with the more obvious external factors and then figure out the internal ones.

And I don't agree with you that the majority would settle for a rich guy they didn't like over a working class guy they did. But then maybe I have more faith in humanity then you do.


Quote:
Of all the cracker boys saying they'd take the black woman, probably 10% have ever been with one.


I'm pretty sure far fewer then 10% of us have bedded a model either. What's your point?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#91 Apr 13 2007 at 2:40 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I bet more people in this thread have slept with a black woman than slept with Rikki Lake!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#92 Apr 13 2007 at 2:42 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

But then maybe I have more faith in humanity then you do.


Just delusional, I expect. You probably count yourself among the smart or funny, which would skew your opinion wildly.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#93 Apr 13 2007 at 2:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

But then maybe I have more faith in humanity then you do.


Just delusional, I expect. You probably count yourself among the smart or funny, which would skew your opinion wildly.


I'm sure that 99% of men would probably do that.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#94 Apr 13 2007 at 2:49 PM Rating: Good
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I'm sure that 99% of men would probably do that.


Count Gbaji among the smart or funny? He should absolutely go gay then.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#95 Apr 13 2007 at 2:52 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I, on the other hand, in true realist fashion, consider myself fugly, poor, stupid and boring.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#96 Apr 13 2007 at 2:55 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

I'm sure that 99% of men would probably do that.


Count Gbaji among the smart or funny? He should absolutely go gay then.


99% of women too! I'm just the hawt!!! ;)

You're jealous. You know you are...
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#97 Apr 13 2007 at 3:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

I'm sure that 99% of men would probably do that.


Count Gbaji among the smart or funny? He should absolutely go gay then.


Probably should in any case.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#98 Apr 13 2007 at 3:08 PM Rating: Decent
Atomicflea wrote:


Smasharoo wrote:
I think they'd generally choose someone they see as offering more financial security. Not to be cold, but most women don't marry the funny sweet poet.
Duh, the financial security guy is hubby #2.


In California it's usually marry the rich guy, then divorce him and just live with the smart funny guy so they keep getting the alimony checks.
#99 Apr 13 2007 at 3:14 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
BloodwolfeX wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:


Smasharoo wrote:
I think they'd generally choose someone they see as offering more financial security. Not to be cold, but most women don't marry the funny sweet poet.
Duh, the financial security guy is hubby #2.


In California it's usually marry the rich guy, then divorce him and just live with the smart funny guy so they keep getting the alimony checks.


Sad and true.
#100 Apr 14 2007 at 6:33 AM Rating: Default
an attractive woman transcends all racial and social economical boundries.

a horney male, white, black, yellow, or brown, knows no racial or social economical boundries......for 15 minutes anyway........

your question is pointless.

IF we had a choice, we would do them both. if we couldnt do them both, we would do the one that didnt run away screaming. if they both ran away screaming, we sould do the one who ran the slowest. if we couldnt catch either of them, we would do whatever was closest to us.

its like what would a starving man prefer? steak or hamburger helper?

answer? the one he could get his hands on the quickest.
#101 Apr 14 2007 at 7:56 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
Nah, I think to equate to the OP, maybe Djimon Hounsou vs. Kevin James or something.


Jophiel wrote:
Why wouldn't it simply be race vs weight?

This guy or this guy?


Problem is, when you introduce race into a "who would you rather *****?" discussion by women about men, there are other factors which automatically skew the poll in favor of the black man. True, those other factors aren't entirely universal, but they're common enough that they'd be a consideration.

Personally, I'd probably choose a "so-so" black guy over an attractive white guy because when the sun rose, it's quite likely I'd have had a better ride with the black guy, all things considered. It's a question of better mileage (or at least, inch-age.)





Edited, Apr 14th 2007 8:57am by Ambrya
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 332 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (332)