trickybeck wrote:
Quote:
But in this case, the outrage wasn't those who were actually invested in any way with the advertising on his show.
If they refused to buy from his advertisers, that makes them
very invested with the advertising on his show.
But they didn't. That's the point. Get it?
I'm not aware of any significant number of actual people who said that they were upset enough by what Imus said to boycot the products of his advertisers.
I do know that a whole lot of political activists did demand that those same advertisers fire him though.
"The people", didn't do this. A relatively small number of people who have positioned themselves politically and claim to speak for the people did. Don't ever confuse the organization for the people. They are two different things.
I'm an advocate of free market processes, and the people voting both in elections and with their dollars. I'm *not* an advocate of political groups assuming they speak for the people and weilding that power on behalf of the people. That's a recipie for disaster.
Heck. Why not just let Sharpton and Jackson vote for everyone. Afterall, they know what's best for us, right?...