with muslim terrorists.
I'm still waiting for a Democrat plan that actually includes something other than a group committee on when they decide they're going to quit.
Varus
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Democrats still have no plan (other than talk) to deal...
Democrats still have no plan (other than talk) to deal...Follow
How many terrorist attacks have there been in the US since the Democratic congress took power.
That's right, none. Case closed.
That's right, none. Case closed.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Muslim terrorists are the least of the government's worries Virus. They have a war overseas(an insurgency in a different country does not constitute focussing on muslim terrorists in your country), and what with your leaders' stupididt,y probably another to come long before the lefties take power. They also should perhaps...focus on...the people in your country.
Oh, and Virus, here's a site where you'd be welcome, lots of Pubbie crazies there.
Hereya go
Oh, and Virus, here's a site where you'd be welcome, lots of Pubbie crazies there.
Hereya go
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust
The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning
Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
Oh, I think everyone agrees that the War on Terror must continue to be fought for the good of us all.
However, we need to get out of our Iraqui clusterfuck first.
However, we need to get out of our Iraqui clusterfuck first.
Smashed,
Glad to see you've finally come to your senses and recognize that Bush has been successfull in negating the terrorist threat on american soil.
Varus
Quote:
How many terrorist attacks have there been in the US since the Democratic congress took power.
That's right, none. Case closed.
That's right, none. Case closed.
Glad to see you've finally come to your senses and recognize that Bush has been successfull in negating the terrorist threat on american soil.
Varus
Driftwood,
So your solution is to do nothing. Glad to hear you come right out and say it. Duck and cover sure is a great way to fight terrorists.
Varus
Quote:
Muslim terrorists are the least of the government's worries Virus. They have a war overseas(an insurgency in a different country does not constitute focussing on muslim terrorists in your country), and what with your leaders' stupididt,y probably another to come long before the lefties take power. They also should perhaps...focus on...the people in your country.
So your solution is to do nothing. Glad to hear you come right out and say it. Duck and cover sure is a great way to fight terrorists.
Varus
Glad to see you've finally come to your senses and recognize that Bush has been successfull in negating the terrorist threat on american soil.
How do you figure?
Terrorist attacks in US since Bush took office: 1
Terrorist attacks in US since Pelosi took office: 0.
Nancy is tougher on terror. Bush is clearly soft.
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
achileez wrote:
Driftwood,
So your solution is to do nothing. Glad to hear you come right out and say it. Duck and cover sure is a great way to fight terrorists.
Varus
Quote:
Muslim terrorists are the least of the government's worries Virus. They have a war overseas(an insurgency in a different country does not constitute focussing on muslim terrorists in your country), and what with your leaders' stupididt,y probably another to come long before the lefties take power. They also should perhaps...focus on...the people in your country.
So your solution is to do nothing. Glad to hear you come right out and say it. Duck and cover sure is a great way to fight terrorists.
Varus
You're disillusioned if you really believe the war in iraq is all about stopping terrorism. Security on THIS side of the Atlantic is what's gonna stop terrorism, not a war that does nothing but create a whole new generation of Arabs who hate us. I'm not suggesting we just totally leave, but we're definitely not doing the right things atm.
If you're so worried about tyrannical regimes why do we support Saudi Arabia? Oh yea, they have oil.
Why don't we stop some of the tyrannical regimes in Africa? Oh yea that's right, they have no natural resources we want.
DaimenKain wrote:
achileez wrote:
Driftwood,
So your solution is to do nothing. Glad to hear you come right out and say it. Duck and cover sure is a great way to fight terrorists.
Varus
Quote:
Muslim terrorists are the least of the government's worries Virus. They have a war overseas(an insurgency in a different country does not constitute focussing on muslim terrorists in your country), and what with your leaders' stupididt,y probably another to come long before the lefties take power. They also should perhaps...focus on...the people in your country.
So your solution is to do nothing. Glad to hear you come right out and say it. Duck and cover sure is a great way to fight terrorists.
Varus
You're disillusioned if you really believe the war in iraq is all about stopping terrorism. Security on THIS side of the Atlantic is what's gonna stop terrorism, not a war that does nothing but create a whole new generation of Arabs who hate us. I'm not suggesting we just totally leave, but we're definitely not doing the right things atm.
If you're so worried about tyrannical regimes why do we support Saudi Arabia? Oh yea, they have oil.
Why don't we stop some of the tyrannical regimes in Africa? Oh yea that's right, they have no natural resources we want.
I miss the times when they loved the West.
MuffinMan the Fussy wrote:
DaimenKain wrote:
achileez wrote:
Driftwood,
So your solution is to do nothing. Glad to hear you come right out and say it. Duck and cover sure is a great way to fight terrorists.
Varus
Quote:
Muslim terrorists are the least of the government's worries Virus. They have a war overseas(an insurgency in a different country does not constitute focussing on muslim terrorists in your country), and what with your leaders' stupididt,y probably another to come long before the lefties take power. They also should perhaps...focus on...the people in your country.
So your solution is to do nothing. Glad to hear you come right out and say it. Duck and cover sure is a great way to fight terrorists.
Varus
You're disillusioned if you really believe the war in iraq is all about stopping terrorism. Security on THIS side of the Atlantic is what's gonna stop terrorism, not a war that does nothing but create a whole new generation of Arabs who hate us. I'm not suggesting we just totally leave, but we're definitely not doing the right things atm.
If you're so worried about tyrannical regimes why do we support Saudi Arabia? Oh yea, they have oil.
Why don't we stop some of the tyrannical regimes in Africa? Oh yea that's right, they have no natural resources we want.
I miss the times when they loved the West.
Well we haven't done much to change their minds.
DaimenKain wrote:
Well we haven't done much to change their minds.
You are aware that the number one reason "Arabs hate us" is because we have a long history of promising them that we'll back them if they do something we want, then they do it, we back out of the deal, and they get screwed.
Kinda exactly like we'd do *again* if we pull out of Iraq. But hey! Keep that bubble-wrap tight around your head and maybe everything will work out ok...
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
gbaji wrote:
Keep that bubble-wrap tight around your head
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Keep that bubble-wrap tight around your head
gbaji and his autoeroticasphyxiation kink.
Why does anyone bother to even reply to any thread Varus makes?
Better question...why is someone rating Virus above the filter?
gbaji wrote:
DaimenKain wrote:
Well we haven't done much to change their minds.
You are aware that the number one reason "Arabs hate us" is because we have a long history of promising them that we'll back them if they do something we want, then they do it, we back out of the deal, and they get screwed.
Kinda exactly like we'd do *again* if we pull out of Iraq. But hey! Keep that bubble-wrap tight around your head and maybe everything will work out ok...
I think our support of Israel is the #1 reason they hate us.
DaimenKain wrote:
I think our support of Israel is the #1 reason they hate us.
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
The fact that they have no plan to deal with terrorists doesn't worry me at all really, Americans are good at improv. What really worries me is that they have no plan to secure Iraq. We've marched in on a hunch, broken all the laws of physics and made life for the Iraqi people even more hell than it was before. What the Democrats want to do is run away and leave the situation to get worse on its own, like a bomb squad running away from a populated apartment complex, and that just ain't right. We've screwed things up for the Iraqi people, we should stay and fix things for the Iraqi people.
achileez wrote:
Democrats still have no plan (other than talk) to deal...with muslim terrorists.
Last I checked, neither did the Pubbies. No plan for border control. Wait, they did have a plan, one that actually stripped rights from the free people of this country. Still left the doors wide open to get in, but my god, they can tell you what you said to Aunt Fergie last month.
When someone actually makes an attempt to regulate the borders with Mexico and Canada (because you know those Canadians like to blow them selves up and kill people), then they can say that they're doing something about trying to control terrorism in this country.
Hey Smash, if Bill hadn't dropped the ball in the '90s, I'd believe you about the Dems being hard on terroism. Pelosi doesn't count for Shit, she's not the president.
Terrorist attacks:
Clinton: 5
Bush: 1
Edited, Apr 6th 2007 12:53pm by Metastophicleas
veneret wrote:
...broken all the laws of physics
Bush is no longer just a mere king now, he must be God.
Quote:
Terrorist attacks:
Clinton: 5
Bush: 1
Clinton: 5
Bush: 1
Let's compare lives lost in overall conflict of civilians, military and contracted security forces.
veneret wrote:
What the Democrats want to do is run away and leave the situation to get worse on its own, like a bomb squad running away from a populated apartment complex, and that just ain't right. We've screwed things up for the Iraqi people, we should stay and fix things for the Iraqi people.
You say that as though we'd demonstrated any ability or inclination to do so.
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Lefian wrote:
Quote:
Terrorist attacks:
Clinton: 5
Bush: 1
Clinton: 5
Bush: 1
Let's compare lives lost in overall conflict of civilians, military and contracted security forces.
We can do that, but I'd suggest sticking 9/11 on Clinton, mostly because he either cut off Able Danger, or had it cut off, thus contributing directly to the 9/11 attacks, which were planned for over a year before. Of course, one would then have to wonder why the US under Clinton was so hated to be attacked.
Samira wrote:
veneret wrote:
What the Democrats want to do is run away and leave the situation to get worse on its own, like a bomb squad running away from a populated apartment complex, and that just ain't right. We've screwed things up for the Iraqi people, we should stay and fix things for the Iraqi people.
You say that as though we'd demonstrated any ability or inclination to do so.
Agreed. Our government has proven that it is unable to fix such a small thing like Social Security, or the tax codes, yet it is expected to "fix" Iraq. I don't see it happening in the near future.
Metastophicleas wrote:
Lefian wrote:
Quote:
Terrorist attacks:
Clinton: 5
Bush: 1
Clinton: 5
Bush: 1
Let's compare lives lost in overall conflict of civilians, military and contracted security forces.
We can do that, but I'd suggest sticking 9/11 on Clinton, mostly because he either cut off Able Danger, or had it cut off, thus contributing directly to the 9/11 attacks, which were planned for over a year before. Of course, one would then have to wonder why the US under Clinton was so hated to be attacked.
So tell us again what Bush did between Jan 20, 2001 and Sept. 11, 2001 to prevent terrorism? That's about 8 months in office correct?
Hey Smash, if Bill hadn't dropped the ball in the '90s, I'd believe you about the Dems being hard on terroism. Pelosi doesn't count for ****, she's not the president.
Terrorist attacks:
Clinton: 5
Bush: 1
No.
Terrorist attacks in the USA:
Bush: 1
Clinton: 1
Terrorist attacks on US Citizens anywhere in the world:
Clinton: 5
Bush: thousands.
Your chances of dying a US citizen in a terrorist attack while Clinton was President was roughly 1 in 100 million.
With Bush it's about 1 in 500,000, so in terms of terrorist attacks, you were about 200 times safer under Clinton.
Sorry, sucker. I know you'd like to blame all of dead people directly caused by Bush's decisions on Clinton, but really, it's time to be a man and just accept the truth. Not that I think you will, of course. People who aren't gigantic cowards long ago dropped any pretense of thinking Bush was somehow better on National Security than a retarded chimpanse.
:(
Disclaimer:
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.
Recent Visitors: 245
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (245)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Democrats still have no plan (other than talk) to deal...
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC