Would you switch?Follow

Home Brew.

I think it's an interesting topic. I've never smoked cigs, but I like the occasional cigar. In highschool I did my fair share of weed, and in college my fair share of alcohol. I'd have to say that with new laws I would not miss alcohol nor tobacco and I'd probably divulge in the occasional "old man peace pipe". As in weed in one of those old man pipes, not one of those fangled new pipes the kids use. It would be great on a nogahide recliner with a smoking jacket.

I'd look like this guy but with a different kind of tobacco.

I've been meaning to learn how to make my own beer anyway.

Take my booze?! From my cold, dead hand you son of a bitCh.

Now, if just pot were legalized and cigarettes criminalized, I'd smoke joints all day, every day.

I don't agree with the study. They're taking into account the harmful effects on your body with a standard dose when most of the harm is caused by your actions due to having your mind altered and/or taking too much of the harder drugs. Seriously they're saying Marijuana is more harmful than Ecstacy. When's the last time you heard of someone ODing on Marijuana?

I voted to find a way to get my Cigs and Alcohol. Frankly I don't think any of it should be illegal, it's your choice if you want to poison your body.

while



Amen!


I wouldn't miss alchool at all.

And weed is pretty much like alchool in terms of harm, but at least it turns people into smily, if somewhat lazy, people. As opposed to alchool that generally turns you into a priCk.

I do think ecstasy is quite harmful on the long-term if you do too much. It's bad for your general state of mind too. But if you can manage to take one, say, once or twice a year, its really completely harmless. I knew some people that did 7 a night when I was at Uni, and they were pretty fUcked up.

Like, Monx-fUcked-up.

Cigarettes should be illegal either way. It's just pure poison.



Edited, Mar 30th 2007 5:34pm by RedPhoenixxx

I only tried ecstacy a couple times, but I was pretty bored with it. Back when I would have partaken of such things, I much preferred shrooms or ketamine.

No, they usually surrender.

Un homme se rend à l'aéroport:
-Un billet pour Londres s'il vous plait.
-Votre nom ?
-Glloq.
-Eppellez.
-G-L-L-O-Q (j'ai deux ailles au cul)
-Pourquoi vous n'y allez pas tout seul ?





*rimshot*

Good thing this scenario isn't withing the realm of reality.

You show me a president that will outlaw drinking (again) and I'll show you a dead man.

Most of what they're saying has been known for a while; however, I'm wondering exactly what criterion they're using to determine "harmfulness". For example, heroin has effectively zero side-effects when used "correctly". People tend to overdose on it, but aside from that the primary side-effect is that it is incredibly, incredibly addictive. That makes me suspect that they are relying partially on actual statistics rather than scientific results.

Personally, I would be satisfied with making alcohol a permanent prescription drug (just so it's less convenient to get, especially for minors), and making tobacco prescription available to those over the legal age currently, but not to minors at the time of implementing the legislation.

And I think marijuana should follow the same suit as being medically prescribed but available for recreation. I don't know if it's just conspiracy ********* but I've heard that one of the main reasons it's not legal is the paper/cloth industries not wanting it to be a competing market (apparently it's much more efficient for paper than trees, and more efficient for cloth than cotton). Again, maybe that's just political spin or lies, I haven't researched it.

I refrain from all alcohol and drugs in order to avoid tainting my precious bodily fluids.

But surely you allow yourself of rain water and pure grain alcohol?

Weed would, of course, be my poison of choice, but legalizing extasy? That's bizarre...