Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Could Elizabeth Edwards festering cancer filled booby win?Follow

#1 Mar 22 2007 at 12:31 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17740090/site/newsweek/


I’ve seen a lot of press conferences, but none like the one that Edwards and his wife Elizabeth held on a sun-dappled lawn in Chapel Hill, N.C. Bottom line: yes, Elizabeth Edwards’s breast cancer had spread to the bone. No, there was no immediate danger. No, it was not curable, but yes, it was treatable—treatment would last the rest of her life, however long that may be (years or even decades). As for the campaign, he said, “it goes on, goes on strongly.


I'm a little worried, now. Obamma needs to prop up a sick relative pretty soon or this could be a real problem. I'm not sure current polling appropriately shows the 'dying wife' factor.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#2 Mar 22 2007 at 12:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Well, the sympathy vote will be upset by the heartless pragmatists who ask if they want a man in the White House who's distracted by a dying wife.

Really too bad she can't have something more picturesque, like consumption.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#3 Mar 22 2007 at 12:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
How do I know that Edwards didn't poison his wife? This needs to be investigated by a PAC of Republican doctors and the results publicized in TV/Radio commercial form post haste.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#4 Mar 22 2007 at 12:36 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
I hope they all die and rot in the grave.

I'm over the whole political scene. They're all nothing more than greedy, spendthrifts that want to take our money to "better other people's lives". They all, Republicrat, Democan't, and all of those that just want to pander to the cameras, can go fUck themselves with dead horse bones and die, the lying fUckers..

Was that a little too harsh?
#5 Mar 22 2007 at 12:36 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Well, the sympathy vote will be upset by the heartless pragmatists who ask if they want a man in the White House who's distracted by a dying wife.


In the Democratic primaries? I doubt the pragmatists are going to think "We're better off with a woman or a black dude than a white southerner with a dying wife"
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#6 Mar 22 2007 at 12:37 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
heh, earlier today I turned off CSPAN radio during like an hour long interview with her... I sat there like "WTF am I listening to? Why the fúck is this on Cspan?"

luckily Kojo Nambe was there for me
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#7 Mar 22 2007 at 12:38 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


Was that a little too harsh?


No, it's exactly what they want your demographic to think so that you don't bother to vote and they can keep spewing out easy to comprehend bold faced lies to the people who will mindlessly vote based on who has the best TV commercial.

Grats being sold so easily, I guess.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#8 Mar 22 2007 at 12:38 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Yeah, but can he pull off a convincing TV comedy sketch?

That's the real test of a national leader!

Just ask Tony Bliar (He was fUcking good though)
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#9 Mar 22 2007 at 12:39 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Metastophicleas wrote:
They all, Republicrat, Democan't
With fresh material like that, you should be writing for National Lampoon.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Mar 22 2007 at 12:44 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
I think it's in the Constitution or something that we cannot have presidents whose names end in Vowels....

I could be wrong..
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#11 Mar 22 2007 at 12:45 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
No, it's exactly what they want your demographic to think so that you don't bother to vote and they can keep spewing out easy to comprehend bold faced lies to the people who will mindlessly vote based on who has the best TV commercial.

Grats being sold so easily, I guess.



Ah...no, where you're wrong is thinking that I wouldn't vote to begin with. I'll vote, but for a Constitution party member, or an independent conservative, which ever is running.

Problem is this: The majority of American voters are so f'n stupid, they don't know what the Constitution is, or where it's kept, much less who the man was that penned it.

What's sad is that immigrants coming into this country, and become citizens (the right way), know more about this nation than most of the dumbasses that are granted citizenship by birthright.
#12 Mar 22 2007 at 12:46 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Ah...no, where you're wrong is thinking that I wouldn't vote to begin with. I'll vote, but for a Constitution party member, or an independent conservative, which ever is running.


Right, you won't vote.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#13 Mar 22 2007 at 12:47 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Metastophicleas wrote:
They all, Republicrat, Democan't
With fresh material like that, you should be writing for National Lampoon.


I wonder what they pay...

You have to admit that both parties have let us down over the last several decades on most issues, most of the time.
#14 Mar 22 2007 at 12:48 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Ah...no, where you're wrong is thinking that I wouldn't vote to begin with. I'll vote, but for a Constitution party member, or an independent conservative, which ever is running.


Right, you won't vote.



I'm glad I'm not quite as jadded as you are...yet.
#15 Mar 22 2007 at 12:52 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


You have to admit that both parties have let us down over the last several decades on most issues, most of the time.


I don't think so, really. I think they've been fairly effective at giving the majority of people in the US what they want, a schizophrenic, inconsistent mix of arbitrary laws based mostly on corporate interests with occasional nods to fear and prejudice.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#16 Mar 22 2007 at 11:17 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Well, on the other hand Hillary is frigid enough to pretty much be a corpse already.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#17 Mar 23 2007 at 7:11 PM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
Personally, I find Edward's refusal to back out of the campaign rather disturbing. I don't know which is worse-- having a president who has a divided attention, split between his ailing wife and a national crisis or a man who willingly sacrifices time and attention to his ailing wife for political office.

Spin it all they like, but the talking head's insistence that her cancer does not automatically mean death, just points to the protracted nature of the disease and how a sitting president would be completely distracted by her condition.

On the other hand, he could wait for her to croak and then run, thus getting a mortal lock on the cancer, widower, and trophy wife wannabe demographic...

Totem
#18 Mar 23 2007 at 7:30 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Yeah, because what she needs is for him to sit at home and stare at her looking for signs of impending death.

I think it's pretty courageous for both of them to continue living, personally.

I don't think he has a snowball's chance in hell of winning, though. Enough people will hypocritically "blame" him for "selfishly" pursuing the nomination, while of course they don't say a word about people like Gingrich who divorce their cancer-stricken wives.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#19 Mar 24 2007 at 7:07 AM Rating: Good
*****
16,160 posts
No argument there, Sammy, about hypocrisy, but courageousness or not, I hold the president-- or a candidate --up to the same standard as I demand of myself towards my wife, that is, fidelity, devotion, and an explicit understanding that she is more important than any job or prestigious position.

/shrugs

If my wife had inoperable cancer you can bet I'd give up anything and everything to spend every available moment with her, especially if that "anything" was a political office that required my attention 24/7 for four years straight.

Totem
#20 Mar 24 2007 at 8:18 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Why, Totem. I seem to remember that Mrs. Totem had a serious illness a couple of years ago that ended up with her insisting you get out of her hair because your moping around was making her feel worse.

Do I misremember that?

No one who is sick wants to be fussed over more than is necessary (and sometimes not that much). Mrs. Edwards' cancer, while not considered curable, is probably manageable. She's not going to die for years, barring a drastic change - which could happen to anyone. Ask Mr. Cheney about that.

I think I'd be more comfortable with a chronically ill First Lady than I am with a chronically ill VP. However, my perspective is no doubt skewed.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#21 Mar 26 2007 at 2:11 AM Rating: Decent
I'm a bit torn to be honest.

I read about it, and Edwards said "The campaign is going strong". Well, sorry mate, but it's not. Your wife has incurable cancer. It's not "going strong", unless you mean you'll get the sympathy vote.

I get a bit tired of this mindless optimism and positive spin on everything. Your wife has incurable cancer, don't say "it's going strong". It's not, and every single human being with an ounce of compassion will understand if you take time off campaigning. If you say "it's an unexpected personal tragedy, that puts my presidential campaign in doubt."

Don't get me wrong, I like the guy, but you don't have to be mindlessly positive all the time.

It reminds of of a Blackadder episode, where Edmund Blackadder is about to be tried for treason, and learns that the haplessly optimistic George (Hugh Laurie) is his lawyer:

Quote:

Edmund: George, I'm in trouble here. I need to construct a defense thats as watertighta s a mermaid's brassiere. I'm not sure your particular brand of mindless optimism is going to contribute much to the proceedings.

George: Well, that's a shame, sir, because I was planning on playing the mindless optimisim card very strongly.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 304 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (304)