Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Slavery....good for African-Americans?Follow

#1 Mar 20 2007 at 8:40 PM Rating: Decent
Lol, no I'm not advocating that we enslave black people or something. I'm just curious if people think that, in the long run, Slavery was a good thing for African-Americans. Obviously, I'm not saying that slavery was a cake-walk, or that Americans were justified in what they did; it was a horrible experience for the people who were actually enslaved, but what about their descendents?

It seems that if it weren't for slavery, many current African-Americans would probably be in Africa right now dying of AIDS or hunger, and not living in the Land of Opportunity, where they might not have an equal opportunity to succeed, but surely a better one than your average African.

I totally expect to be flamed, but hopefully there are some people out there who won't misconstrue what I'm trying to say.
#2 Mar 20 2007 at 8:56 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Not to bring up the obvious but, had their descendents not been captured and dragged over to the US and met their spouses and etc, etc then today's crop of African-Americans would simply not exist. They wouldn't be in Africa dying of famine and AIDS.

Had the United States not participated in the slave trade and the associated attitudes of blacks as inferior humans, I'd guess that there would have been some form of an immigration boom out of Africa in the 1900s anyway. A better "what if?" might be to question what the state of modern Africa would be had it not been carved into colonial European holdings in the late 1800's and then left as a collection of nation states with corrupt quasi-western governments. Would the standards of living be noticably different?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#3 Mar 20 2007 at 9:01 PM Rating: Default
Prediction: This thread is gonna be no-holds-barred.
#4REDACTED, Posted: Mar 20 2007 at 9:07 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Isn't that what this forum's for?
#5 Mar 20 2007 at 9:18 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Isn't that what this forum's for?
no the aslyum is for people who all think alike and rate any one who disagree's with them down. it's pretty much like high-class snobby types.
#6 Mar 20 2007 at 9:18 PM Rating: Decent
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
If I was going to go the Historical Troll angle I would have gone the route of

"Did America contribute to the development of the Hybrid Car by Nuking Hiroshima"


Less obvious and rife for Hello Kitty jokes.



Edited, Mar 21st 2007 1:21am by bodhisattva
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#7 Mar 20 2007 at 9:27 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Had the United States not participated in the slave trade and the associated attitudes of blacks as inferior humans, I'd guess that there would have been some form of an immigration boom out of Africa in the 1900s anyway. A better "what if?" might be to question what the state of modern Africa would be had it not been carved into colonial European holdings in the late 1800's and then left as a collection of nation states with corrupt quasi-western governments. Would the standards of living be noticably different?

Ethiopia was never colonised save a brief time in WWII, did not seem to work out so well for them.
#8 Mar 20 2007 at 9:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Magnavoxroan wrote:
no the aslyum is for people who all think alike and rate any one who disagree's with them down. it's pretty much like high-class snobby types.
Don't forget the butt-hurt! Sometimes they come by and post as well!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#9 Mar 20 2007 at 9:33 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Allegory wrote:
Ethiopia was never colonised save a brief time in WWII, did not seem to work out so well for them.
True although they were hardly spared European influence. I don't know if the status of Ethiopia alone proves much.

Then again, maybe Africa would be the same place it is today, only with different national borders.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Mar 20 2007 at 9:33 PM Rating: Default
Quote:
Don't forget the butt-hurt! Sometimes they come by and post as well!
Facts are facts ^^
#11 Mar 20 2007 at 9:34 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
You could say it's similar to what Hitler did with the concentration camps. Sure what he did was horrible, but all those experiments on live humans contributed to today's medical knowledge and procedures. Knowledge that saves lives. I'm not saying he was justified in what he did; it was a horrible experience for the people who were tortured, but what about the health of man kind?
#12 Mar 20 2007 at 9:38 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Jophiel wrote:
True although they were hardly spared European influence. I don't know if the status of Ethiopia alone proves much.

Then again, maybe Africa would be the same place it is today, only with different national borders.

Regardless of the political effects of the Africa Rush, it did at as a catalyst for African development. Railroads were built and trade increased.

In asking the question "did slavery ultimately behoove blacks," you treat a race as a people rather than individuals. It's not as if had there been no slavery involvement by the U.S. you would transplant every descendent into a shack in the Congo, causality does not work that way.

Edited, Mar 21st 2007 12:39am by Allegory
#13 Mar 20 2007 at 9:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Allegory wrote:
Regardless of the political effects of the Africa Rush, it did at as a catalyst for African development. Railroads were built and trade increased.
Oh, sure. That was the jist and lead-in from my original response to the thread. Had the US not received an influx of Afrians as slaves in the years prior to 1860, it almost certainly would have after the colonial era in Africa winded down and the people there had access to the US via ships, planes and rail lines to the African coast. Perhaps not in the same quantities but I think it would have, to some extent, mimiced the immigrations from Asia.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#14 Mar 20 2007 at 9:46 PM Rating: Default
MentalFrog wrote:
You could say it's similar to what Hitler did with the concentration camps. Sure what he did was horrible, but all those experiments on live humans contributed to today's medical knowledge and procedures. Knowledge that saves lives. I'm not saying he was justified in what he did; it was a horrible experience for the people who were tortured, but what about the health of man kind?


You could, and yes, that's actually a good comparison. However, I think the impact on the medical world was significantly less because of the Holocaust compared to the impact on the descendents of the slaves.

It sounds horrible, like I'm condoning slavery or even the Holocaust, but I'm not. I'm just pointing out that good things come out of horrible events, and wanted to see what you guys think. I'm actually impressed that this hasn't already degrading into some kind of flame-fest, and I commend you all.

Btw, frog I have no idea whether your post is serious or you're taking some kind of stab at me, but if it's the latter you disguised it well lol.
#15 Mar 20 2007 at 9:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Magnavoxroan wrote:
Quote:
Isn't that what this forum's for?
no the aslyum is for people who all think alike and rate any one who disagree's with them down. it's pretty much like high-class snobby types.

Have you actually read any of the threads here?
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#16 Mar 20 2007 at 9:50 PM Rating: Default
Allegory wrote:

In asking the question "did slavery ultimately behoove blacks," you treat a race as a people rather than individuals. It's not as if had there been no slavery involvement by the U.S. you would transplant every descendent into a shack in the Congo, causality does not work that way.

Edited, Mar 21st 2007 12:39am by Allegory


Well, I never meant to say that EVERY descendent of former slaves would be living in poverty in Africa, but I don't think it's unrealistic to say that for a many of them, their life (or socioeconmic status) would be worse. In other words, I think that if slavery didn't happen more of the people who are now "African-Americans" would be worse off.

#17 Mar 20 2007 at 9:55 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
DaimenKain wrote:
Well, I never meant to say that EVERY descendent of former slaves would be living in poverty in Africa, but I don't think it's unrealistic to say that for a many of them, their life (or socioeconmic status) would be worse. In other words, I think that if slavery didn't happen more of the people who are now "African-Americans" would be worse off.

As Jophiel stated immigration would liekly occur and we'd see a number likely moving to the U.S. and other countries looking for jobs. Or perhaps we would have isntead engaged in trade and invested more in the country, perhaps raising the average standard of living.

There is no way to accurately speculate, nor would a simple yes or no resposne suffice. I would liken the question to a past tense butterfly effect.
#18 Mar 20 2007 at 9:57 PM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Quote:
Well, I never meant to say that EVERY descendent of former slaves would be living in poverty in Africa, but I don't think it's unrealistic to say that for a many of them, their life (or socioeconmic status) would be worse. In other words, I think that if slavery didn't happen more of the people who are now "African-Americans" would be worse off.

Of course, in this argument, you assume that the world would be exactly as it is today, only without the previous existence of slavery, and that the majority of blacks would still be in Africa.

Since your initial premise is that the world would be different, you can't then claim that it would be exactly the same. Circular logic.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#19 Mar 20 2007 at 10:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
From what I've heard, not a whole lot of useful information came from the Mengele experiments (and others like it). Some data on hypothermia and altitude stress on the human body but the bulk of his data was either:

(a) unscientific crap born more of sadism than anything else and thusly poorly documented and executed with extremely shitty methodology including a lack of control variables, shoddy record keeping, manipulating data to fit pre-conceived theories, using malnourished and weakened subjects in physical experiments, etc. This includes the "twins" experiments (minus the obvious 'control' critique).
-or-
(b) available from other sources and generally in more accurate form.

...and even Rascher's hypothermia data is open to debate as it's been suggested that Himmler told Rascher to provide some useful results or else. My limited understanding is that both the Soviets and British RAF made use of the altitude sickness data though and I'd suspect the US as well.

Keep in mind that this is specifically regarding concentration-camp experiments. Pernkopf, for example, was a reknown doctor in the field of human biology and as big a **** as you could hope to find but did not use prisoners in his research.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Mar 20 2007 at 10:07 PM Rating: Default
Demea wrote:
Quote:
Well, I never meant to say that EVERY descendent of former slaves would be living in poverty in Africa, but I don't think it's unrealistic to say that for a many of them, their life (or socioeconmic status) would be worse. In other words, I think that if slavery didn't happen more of the people who are now "African-Americans" would be worse off.

Of course, in this argument, you assume that the world would be exactly as it is today, only without the previous existence of slavery, and that the majority of blacks would still be in Africa.

Since your initial premise is that the world would be different, you can't then claim that it would be exactly the same. Circular logic.


Well the reason I make this argument is because I see what the Africans who weren't enslaved accomplished. In my opinion, I just think that slavery didn't have a huge impact on the development (or lack thereof) of Africa in the last 200 years. About 12 million people were removed from Africa during the European slave trade, and I just don't see how the loss of those people would have a hugely profound effect on the development of Africa.

I don't think there would have been mass immigration because there wasn't a mass influx of Africans who weren't enslaved.
#21 Mar 20 2007 at 10:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
DaimenKain wrote:
I don't think there would have been mass immigration because there wasn't a mass influx of Africans who weren't enslaved.
During the brief window of opportunity where Africa was industrialized enough to allow for such immigration and the United States was still allowing immigration on a "Show up and sign the book" basis, the social climate towards Africans wasn't exactly a welcoming one. Even in comparison to the prejudices against Asians, Eastern Europeans, etc.

Had the nation not built its anti-black prejudices via a century or so of legalized dehumanizing of blacks into property, it may have been a very different story on the immigration front.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#22 Mar 20 2007 at 10:28 PM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:
DaimenKain wrote:
I don't think there would have been mass immigration because there wasn't a mass influx of Africans who weren't enslaved.
During the brief window of opportunity where Africa was industrialized enough to allow for such immigration and the United States was still allowing immigration on a "Show up and sign the book" basis, the social climate towards Africans wasn't exactly a welcoming one. Even in comparison to the prejudices against Asians, Eastern Europeans, etc.

Had the nation not built its anti-black prejudices via a century or so of legalized dehumanizing of blacks into property, it may have been a very different story on the immigration front.


Perhaps that's true, but plenty of other cultures had prejudicial obstacles to overcome. As you've noted, maybe not as bad as the prejudices Africans felt, but close enough for government work (ha ha).

#23 Mar 20 2007 at 10:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
DaimenKain wrote:
Perhaps that's true, but plenty of other cultures had prejudicial obstacles to overcome. As you've noted, maybe not as bad as the prejudices Africans felt, but close enough for government work (ha ha).
Nothing remotely as bad. Not even close.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#24 Mar 20 2007 at 10:58 PM Rating: Default
Jophiel wrote:
Nothing remotely as bad. Not even close.


Do you really think that the Japanese were very welcome immigrants in the 1950s? Hell even the 1850s?

Chinese people couldn't get a job anywhere thanks to extreme prejudice; that's why they were the ones who broke their backs to build the railroads out west.

While I do agree that Africans probably had it worse, it's inaccurate to say that no other group of immigrants felt anything remotely close to the prejudice that Africans faced.
#25 Mar 20 2007 at 11:00 PM Rating: Decent
*****
19,369 posts
DaimenKain wrote:
While I do agree that Africans probably had it worse, it's inaccurate to say that no other group of immigrants felt anything remotely close to the prejudice that Africans faced.


Smiley: dubious
#26 Mar 20 2007 at 11:02 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Perhaps R&B (and I dont mean Rhythm and Blues, John Lee Hooker stylee) would never have been born...


Now that would have been a good thing for mankind as a whole surely?
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

« Previous 1 2 3
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 358 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (358)