Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

I think we touched on this before....Follow

#52 Mar 15 2007 at 8:34 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,829 posts
Smasharoo wrote:

Maybe this is semantics. You don't think it's more likely they understand 'when Daddy used that tone of voice before, he hit me, that sucked' then 'Father is disciplining me for demanding an extended television watching period and hurling things at him to make my point clear. Oh dear, I will endeavor to avoid that in the future.'


It depends on their stage of cognitive development. Both sets of cognitions amount to, "If I do A, Mom/Dad does B, and B is bad, therefore A is bad." The reasoning is just more sophisticated in the second case.

You seem to be saying that:

Quote:
'when Daddy used that tone of voice before, he hit me, that sucked'
is not a good thing, but honestly, when it's all they are capable of comprehending, then it's getting the job done of conveying to the child that there are certain lines that SHALL NOT BE CROSSED.

I know the gold standard is for Mom/Dad to always be this wonderful, glowing, safe presence, but that doesn't have to equate to "Mom/Dad = Doormat." If the child feels TOO safe, to the point where he thinks he can do absolutely anything and there will be no ramifications, then there needs to be a reality check, a point at which they understand, if they cross the line, Mom/Dad will not be so safe, Mom/Dad can be a bit scary (not harmful-scary, just surprising-scary), so it's best not to cross that line.

Even a toddler has the cognitive ability to form the association, "throwing myself down on the aisle of the grocery store and kicking boxes of cereal onto the floor = SafeMommy becomes ScaryMommy, thus throwing myself down on the aisle of the grocery store and kicking boxes of cereal onto the floor = BAD."

#53 Mar 15 2007 at 8:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Here's a fun alternative for you: instead of spanking your children, give them manual labor. I can personally attest to its effectiveness. After all, I turned out pretty on-the-ball (although the mere act of posting here puts that into question).
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#54 Mar 15 2007 at 8:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Frakkor wrote:
"Get out of the path of that moving car, or I'm going to put your dog to sleep!"



"In my old wrestling singleton! Do you want to be scarred for life, Timmy? DO YOU?"
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#55 Mar 15 2007 at 8:34 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
but the only time I got smacked for real was when I mocked my mother and screamed at her, and boy, I never did that again, nor do I use it to [:school:] children as to what works and what doesn't.


I talked back to my Dad when I was 16 and he belted me under the chin. I swear I had trouble chewing for 2 weeks. The click in my jaw reminds me to respect my elders. Smiley: frown

____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#57 Mar 15 2007 at 8:36 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Ambrya wrote:
Smasharoo wrote:

Maybe this is semantics. You don't think it's more likely they understand 'when Daddy used that tone of voice before, he hit me, that sucked' then 'Father is disciplining me for demanding an extended television watching period and hurling things at him to make my point clear. Oh dear, I will endeavor to avoid that in the future.'


It depends on their stage of cognitive development. Both sets of cognitions amount to, "If I do A, Mom/Dad does B, and B is bad, therefore A is bad." The reasoning is just more sophisticated in the second case.

You seem to be saying that:

Quote:
'when Daddy used that tone of voice before, he hit me, that sucked'
is not a good thing, but honestly, when it's all they are capable of comprehending, then it's getting the job done of conveying to the child that there are certain lines that SHALL NOT BE CROSSED.

I know the gold standard is for Mom/Dad to always be this wonderful, glowing, safe presence, but that doesn't have to equate to "Mom/Dad = Doormat." If the child feels TOO safe, to the point where he thinks he can do absolutely anything and there will be no ramifications, then there needs to be a reality check, a point at which they understand, if they cross the line, Mom/Dad will not be so safe, Mom/Dad can be a bit scary (not harmful-scary, just surprising-scary), so it's best not to cross that line.

Even a toddler has the cognitive ability to form the association, "throwing myself down on the aisle of the grocery store and kicking boxes of cereal onto the floor = SafeMommy becomes ScaryMommy, thus throwing myself down on the aisle of the grocery store and kicking boxes of cereal onto the floor = BAD."


I hear what you're saying Ambrya, but none of it points to spanking as being a solution, just some sort of punishment. We are in agreement that there need to be limitations/boundaries, and punishment, but just not that that needs to be physical striking of some kind.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#58 Mar 15 2007 at 8:37 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Again, I'm talking about spanking versus abuse. They don't equate.


All due respect, they don't equate to you personally because of the degree. What that degree is will vary from person to person. It's not that it's a slippery slope, it's just that it's completely subjective and arbitrary.

I wouldn't, because he's not my kid.

Right, this I also don't get. You'd give him a 'time out' or whatever though? The cultural tradition of hitting him requires blood relations apparently?


I tell Joph all the time that he's in for a hell of a ride with any child I give him, though, because we come from @#%^ genes, and we start @#%^ing with each other straight out of the womb.


Well at least you people have toned down the human sacrifice some.


My neice would throw a screaming tantrum over anything that nothing would cease, not even a spanking,


... right.


from the time she could make a sound. We pretty much just let her hurt herself and eventually, she learned from experience. My nephew never threw is old enough to be disrespectuful at times, and knows when my brother whomps his butt that he means business and he straightens right up and pays attention to the subsequent explanation of why his butt got whomped that he wouldn't have sat still for before. I can remember being spanked when I wouldn't listen, a quick tap on the rear, but the only time I got smacked for real was when I mocked my mother and screamed at her, and boy, I never did that again, nor do I use it to [:school:] children as to what works and what doesn't.

However, if my teenage daughter ever called me a *****, I would probably slap her, and she'd deserve it. The older I get, the less I like to be @#%^ed with.


Really? The conventional wisdom seems to be that it's wise to stop hitting them when they might hit back.


____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#59 Mar 15 2007 at 8:38 AM Rating: Good
*****
18,463 posts
Tare wrote:
Atomicflea wrote:
but the only time I got smacked for real was when I mocked my mother and screamed at her, and boy, I never did that again, nor do I use it to [:school:] children as to what works and what doesn't.


I talked back to my Dad when I was 16 and he belted me under the chin. I swear I had trouble chewing for 2 weeks. The click in my jaw reminds me to respect my elders. Smiley: frown

Yikes, see, and that's too much for me. My mom gave me a novela-style slap and a hissed "I am your MOTHER" that still makes me tear up even to this day.

We hispanics have la chancla voladora, which is when your parents become furstrated enough that they toss their flip-flop, boomerang-style at you as you run down the hall. It can also be done with vegetables, if you happen to tick them off when they're cooking.
#60 Mar 15 2007 at 8:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
Yikes, see, and that's too much for me. My mom gave me a novela-style slap and a hissed "I am your MOTHER" that still makes me tear up even to this day.


My mom slapped me once when I was a teenager, and I slapped her back twice as hard. Oddly, I don't tear up when I think about it, it still just pisses me off.

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#61 Mar 15 2007 at 8:40 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
It can also be done with vegetables, if you happen to tick them off when they're cooking.


Beware the squash of doom! Smiley: eek
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#62 Mar 15 2007 at 8:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Quote:
Really? The conventional wisdom seems to be that it's wise to stop hitting them when they might hit back.


My brother - the same one that used to get thrashed - is a father, and against all the statistical probabilities he's not a spanker.

When my nephew was a toddler and got cranky or misbehaved my brother would scoop him up and take him into the next room for a man-to-man chat. My sister in law told me that they'd discussed the discipline issue, and my brother told her, "When the kid's big enough to fight back you can smack him. For you, that'll be when he's about seven."

____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#63 Mar 15 2007 at 8:41 AM Rating: Good
The dining room fell silent
I can't believe what I just said
I just told my dad he's full of it
And I watched his face turn red
And I should've said "I'm sorry"
But I matched him shout for shout
I can still hear that screen door slammin'
The night I called him out

He said "Son it's gonna hurt me more than it hurts you"
But somehow I couldn't help but have my doubt
'Cause I'd seen my older brothers crawl back in the house
Each time they called the old man out

Fist to fist and eye to eye
Standin' toe to toe
He would've let me walk away
But I just would not let it go
Years of my frustration
Had lead me to this night
Now he'll pay for all the times that he's been right

He said "Son it's gonna hurt me more than it hurts you"
But somehow I couldn't help but have my doubt
'Cause I'd seen my older brothers crawl back in the house
Each time they called the old man out

It was over in a minute
That's when I realized
The blood came from my mouth and nose
But the tears came from his eyes
And in memory of tht fateful night
I know the greatest pain was his
And I just pray some day I'm half the man he is
Just like my older brothers
I crawled back in the house
The night I called the old man out
#64 Mar 15 2007 at 8:42 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

is not a good thing, but honestly, when it's all they are capable of comprehending, then it's getting the job done of conveying to the child that there are certain lines that SHALL NOT BE CROSSED.


Honestly, I think it might be possible to convey that to a two year old without hitting them.

Look, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying if you spank your kid twice they grow up to be lunatic psychopaths. My parents hit me, after all and...ok, that's a bad example right there, regardless of the risk of ******** your kid up for life there's just the simple question of reasoning.

If we all agree that no one ever HAS to hit their kids for any particular reason, then we come to the thing I don't understand.

At what point in the decision making process does one think "the hell with this, I'm just going to hit him. Not injure him or anything, not very hard, but I'm going to. Yup, I'm going to hit my child now, here I go."

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#65 Mar 15 2007 at 8:44 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Beware the squash of doom!


Plantains are more aerodynamic.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#66 Mar 15 2007 at 8:45 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
Atomicflea wrote:
We hispanics have la chancla voladora, which is when your parents become furstrated enough that they toss their flip-flop, boomerang-style at you as you run down the hall. It can also be done with vegetables, if you happen to tick them off when they're cooking.


Smiley: laugh Filipino parents apprently possess that skill as well with their chanilas.
#67 Mar 15 2007 at 8:46 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I talked back to my Dad when I was 16 and he belted me under the chin. I swear I had trouble chewing for 2 weeks.


Big deal. My mom stabbed me in the leg with a number two pencil and broke it off.

I still have the graphite scar. True story.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#68 Mar 15 2007 at 8:47 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Smasharoo wrote:
Does gender matter at all? If Joph Jr. were a girl would it have mattered?
Doubt it. Again, we're talking about a swat about equal to what I'd use to chase the cat off the table, not a beating.
BT wrote:
I would think that if the little tike can't grasp verbally relayed consequences hitting them is just going to be confusing.
I was speaking more of the fact that young children have no concept of time and "two days without TV" is meaningless as a threat to someone who thinks of an hour as a year. And, without bothering to get into it, no I don't advocate a swat as Plan A. Back to the incrementalism thing again.

Anyway, to tie this together, Joph Jr. is a good kid and isn't out hitting kids or abusing cats or pulling the wings off of flies. He's never been in trouble for hitting. I was physically discliplined far greater than he ever was and I'm probably gentle to a fault. I don't think Flea worries much about me becoming physically abusive. So, while I'm sure there are factors which turn kids into violent hellions, either spanking ain't solely it or else it's mitigated by other factors in your upbringing. So the whole wilting Violet routine of "Oh no! You spanked him and now he learned violence!" is water off the proverbial duck's back.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#69 Mar 15 2007 at 8:51 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Someone - Ambrya? - made the distinction of spanking as discipline and spanking out of anger. Kids know the difference. I knew the difference, when it was my dad belting my brother.

I would tend to assume that hitting a kid out of anger would be more conducive to the Bad Stuff. I have nothing to back that up with, though.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#70 Mar 15 2007 at 8:53 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Anyway, to tie this together, Joph Jr. is a good kid and isn't out hitting kids or abusing cats or pulling the wings off of flies. He's never been in trouble for hitting. I was physically discliplined far greater than he ever was and I'm probably gentle to a fault. I don't think Flea worries much about me becoming physically abusive. So, while I'm sure there are factors which turn kids into violent hellions, either spanking ain't solely it or else it's mitigated by other factors in your upbringing. So the whole wilting Violet routine of "Oh no! You spanked him and now he learned violence!" is water off the proverbial duck's back.


Yeah, that's all well and good, but the 'my parents hit me and I turned out fine so I'll hit my kid and he'll turn out fine, too' argument isn't terribly compelling to be honest.

I have no idea, and it's quite possible that I'm wrong, but my gut instinct would be that kids that were hit as children would in the aggregate be more likely to hit their kids, perpetuating a learned cultural tradition. I'd also suspect, and again, I haven't researched this at all, that kids who were hit by their parents would be more likely in the aggregate to hit other kids.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I tend to doubt it. I'll have a look around the interwebs and see what I can turn up.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#71 Mar 15 2007 at 8:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
While you're looking, see if you can find any study that was able to differentiate between rational spanking and irrational lashing out.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#73 Mar 15 2007 at 9:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Found this so far:

Quote:
"The act of corporal punishment itself is different across parents - parents vary in how frequently they use it, how forcefully they administer it, how emotionally aroused they are when they do it, and whether they combine it with other techniques. Each of these qualities of corporal punishment can determine which child-mediated processes are activated, and, in turn, which outcomes may be realized," Gershoff concludes.


So affect matters, seems obvious. Linky.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#74 Mar 15 2007 at 9:02 AM Rating: Decent
Demea wrote:
Here's a fun alternative for you: instead of spanking your children, give them manual labor. I can personally attest to its effectiveness. After all, I turned out pretty on-the-ball (although the mere act of posting here puts that into question).


Yeah.. sure Smokey McStoner...
#75 Mar 15 2007 at 9:02 AM Rating: Excellent
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
noopzilla wrote:
shouldn't the moral of this discusson be "don't let angry idiots with no self-control breed"?

Don't worry, Smash doesn't have any kids.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

#76 Mar 15 2007 at 9:03 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/113/5/1321

It's a little dense, but nothing most of this crowd can't handle.

I thought it was interesting because it was relatively on point, looking at spanking very young children < 2years.


Previous empirical studies of the relationship of spanking with child behavior problems have in general not included children younger than 2. In this study, we explored the association of spanking frequency before age 2 with children's risk for significant behavior problems ~4 years later, after they had entered school. Among children in this sample, spanking frequency before age 2 was a substantial predictor of a child's risk for behavior problems at school age for white non-Hispanic children only.

These associations are consistent with those reported in previous studies of European American and African American children older than 2. Deater-Deckard et al43 reported that spanking was positively correlated with child externalizing behaviors in subsequent years among European American children but was not significantly correlated with behavior problems among African American children. Gunnoe and Mariner45 reported that spanking frequency at ages 5 to 11 was significantly associated with an increase in fighting 5 years later among European American children but was also significantly related to a decrease in fighting among African American children. Finally, McLeod et al,46 who also used data from the NLSY-MC, reported that spanking frequency at ages 4 and above predicted significantly greater antisocial behavior among European Americans 2 years later, but the association was not statistically significant among African Americans.



Which is pretty odd, frankly. Spank a white kid, he acts out, spank a black kid, no problems.

Strange.

Edit: Reading on, it seems that they theorize that spanking kids as 'the last resort' is actually far more likely to cause them to act out than if it's a standard commonplace punishment. Apparently white folks tend to use it only in rare circumstances, a supposition supported by this thread so far.

Interesting.

Here's the discussion piece:


Spanking is thought to have greater "normative acceptance" in African American families,7,52,53 which could mean that African American children and parents are relatively less likely to perceive spanking as harsh or unfair. Alternatively, in white non-Hispanic communities—where spanking is used less frequently and where its use is thought to be more stigmatizing—frequent spanking before age 2 could be associated with other factors that indicate relatively greater developmental risk, such as high parent stress. Both interpretations are consistent with our finding (shown in Fig 1) that compared with African American and Hispanic families, child behavior problems that require a parent-teacher meeting were predicted to be relatively less common in white non-Hispanic families when spanking before age 2 was infrequent, whereas the relative ordering was the reverse in families in which spanking was relatively frequent. However, in predictions of risk for behavior problem ratings above the 90th percentile (Fig 2), African American children were predicted to be at greater risk at all spanking frequencies, suggesting that in both groups, more frequent spanking was associated with greater behavioral risk.







Edited, Mar 15th 2007 1:08pm by Smasharoo
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 186 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (186)