Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »
Reply To Thread

300Follow

#202 Mar 19 2007 at 10:35 PM Rating: Decent
****
4,158 posts
Gbaji

Quote:
Don't know if the word "better" applies. "Different" might be a better choice.

Saddam would still be in power. The UN sanctions and inspections would still be in place. We'd still be the primary enforcer of those sanctions, meaning we'd still have troops stationed in Saudi Arabia (the primary reason Bin Laden had for sending folk to kill us).

There would arguably be fewer people in the region pissed off at us. However, those few would be spending nearly 100% of their efforts hiding out, training, and planning attacks on US soil instead of rushing off to Iraq to (mostly die) trying to kill American soldiers there.


Hard to say which is "better". IMO, the invasion of Iraq and the removal of Saddam Hussein from power was inevitable. The longer we waited to do so, the worse things would get. So while we might have been able to stave things off for another 8 or 10 years, we'd have found ourselves right back faced with the same dilema again. Except by then it's likely he'd actually have rebuilt some of his weapons, potentially taking military action off the table.

You're welcome to your opinion, but I happen to think you are dead wrong.



You are either a very gifted seer of the future, or a paranoid delusional idiot.

My money is on the former.....

I think the millions of dead, injured and displaced Iraqis would agree....
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#203 Mar 20 2007 at 2:23 AM Rating: Decent
gbaji wrote:
Don't know if the word "better" applies. "Different" might be a better choice.


Well, that's progress I guess. A year ago, we would've had a three page rant about how it would've been "worse".

"Different" is ok. It's a step forward.



Quote:
We'd still be the primary enforcer of those sanctions, meaning we'd still have troops stationed in Saudi Arabia (the primary reason Bin Laden had for sending folk to kill us).


Smiley: lol

I'd almost forgotten that brilliant argument.

So I take it that that's the reason Al-Qaeda isn't attacking American targets anymore, right? Cos you left Saudi Arabia and Bin Laden is now a happy bunny?


Quote:
Hard to say which is "better".


Give it a couple of years, and even you will come round to it, in the end.

Quote:
You're welcome to your opinion, but I happen to think you are dead wrong.


The perfect premise for a healthy debate.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#204 Mar 20 2007 at 2:27 AM Rating: Decent
Back on topic, i'm going to see it Friday. One of my best mate is Greek, and he rented a whole cinema to take his friends there. Most will be Greeks.

I'm sure they'll be cheering and shouting during the whole bloddy film. I won't be suprised if they come dressed in togas and holding a spear.

As though there was any link between Ancient Greece and today's Greeks. It's as though I cheered everytime Asterix kicked the Romans ***. Well, I did, but I was 10.

Bunch of muppets.

Anyway, I'll look out for the infamous rhino.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#205 Mar 20 2007 at 7:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Omegavegeta wrote:
The 51% of Iraqis who feel it is now "Ok to attack Americans", up from 12% two years ago, think you're dead wrong.
Cite? I found a couple poll results from Iraq done recently, neither of them mentioned any such thing.
The Tribune wrote:
BAGHDAD -- On the fourth anniversary of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, two polls of public attitudes about the prolonged occupation indicate Iraqis are tiring of the U.S. presence and are deeply skeptical of its motives, even as they differ on whether life is now better without Saddam Hussein.

More than half of Iraqis believe the security situation would improve immediately after U.S.-led forces withdraw from the country, according to a face-to-face survey last month of 5,000 people commissioned by Opinion Research Business, a London market research firm.

Nearly a quarter in that survey said they believe the purpose of President Bush's plan to add more than 20,000 troops to Iraq was to use the country as a base from which to attack other Middle Eastern nations.

Despite the ravages of sectarian warfare and rocky delivery of basic services such as electricity, nearly half said life was better now than under Hussein's regime, while 26 percent said it was worse.

A separate poll commissioned by media groups, including ABC, BBC News and USA Today, indicated the number of people who felt life was "going well" had declined to 39 percent from 71 percent in November 2005.

Only 18 percent said they had confidence in U.S. troops, and half said they thought violence against American forces was "acceptable," according to the media poll of 2,212 Iraqis. The media poll, conducted Feb. 25 to March 5, found sharply different responses from Iraqis along sectarian and ethnic lines.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#206 Mar 20 2007 at 12:39 PM Rating: Good
USA Today ABC News Poll

Quote:
Slightly more than half of Iraqis -- 51 percent -- now say that violence against U.S. forces is acceptable -- up from 17 percent who felt that way in early 2004. More than nine in 10 Sunni Arabs in Iraq now feel this way.


I saw it while watching the news last night, took me awhile to find the cite. But thanks Joph ^^
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin


#207 Mar 26 2007 at 1:48 AM Rating: Decent
Sorry to necropost somwewhat, but I finally saw 300 on Friday, and...

Well, first, the good:

THIS IS SPARTAAAAAAA !!!

Now, the bad:

It has to be the worst film I've seen in the last couple of years. Easily.

Now, to put it in context, I knew it was going to be "silly". I was not expecting an intelligent film, nor a historical adaptation, I had read the comic before, so i knew what I was getting into. Not only that, but I was drunk, stoned, and with 20 over-exctited Greeks. In other words, I was in exactly the right kind of mood for that kind of entertainment.

Well spank my *** and call my Betty.

They basically took the comic, and shot each frame exactly as it was in the comic. They changed nothing: the dialogues were the same, the angles were the same, the "athmosphere" was the same... But in film, it just doesn't feel right. It looks extremely cheesy. It sounds awful. It's has 0 nuances, 0 grey area, 0 surprises, everything is always what you expect. Always.

Even the battle-scenes are cheap. They don't feel "epic", they're not even really gory. They're just a spear going through a body, repeated for almost 2 hours.

What's worse, is that the battle scenes are the best thing about this film (except the end credits, maybe). When they're not fighting, they're engaged in some of the worst dialogue and wooden acting I've seen in a long time.

Even the Spartans are not that cool. They look like a bunch of He-man on steroids, spending the whole film running around in their tiny briefs. To be perfectly honest, I would not be surprised if this film became a gay cult classic pretty soon.

So, all in all, disappointed. I thought it was a lazy and careless adaptation of a good comic. That everything good in the comic was lost because a movie is more than just flashing images across a screen. It was not even gory. It was boring, predictable, cheesy, and gay.

I was talking to a Greek mate afterwards and he said "Well malaka, it's not like French movie wherenothing happens for 2 hours", to which I replied "True, in this one, the same one thing happens over and over for 2 hours".

And that "thing" is a spears going through a body.

Like I said, gay.

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 355 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (355)