Quote:
Don't know if the word "better" applies. "Different" might be a better choice.
Saddam would still be in power. The UN sanctions and inspections would still be in place. We'd still be the primary enforcer of those sanctions, meaning we'd still have troops stationed in Saudi Arabia (the primary reason Bin Laden had for sending folk to kill us).
There would arguably be fewer people in the region pissed off at us. However, those few would be spending nearly 100% of their efforts hiding out, training, and planning attacks on US soil instead of rushing off to Iraq to (mostly die) trying to kill American soldiers there.
Hard to say which is "better". IMO, the invasion of Iraq and the removal of Saddam Hussein from power was inevitable. The longer we waited to do so, the worse things would get. So while we might have been able to stave things off for another 8 or 10 years, we'd have found ourselves right back faced with the same dilema again. Except by then it's likely he'd actually have rebuilt some of his weapons, potentially taking military action off the table.
You're welcome to your opinion, but I happen to think you are dead wrong.
Saddam would still be in power. The UN sanctions and inspections would still be in place. We'd still be the primary enforcer of those sanctions, meaning we'd still have troops stationed in Saudi Arabia (the primary reason Bin Laden had for sending folk to kill us).
There would arguably be fewer people in the region pissed off at us. However, those few would be spending nearly 100% of their efforts hiding out, training, and planning attacks on US soil instead of rushing off to Iraq to (mostly die) trying to kill American soldiers there.
Hard to say which is "better". IMO, the invasion of Iraq and the removal of Saddam Hussein from power was inevitable. The longer we waited to do so, the worse things would get. So while we might have been able to stave things off for another 8 or 10 years, we'd have found ourselves right back faced with the same dilema again. Except by then it's likely he'd actually have rebuilt some of his weapons, potentially taking military action off the table.
You're welcome to your opinion, but I happen to think you are dead wrong.
You are either a very gifted seer of the future, or a paranoid delusional idiot.
My money is on the former.....
I think the millions of dead, injured and displaced Iraqis would agree....