Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

300Follow

#77 Mar 10 2007 at 2:17 AM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
LOL! You mean there exists at least one person that thought Troy was good?
<spoilers>






I thoroughly enjoyed it, mostly because I love graphic novels and I really felt as though I was watching a live graphic novel on screen. I liked it much more than Sin City. I'm also very embarassed to admit that when the Queen killed Theron I raised up my fists and screamed YEAHHH!

My one complaint was that I was promised some Gerard Butler *** and all I got was a vague outline and a darkened view. SO MISLED!
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#78 Mar 10 2007 at 2:50 AM Rating: Default
Yeah, Troy was good because they did a decent job with the strategy angle and historical imagery. Brad Pitt rowing ahead as Achilles to take the shore and sack the temple was good stuff. 300 does well with the close up phalanx formation, but it totally missed the bad *** strategy and view angles from above of showing how the Persians were lead into their mistaken assaults into a pass where a relatively small band of well trained well equiped fighters could kick ***.

The whole Greek alliance to meet the enemy angle was completely missed in 300. But seriously, 300 reaked of slow motion Chris Berman ESPN highlight real shots of gore. Unless, you think Sylvestor Stalone in Over the Top is quality film, you're going to be disappointed. The character development of 300 was extremely weak, except maybe the Queen, which had nothing to do with the main point of the movie.

Troy pwns 300 on battle formation, flanking manouvers, that kind of thing. WTF are fantasy LoTR beasts and animals doing in 300?!?! And puhlease, what is comic book absurd physics motions of advancing enemies being thrown back ten feet. I didn't see sweat. I saw pretty boys playing D&D in the back yard for a youtube upload, fixed with SinCityesque cinematography.

I haven't seen Sin City (besides previews) and would never go see fake comic booky stuff like that, or SpiderMan either. So I'm definitely biased in that regard. The original BatMan tv series > the Batman movies because of script and attitude, not to mention acting talent (excpet of course Jack as the Joker). If this movie was to be epic, it should have followed Braveheart + Patton rather than Sin City + Troy.
#79 Mar 10 2007 at 3:09 AM Rating: Decent
@#%^ing DRK
*****
13,143 posts
I thought it was lame. Seriously, if a movie has that much CGI and isn't animated it doesn't deserve to be made. My apologies for talking down about the work of Frank Miller. It was mediocre compared to the graphic compilation.

Edited, Mar 10th 2007 6:09am by Paskil
#80 Mar 10 2007 at 6:27 AM Rating: Default
rofl,

like i said, a low budget braveheart.

glad is didnt waste the money.
#81 Mar 10 2007 at 10:15 AM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
/shrug I didn't go for a drama, I went for the look and the action. This thing was based on the graphic novel, not the actual historic event.

I'm pretty happy because seeing something this beautiful on screen translated from the graphic novel puts movies or tv series on Sandman into the realm of possibility. Dunno if Gaiman would ever go for it, but one can hope..
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#82 Mar 10 2007 at 10:23 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Of course Smash got it wrong calling the Spartans right wing nutjobs when the Spartans were commies.


Right, them and the *****. Also, Franco and Mussolini.

All fascists are communists.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#83 Mar 10 2007 at 10:32 AM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Pikko Pots wrote:
/shrug I didn't go for a drama, I went for the look and the action. This thing was based on the graphic novel, not the actual historic event.

I'm pretty happy because seeing something this beautiful on screen translated from the graphic novel puts movies or tv series on Sandman into the realm of possibility. Dunno if Gaiman would ever go for it, but one can hope..

Only if I can play the titular role!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#84 Mar 10 2007 at 12:02 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Dunno if Gaiman would ever go for it, but one can hope..


A year ago I'd have said that was a terrible idea. After seeing Mirrormask, though, if McKean could direct it I'd have high hopes.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#85 Mar 10 2007 at 12:36 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
MonxDoT wrote:
Yeah, Troy was good because they did a decent job with the strategy angle and historical imagery.


Smiley: laugh Smiley: laugh Smiley: laugh
Smiley: lol Smiley: lol Smiley: lol

You are such a blow hard no nothing.
#86 Mar 10 2007 at 1:15 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


You are such a blow hard no nothing.


I no, right?

:)
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#87 Mar 10 2007 at 2:04 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Smasharoo wrote:


You are such a blow hard no nothing.


I no, right?

:)


Dude
#88 Mar 10 2007 at 2:39 PM Rating: Decent
Pikko wrote:
I'm also very embarassed to admit that when the Queen killed Theron I raised up my fists and screamed YEAHHH!


I actually started the female population of the theater clapping at that point. Smiley: lol

My husband was rather embarrassed.
#89 Mar 10 2007 at 3:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
Didn't she look and sound just like she was Kiera Knightley's mom?
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#90 Mar 10 2007 at 3:49 PM Rating: Good
Ministry of Silly Cnuts
*****
19,524 posts
Pikko Pots wrote:
Kiera Knightley's mom
At risk of offending my personal DF, that is too fUckin Hawt!
____________________________
"I started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left" - Seasick Steve
#91 Mar 10 2007 at 3:58 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
Wait til you see her in action! Even hotter!
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#92 Mar 10 2007 at 4:06 PM Rating: Good
***
3,053 posts
Having heard Gaiman speak last year, about projects he currently has in the works, he would first need to find the time to do Sandman. I would want Lisa Shelling-Clark to work on it too. The best piece she had in the art show, was a piece Gainman bought.
____________________________
In the place of a Dark Lord you would have a Queen! Not dark but beautiful and terrible as the Morn! Treacherous as the Seas! Stronger than the foundations of the Earth! All shall love me and despair! -ElneClare

This Post is written in Elnese, If it was an actual Post, it would make sense.
#93 Mar 10 2007 at 4:31 PM Rating: Good
***
3,128 posts
I saw 300 on an IMAX screen, I liked it and I would recommend it. There was a couple of small scenes I would have prefered cut out, like that goat head in Xerses harem, but other than those moments it was a well done action flick. If action flicks are not your thing then don't go see it.

I could see how some of the dialogue could be seen as matching pro Iraq war phrasiology, but in thinking about it, so could Lord of the Rings or any other movie where people talk about fighting for a cause that looks hopeless.
#94 Mar 10 2007 at 7:06 PM Rating: Decent
***
3,644 posts
Quote:
I would have prefered cut out, like that goat head in Xerses hare


<spoilerish>




This too was the only thing i didnt like about the movie. It all had this "yea, this could have happened..yea, deformed people would have been around back then..the fat dude with blades for arms/hands could have been real"...
But then the Goat head man... didnt like it, it should not have been in the movie.


AND..this is a lil odd. But this was the 1st movie i have ever had to wait in a line to see.
I showed up at the Show w/ 10 min to spare. There was a HUGE line. took about 15min to get mine and my bros ticket. And then we had to sit in the very front row(was the only row open with 2 seats).
But then, the Show i went to splits up its showing..2 on each side with 2 doors..ALOT in line were there for Wild Hogs. But still..all the other big box office movies iv gone and seen on opening night..never did i have to wait 15min in a line o.-
#95 Mar 10 2007 at 8:46 PM Rating: Default
[***************************************




This too was the only thing i didnt like about the movie. It all had this "yea, this could have happened..yea, deformed people would have been around back then..the fat dude with blades for arms/hands could have been real"...
But then the Goat head man... didnt like it, it should not have been in the movie.[/QUOTE]

Exactly. /tell that to Pikko. Real violence is more real. Colors gang initiation was more badass than the legendary Spartans?
#96 Mar 10 2007 at 9:24 PM Rating: Decent
Not that I'm anyone, but. I loved it. Loved. But I'm a big fan of the graphic novel and similar works, so I think a lot of my happiness came from that. My husband was less enthusiastic, but still liked he (he's not a comic guy).

So much is reproduced straight from the graphic novels... just like Sin City, but it's beautiful, and it shines, and it's actually pretty emotional (though very straightforward).

Something interesting -- I was already sold on it, but my husband said, hey, let me read you this review. I'll quote some of it here. It sounded so fanboyish:

Quote:

...For today brings about the release of "300," and it is the "Citizen Kane" of cinematic graphic novels.

This is a movie that revels in a time when men were men and women were women, and the men loved the women but spent most of their time fighting with other men, all the while spouting grandiloquent speeches about duty and country and loyalty, and the glory of a "beautiful death" on the battlefield.

It is excessively, cheerfully violent -- and it is gorgeous to behold. It looks like the world's most sophisticated and expensive video game, and I mean that in a good way.

In this sweeping and epic adaptation of the classic graphic novel from master-of-the-genre Frank Miller ("Sin City," "The Dark Knight Returns"), director Zack Snyder has created a jaw-dropping, surrealistic dreamscape filled with stunning images, simmering and seriocomic homoeroticism, a topless oracle-babe, a sexy queen, larger-than-life warriors, hot love scenes, cutting-edge special effects and battle sequences so ambitious, you sometimes have to laugh at the sheer audacity of the whole thing.

This is a film that never, not for one second, considers taking its foot off the accelerator. Once the battle is joined, it pretty much keeps going until the final frame, with only a few dialogue-driven scenes placed here and there to allow you to catch your breath, turn to your buddy and say, "Are you #%!#$!* kidding me!"

This is the kind of movie that throws babies off a cliff, literally. (Hey -- there's a reason for it.) This is the kind of film that presents battlefield beheadings with the same slow-motion poetry it employs for a soft-core sex sequence, and if you're offended by that, you're at the wrong flick. The blood flies and spurts with such force and velocity that I felt a little like one of those front-row attendees at a Blue Man Group show, where they have you put on a poncho lest you get covered in viscous liquid goo.

...

Though his face is covered with a tricky beard throughout and a battle mask for much of the film, Gerard Butler delivers an honest and three-dimensional performance as King Leonidas, who never strays from his convictions and never hesitates to put himself on the front lines. Perhaps the only stronger character in the film is his adoring wife, Queen Gorgo (the luminous Lena Headey). She doesn't just encourage her king to take on the suicidal task of fending off the Persians, she insists upon on it, telling him, "Return with your shield -- or on your shield." Something tells us she won't be tying yellow ribbons 'round the old Greek columns, waiting for her man to come home.

...

Snyder directs "300" as the tallest of tall tales -- a vivid dream. You want realism and devotion to the hard facts, watch the History Channel. You want to experience the Battle of Thermopylae as a nonstop thrill ride, here's your ticket.


And then he told me it was Richard Roeper, for the Chicago Sun-Times.

It's a good review. It's accurate. And if you're into that kinda thing, it's an incredible movie.
#97REDACTED, Posted: Mar 10 2007 at 9:31 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) {Holy SHIZNIT!} Batman! I PWNED Richard Roeper. As Vance Kelly would sing about the locals from California, California and 26th, what a candy cnut licker! And you thought Alla sold out hard .... lol.
#98 Mar 10 2007 at 11:29 PM Rating: Excellent
Mistress of Gardening
Avatar
*****
14,661 posts
MonxDoT wrote:
Exactly. /tell that to Pikko. Real violence is more real. Colors gang initiation was more badass than the legendary Spartans?


Quote:
You want realism and devotion to the hard facts, watch the History Channel. You want to experience the Battle of Thermopylae as a nonstop thrill ride, here's your ticket.


I went to see a graphic novel come to life, not a fracking history lesson. You didn't like it, that's fine. I did. Smiley: oyvey
____________________________
Yum-Yum Bento Box | Pikko Pots | Adventures in Bentomaking

Twitter


[ffxivsig]277809[/ffxivsig]
#99 Mar 10 2007 at 11:33 PM Rating: Default
k, fine Pikko, you win, it was an action movie, a graphic novel, on screen. And Richard Roeper called it "the next Citizen Kane". Plenty of arbitrage 'fer me, yarrrgghhh!
#100 Mar 11 2007 at 2:12 PM Rating: Decent
People who go into a movie looking for problems are going to find them no matter the stretch. It's sad really. Smiley: oyvey
#101 Mar 11 2007 at 5:28 PM Rating: Good
***
1,437 posts
went to go see it last night, line was to friggin long.Next week !
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 358 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (358)