Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

In maryland...Follow

#27 Feb 27 2007 at 3:15 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
Thievery is sub-human. Thievery is savage. Thievery is barbaric.


even like a poor homeless kid stealing bread to feed his poor dying grandmother because they have no system that works FOR THEM?

hypothetically...
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#28REDACTED, Posted: Feb 27 2007 at 3:21 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Of course. It's absolutely no different than if the rich pampered grocer stole bread from a poor homeless kid to eat in front of the poor homeless kid's face while laughing.
#29 Feb 27 2007 at 3:27 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
MonxDoT wrote:
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
even like a poor homeless kid stealing bread to feed his poor dying grandmother because they have no system that works FOR THEM?

hypothetically...


Of course. It's absolutely no different than if the rich pampered grocer stole bread from a poor homeless kid to eat in front of the poor homeless kid's face while laughing.


how do you figure this?


Survival of the Fittest?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#30 Feb 27 2007 at 3:29 PM Rating: Decent
I think colleges and universities should take the best students they can get and educate them. In my experience, out of state tuition is on the order of 10 times higher then instate and thus would effectively eliminate the possibility of all but the richest to attend - vastly reducing the pool of possible applicants.

So it turns out I'm a greedy ******* and don't want to pay for second rate students to attend my local public university systems.

Sorry, no free ride because you were born here.
#31REDACTED, Posted: Feb 27 2007 at 3:34 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I figure it as logical EITHER/OR complete set possibility. One leads to a Hobbesian war of all against all. The other leads to the existence of society and enhanced material benefit for the members of society.
#32 Feb 27 2007 at 3:36 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
To say that something is Either/Or is seldom a complete anything.
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#33REDACTED, Posted: Feb 27 2007 at 3:42 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ooooh, I'm so glad you brought up out of state tuition. How American is that? Why aren't colleges sued in class action lawsuits the way businesses are for such anti-compeitive pricing? Sounds like colored versus white water fountains to me.
#34 Feb 27 2007 at 3:44 PM Rating: Default
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
To say that something is Either/Or is seldom a complete anything.


Unfortunately, it's the only way anything is said or a completed something at all. Think about it. That's deep epistemological **** right there.

Edited, Feb 27th 2007 5:45pm by MonxDoT
#35 Feb 27 2007 at 3:45 PM Rating: Good
****
6,730 posts
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
To say that something is Either/Or is seldom a complete anything.


But he speaks in absolutes and uses fancy phrases like "Hobbesian war of all against all." He must know what he is talking about!
#36 Feb 27 2007 at 3:48 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
My observation in this entire thing is:

That they are admittidly illegal and thus breaking the law; why aren't they arrested onthe spot? What is it that is stopping that from happening? In one state illegals get rounded up by vigilantes and in another state they are treated fairly well. is it a loophole? It it simply a blatant lack of resources?
I am not saying that I wish for them to be rounded upFlea. I am simply pointing out my observation of this anomaly. Here is a group of documented lawbreakers. Where is INS? Does the Federal governement have such little hand in these matters? I want answers dammit!! lol
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#37 Feb 27 2007 at 3:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MonxDoT wrote:
Ooooh, I'm so glad you brought up out of state tuition. How American is that? Why aren't colleges sued in class action lawsuits the way businesses are for such anti-compeitive pricing? Sounds like colored versus white water fountains to me.
You're kidding, right?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#38REDACTED, Posted: Feb 27 2007 at 3:58 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The Japansese Admiral spoke wisely when he concluded: "I fear we have awoken a sleeping giant". People are apathetic. People are defeated and burdened by the mob. But let me put on my MonxZoro costume and rally the mass for true freedom.
#39 Feb 27 2007 at 3:59 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
Quote:
People are defeated and burdened by the mob.


Hello. The people are the mob.

Quote:
All must be held to the same punishment without regard to artificial "border". Thus, there's no choice but for the opposition to attempt to force the opposite policy goals down everyone else's throats as well. Slavery, of say doctors, is perfectly fine with the left, as long as it's enforced in every State.


Ok. You're the new Dracoid. got it.

____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#40REDACTED, Posted: Feb 27 2007 at 4:03 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Not at all, completely serious. How the fuck can Academia get away with a blatant anti-competitive pricing system for higher education? If any health insurance company or mutual fund company tried that, they'd be besieged by class action law suits. The time has come to apply the progessive methods and tactics to other areas, like college tuition rates on the basis of sex, race, creed, or nationality, or range of nationality (State).
#41REDACTED, Posted: Feb 27 2007 at 4:06 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) And Tony Soprano is the people, the people who count. Violence is violence, wehther committed by an individual or committed by a mob of individuals.
#42 Feb 27 2007 at 4:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
MonxDoT wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
You're kidding, right?
Not at all, completely serious.
Smiley: laughSmiley: laughSmiley: laugh

Ah, you.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#43 Feb 27 2007 at 4:08 PM Rating: Good
Imaginary Friend
*****
16,112 posts
MonxDoT wrote:
Kelvyquayo the Irrelevant wrote:
Hello. The people are the mob.


And Tony Soprano is the people, the people who count. Violence is violence, wehther committed by an individual or committed by a mob of individuals.


Why you gettin' all violint n' shi~?
____________________________
With the receiver in my hand..
#44REDACTED, Posted: Feb 27 2007 at 5:23 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Watch how violent the political left and political right both get if a terrorist comes into the USA through the Mexican border and successfully attacks a juicy target. Hello internment camps for illegally present non-citizens. The procedural basis has already been established at Gitmo. 'Cause it would be progressively wrong to discriminate or profile according to national, racial, or religious background. Terrorist used a complicit Bank of America credit card without proving valid identification? Hello hundreds of billions of dollars law suits on behalf of the victims. The political downside to not enforcing the border is hundreds of times more immense than the political downside of losing the Iraq war.
#45 Feb 27 2007 at 6:03 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
On the subject of Illegal immigrants and taxes, one of the things you have to realize is that while they do pay taxes, the bulk of the taxes they pay are federal level, not state or local (baring sales taxes of course, but that's another issue).

What's happening in states with a high rate of Illegals (like California) is that the arguement that "they pay taxes" is used to justify things like in-state tuition and education and medical insurance. Those are all paid for by the state though, with federal monies being allocated based on "legal citizens" of the state itself.

What this means is that while they may be filling federal taxes and paying them (which they don't really have a choice unless they're being truely paid under the table), that money does not ever come back to the state in which they are living. However, most of the expenses incurred by illegals *are* paid for by the state.


I really think the issue is somewhat irrelevant anyway. Are we actually arguing that as long as someone pays taxes they automatically get to be a citizen? Um... Don't we have a naturalization process? How about we follow that (or change it if we think it needs changing). This smacks of going around the backs of the people to force changes that you know would never fly otherwise. Ultimately, whether someone pays taxes is not the issue. The issue is whether or not they have legal citizenship. If they do, great. If they don't. That's too bad. My fear is that the arguments that they pay taxes will become arguements that it's ok to let them continue living here in an illegal status (and I think some have already made that argument). That's a bogus argument IMO. If you want to change the requirements, numbers, or anything else involving our immigration policy, then fight to change the policy. Don't figure it's ok to ignore it because folks pay taxes...


This is one of the reasons I supported the idea of a guest worker program (and still think it's the right course). Unfortunately, it got slammed from both sides of the political fence, leaving us pretty much back at square one.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#46 Feb 27 2007 at 6:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
What's happening in states with a high rate of Illegals (like California) is that the arguement that "they pay taxes" is used to justify things like in-state tuition and education and medical insurance. Those are all paid for by the state though, with federal monies being allocated based on "legal citizens" of the state itself.

What this means is that while they may be filling federal taxes and paying them (which they don't really have a choice unless they're being truely paid under the table), that money does not ever come back to the state in which they are living. However, most of the expenses incurred by illegals *are* paid for by the state.
Does CA not have a state income tax? I'm just asking as I have no idea. Illinois does and, if you're getting money extracted from your check for Federal, you're getting State taken out as well.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#47 Feb 27 2007 at 6:49 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Does CA not have a state income tax? I'm just asking as I have no idea. Illinois does and, if you're getting money extracted from your check for Federal, you're getting State taken out as well.


We do. But it's not nearly high enough to cover what the state pays for various programs. You could argue that the state should raise taxes, but that's ignoring the problem. The federal level taxes at higher rates with the assumption that those monies will then be dispersed back to the states via funding programs. Anything that creates discrepancies between the taxes collected, number of actual people the program would need to provide for, and the actual number of legal citizens/aliens upon which the "need" is actually calculated ends up causing a shortage.

If instead of funneling money through the federal government we simply taxed for everything at the state level instead, this wouldn't be an issue. But since we don't do that anymore, it's kinda unfair to tax californians for stuff, then not provide them the funding that they paid for, and then require that they pay more taxes to cover up the shortage.


As long as the lions share of tax dollars flows through the federal government, it's going to ***** over states with a high percentage of illegal immigrants. There's just no way around it.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#48 Feb 27 2007 at 7:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
We do. But it's not nearly high enough to cover what the state pays for various programs.
I'm sure. I'm just addressing the "They don't pay taxes" canard. They do pay sales taxes, someone is paying the property taxes on their residences and however many of them who are working under false papers (as opposed to being paid cash) are paying federal/state income taxes as well. Plus Social Security, et al.

I'm not arguing whether or not they're paying their "fair" share or enough to off-set their existance. Just that they are paying into the system.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#49 Feb 28 2007 at 4:45 AM Rating: Decent
****
4,126 posts
Don't have time to read the whole article but I had to make a comment....

Being 15k in debt from stupid loans and they wanna give illegal spicks free school? I wonder why so many people hate this country.
#50 Feb 28 2007 at 5:23 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Deadonarrival wrote:
Being 15k in debt from stupid loans and they wanna give illegal spicks free school?
Wow. $15k wasted just like that.

No one was offering anyone free school.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#51 Feb 28 2007 at 6:49 AM Rating: Default
this whole illegal immigrant thing is just sooo hypocritical. how in hell do you think we all came to be here, with the exception of american indians? you want to know why this is such a hot issue now, but would never have made the front page 50 years ago? because THIS generation has forgotten where they come from.

florida, texas, california are three of a hand full of states that dont have a state income tax. want to know why? "illegal" immigrants. a constant flow of new people comming into these states, buying food, cars, paying rent, utilities, buying clothes, and paying state sales tax on all of it. some of them even manage to buy a home and then pay property tax as well.

they have bank accounts and pay bank fees. they have loans and pay interest.

they are a boon to any state lucky enough to have an "illegal immigrant problem".

ohhs, noos, they are getting an education at the states expense.....it must be stopped.

yea, so did your grandfather, or your great grandfather. why dont you ask them if it should be stopped. why dont you ask them if their stint on ellis island when they came over should be the standard in this country as to how we treat people comming here looking for a better life. why dont you ask them if we should kick every one who comes here without an invitation out the door?

"illegal" immigrants built this country. even the whitehouse was built with slaves. we are what we are BECAUSE of illegal immigrants, not inspite of them.

hell yes, make them take a drivers license test. its better than the alternative, them driving without knowing how. hell yes send them to school so they can learn our language and how we do things here. and hell yes, get them some medical attention. better to find a desease early than having sone one running around spreading it for years because they cant get medical help.

and guess what? they have paid for it with taxes already, just like you.

you want to know why no one goes after the bussiness that hire them? why no one forces them to pay into medicare, workers comp, or federal income taxes?

because big bussiness makes the rules. adn they are all for condeming an underclass as "illegal" to get cheap labor so they DONT have to pay for those things. think about that the next time you hear a politican crying "illegal immigrant" right before an election year. think about that the next time you smoke a cigarette, or buy sugar or corn.

they are not the problem. they are a blessing. how we treat them is the problem.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 291 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (291)