Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Obama already following in Kerry's footsteps?Follow

#27 Feb 17 2007 at 3:50 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I hate to say it Smash, but I don't see "general Welfare of the people" in there anywhere. Go ahead and make that next leap.


Are you really this pathetically desperate?


You have to remember what the founding fathers of the United States were trying to avoid, and why there is a distinction between country and populace, and there is a very strong distinction made by the fathers of this nation.


I see that you are.

The founding fathers of the United States were largely drug addled slave owning ner do wells who wanted to only allow rich white land owning men to vote. That being said, the general welfare clause of the Constitution was clearly intended to allow for taxes to provide government services related to but not exclusive to feeding, clothing, educating, and ensuring the general well being of the masses.

That's what it means, that's what it was intended to mean, that's what they wrote they specifically wanted it to mean and that's what it means now.

If you want to get into a specific debate about founder's intent and Constitutional law we can, but it's only going to end with you in tears realizing what an ignorant *** you are and marveling at how easily you were suckered into being spoon fed bits and pieces of information about the founding of the US.

Let me know.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#28 Feb 17 2007 at 5:34 PM Rating: Decent
***
2,453 posts
Metastophicleas wrote:
I would say it's a country.


A country of the people, by the people and for the people, maybe? Nah, what the hell would Lincoln know? Clearly he was way off base when he made that remark.
#29 Feb 17 2007 at 6:21 PM Rating: Good
Vagina Dentata,
what a wonderful phrase
******
30,106 posts
It doesn't surprise me that the right wing media is out with their long knives already, looking to make innuendos.

After all, the right are experts at the smear campaign and with such outlets such as Fox News, things like objectivity or credible political analysis seem unimportant.

I mean, the right wing media has done such diabolical things. For example:

Republican political ad comparing a Georgia Senator (who was a triple amputeed Vietnam vet) to Osama bin Laden because he opposed a provision in the Homeland Security bill.

Said the Barack Obama, a black man running for president would have supported slavery because he is a "uniter" and "not a divider."

Managed to push a bill to impeach the President for lying to congress about his sexual behavior while just a little while later, preaching about the politics of destruction when there is even talk of censure for lying about the reason we went to Iraq and cherry-picking intelligence. Not to mention the fact that they paint the "anti-war" politicians as "leftist extremists" even though the majority of Americans oppose the course of the war.

And Cheney didn't suffer anything from shooting a man in the face.

And probably the worst part--our fake culture war that essentially uses prejudices deep in our American consciousness for political gain and to paint a complex and diverse nation in simplistic terms of good and evil for the sole purpose of a power grab and an attempt to gain political currency by never really talking about actual governance, just vague "values" that have little meaning. I'm from rural America and if someone is a dumbsh*t enough to think that gay marriage destroys the traditional structure of conservative rural america more than agribusiness, then I seriously wonder if they should have the right to vote in the first place.

I don't know. I think that somewhere, the neocons made a deal with the devil. Everywhere there are right wing pundits in a faux-victim stance, preaching about bias on the news while promoting an administration that has deliberately obfuscated and obstructed the press from having access. They went after Dan Rather for sh*t that had less of an impact than what Fox aired about Kerry and how he got his purple hearts which was misleading bullsh*t--and I don't particularly like Kerry.

Overall, this is it. The mudslinging. The bullsh*t. The endless playing. This is why we have the government that we have. There is no honor among thieves and there will be no talk about actual governance, just vague accusations of being antipatriotic and some such bs.

And let's not forget who is the bigger @#%^ here. Obama? Kerry? Or is it GWB and his cronies who lead the troops to a war without sufficient planning, ignoring legitimate protests about numbers and our readiness to enter a war like this while still in Afganistan and based on false intelligence and for unclear purposes. I vote for GWB. He's the ******* that doesn't value anyone's lives.



Edited, Feb 17th 2007 9:33pm by Annabella
____________________________
Turin wrote:
Seriously, what the f*ck nature?
#30 Feb 17 2007 at 6:32 PM Rating: Excellent
Nexa
*****
12,065 posts
hmmm, methinks someone has been drinking. I suppose you could get this excited about everything though!

Nexa
____________________________
“It has always been the prerogative of children and half-wits to point out that the emperor has no clothes. But a half-wit remains a half-wit, and the emperor remains an emperor.”
― Neil Gaiman, The Sandman, Vol. 9: The Kindly Ones
#31 Feb 17 2007 at 7:45 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Smasharoo wrote:
The founding fathers of the United States were largely drug addled slave owning ner do wells who wanted to only allow rich white land owning men to vote.

Some call them 'visionaries', I prefer 'malcontents'.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#32 Feb 19 2007 at 12:51 PM Rating: Decent
from the ny times website

Quote:
A New Hampshire reporter asked Mr. Obama whether he regretted the remark, made at a rally on Sunday that “we ended up launching a war that should have never been authorized and should have never been waged, and to which we now have spent $400 billion and have seen over 3,000 lives of the bravest young Americans wasted.”

“Even as I said it,” Mr. Obama said Monday, “I realized I had misspoken.”



malkin and aim are definitely partisan, so i wanted to find from the other side of the partisan fence. The problem i think is that to a large amount of the democratic base, what he says is right on the money. The war in iraq is a waste of time, and lives. It was unintended honesty.
#33 Feb 19 2007 at 1:04 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

The problem i think is that to a large amount of people not actively hallucinating, what he says is right on the money


This seems obviously true.

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#34 Feb 19 2007 at 1:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Neispace wrote:
The problem i think is that to a large amount of the democratic base, what he says is right on the money.
To a large amount of everyone, really. What's the support numbers for Bush's surge? 30%? About the same as Bush's popularity rating?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#35 Feb 19 2007 at 1:42 PM Rating: Decent
Damnit! I really don't want to have to vote for Hillary but Obama just ****** up!
#36 Feb 19 2007 at 1:48 PM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

Damnit! I really don't want to have to vote for Hillary but Obama just @#%^ed up!


You can't possibly really be this ******* stupid, can you?
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#37 Feb 19 2007 at 1:49 PM Rating: Good
I want a T-Shirt that says: "Katie is a stupid *****."


Oops, wrong thread.
#38 Feb 19 2007 at 3:12 PM Rating: Decent
Metastophicleas wrote:

http://www.aim.org/guest_column/5243_0_6_0_C/

[quote]Last week, Senator Barak Obama told a crowd of college students at Iowa State University that those soldiers who have died in Iraq "wasted" their lives.


im dissappointed. I have not really started following the canadates yet, but was hopping for a of good to come from the Obama camp.
#39 Feb 19 2007 at 3:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Singdall wrote:
Metastophicleas wrote:

http://www.aim.org/guest_column/5243_0_6_0_C/
Quote:
Last week, Senator Barak Obama told a crowd of college students at Iowa State University that those soldiers who have died in Iraq "wasted" their lives.
im dissappointed. I have not really started following the canadates yet, but was hopping for a of good to come from the Obama camp.
You realize, I hope, that the quoted article is misleading and inaccurate.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#40 Feb 19 2007 at 3:18 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Singdall wrote:
im dissappointed. I have not really started following the canadates yet, but was hopping for a of good to come from the Obama camp.
You realize, I hope, that the quoted article is misleading and inaccurate.


Rather like your spelling.
____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#41 Feb 19 2007 at 3:19 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
You realize, I hope, that the quoted article is misleading and inaccurate.


Smiley: dubious

You give some of us too much credit, Joph.

Edited, Feb 19th 2007 6:20pm by Belkira
#42 Feb 19 2007 at 3:49 PM Rating: Decent
Jophiel wrote:
Singdall wrote:
Metastophicleas wrote:

http://www.aim.org/guest_column/5243_0_6_0_C/
Quote:
Last week, Senator Barak Obama told a crowd of college students at Iowa State University that those soldiers who have died in Iraq "wasted" their lives.
im dissappointed. I have not really started following the canadates yet, but was hopping for a of good to come from the Obama camp.
You realize, I hope, that the quoted article is misleading and inaccurate.


as i clearly stated i have not started following any of the canadates yet, thus i have not had a chance to follow up on this article or others. misleading and inaccurate or not. still does not change how i feel about the situation.

as we come close to the end of the year i will start paying more attention to the details of the canadates that are left in the race as the run up to 08' begins in ernest.
#43 Feb 20 2007 at 2:11 AM Rating: Decent
Singdall wrote:
as we come close to the end of the year i will start paying more attention to the details of the canadates that are left in the race as the run up to 08' begins in ernest.


Why do you hate Canada?

Also, why form an opinion if you admit you know nothing about the subject? How can you feel "let down" if you can't even be bothered to read the freaking story? If someone told you Obama poisoned the water of American soldiers in Iraq, would you feel "let down"?

____________________________
My politics blog and stuff - Refractory
#44 Feb 20 2007 at 10:31 AM Rating: Decent
if from what little i did read is semi true and he made the above statement from the OP, then yes i CAN feel let down. i was following him in the 04' election year even though he did not run. from what i have seen/read of him, i like him. so yes i do have the right to feel let down.

if he made that statement out of context or not does not matter.
#45 Feb 20 2007 at 10:33 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts


if he made that statement out of context or not does not matter.


None of it matters to you. You're too stupid to decide who to vote for on your own, just go back to ************ in the corner to Gladiator and we'll let you know who you're supposed to vote for in a year or so when we've decided for you.
____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#46 Feb 20 2007 at 10:55 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Singdall wrote:
if he made that statement out of context or not does not matter.
Of course.

In other news, in this thread where Smash talks about white men owning slaves, Singdall said -- and I quote -- "i will start paying more" thus letting me down with his endorsement of purchasing human lives.

Because context doesn't matter.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#47 Feb 20 2007 at 11:07 AM Rating: Good
Drama Nerdvana
******
20,674 posts
Singdall wrote:
if he made that statement out of context or not does not matter.


What an ignorant piece of dog sh'it you are.

Feel free to be offended by that whether you get or don't get the context, c'unt.
____________________________
Bode - 100 Holy Paladin - Lightbringer
#48 Feb 20 2007 at 11:20 AM Rating: Decent
So far Obama has not made himself well known to the majority of the US. We realize he's black but thats about it. I'm not a fan of saying those who died doing what they believed in wasted their lives, but I admit to being one of the many who know nothing about this guy. I'm anti-Hilary because she was ignorant enough to marry Bill. Other than that I need more information before I make a decision on who I will vote for.


PS.

Kerry to burn in hell! May that rat ******* never run for president again!
#49 Feb 20 2007 at 11:26 AM Rating: Decent
***
2,501 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Singdall wrote:
Metastophicleas wrote:

http://www.aim.org/guest_column/5243_0_6_0_C/
Quote:
Last week, Senator Barak Obama told a crowd of college students at Iowa State University that those soldiers who have died in Iraq "wasted" their lives.
im dissappointed. I have not really started following the canadates yet, but was hopping for a of good to come from the Obama camp.
You realize, I hope, that the quoted article is misleading and inaccurate.


It seems that he didn't catch the trascript that you posted a couple of posts later.

The article is misleading after reading the actual transcript. I still think that his statement was poorly worded, and he admitted that, which I applaud. I think that he appears to be a stand up guy, and could be a good leader, however, that remains to be seen. I'd still rule him out for '08 (too little experience so far, but that could be a good thing), but he could be a likely front runner for '12. It'll be interesting to see him debate people like Savage or even Ron Paul (who is considering running, can't wait there). I think that this could be one of the best elections for watching in our lifetimes. Dare I say it, but this could be the election that actually unites the population against horrible spending and taxation practices.
#50 Feb 20 2007 at 11:28 AM Rating: Decent
Lunatic
******
30,086 posts

I'm not a fan of saying those who died doing what they believed in wasted their lives


What if they believed in puppy raping? Would it be ok then?

____________________________
Disclaimer:

To make a long story short, I don't take any responsibility for anything I post here. It's not news, it's not truth, it's not serious. It's parody. It's satire. It's bitter. It's angsty. Your mother's a *****. You like to jack off dogs. That's right, you heard me. You like to grab that dog by the bone and rub it like a ski pole. Your dad? Gay. Your priest? Straight. **** off and let me post. It's not true, it's all in good fun. Now go away.

#51 Feb 20 2007 at 11:29 AM Rating: Decent
Great analogy Smash. Yes, those to ideals are "exactly" alike.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 165 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (165)